Carcharocles sp.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.2008.0077 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3D85D369-7A74-44B6-9766-7C4B8B26705B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A6C023-FF82-4E18-1D71-FC3DFD58FD40 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Carcharocles sp. |
status |
|
Fig. 4E View Fig .
Referred specimens.—BCGM 9055, SC 2009.18.5.
Comments.— Ward and Bonavia (2001) commented on species concepts (i.e., biological, morphological, chronological) with regard to Carcharocles Jordan and Hannibal, 1923 . Based solely on morphology, our tooth compares favorably to Miocene C. subauriculatus (Agassiz, 1839) . Reinecke et al. (2005) considered Oligocene C. angustidens (Agassiz, 1843) and Miocene C. subauriculatus as chronospecies. Purdy et al. (2001) noted that lateral cusplets of C. subauriculatus are not differentiated from the main cusp by a deep notch as in teeth referred to C. angustidens (also Marsili et al. 2007). Carcharocles angustidens has been identified from numerous Oligocene deposits worldwide (i.e., Uyeno et al. 1984; Génault 1993; Baut and Génault 1999; Gottfried and Fordyce 2001; Reinecke et al. 2001, 2005). Interestingly, Purdy et al. (2001) identified teeth from the Chandler Bridge Formation as C. subauriculatus , and some of the teeth identified as C. angustidens by Uyeno et al. (1984: pl. 3: 2, 3) are similar to C. subauriculatus . Perhaps Oligocene C. subauriculatus −like teeth represent the first occurrence of a distinct species, or represent variation within C. angustidens .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.