Galeorhinus sp.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.2008.0077 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3D85D369-7A74-44B6-9766-7C4B8B26705B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A6C023-FF8E-4E15-1D71-FF18FB49FB59 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Galeorhinus sp. |
status |
|
Fig. 5N–P View Fig .
Referred specimens.—BCGM 9080–9083, SC 2009.18.13.
Comments.—These teeth can be distinguished from all other Chandler Bridge carcharhinids in that the labial crown foot is obviously thicker and clearly overhangs the root. Upper teeth of Chaenogaleus Gill, 1862 are distinguished from Galeorhinus Blainville, 1816 in having a labial crown foot that does not overhang the root ( Cappetta 1987). Heterodonty is developed in our sample; parasymphyseal teeth are nearly symmetrical ( Fig. 5N View Fig ) and anterior teeth have a rather erect cusp, elongated and smooth mesial cutting edge, and two to four large cusplets on the distal heel ( Fig. 5O View Fig ). Teeth become smaller and the cusp more distally inclined towards the commissure ( Fig. 5P View Fig ). A specimen identified by Case (1980: pl. 7: 3) as G. affinis (Probst, 1878) is more appropriately referred to Physogaleus , and an additional specimen identified as G. galeus (Linnaeus, 1758) (see Case 1980: pl. 7: 6) may best be left in open nomenclature. This latter specimen differs from our material in having five obvious distal cusplets as opposed to three or four. Although of similar size, the Chandler Bridge Galeorhinus differs from extant G. galeus in having fewer cusplets on the distal blade, a more convex mesial cutting edge, and nodular ornamentation on the labial crown foot (see also Herman et al. 1988). A specimen from the Oligocene of North Carolina assigned to G. aff. galeus by Müller (1999: pl. 5: 1) is comparable to the Chandler Bridge Galeorhinus . Material documented from the German Oligocene ( Galeorhinus sp. ) is similar to the Chandler Bridge teeth ( Reinecke et al. 2001, 2005).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.