Polistes (Aphanilopterus) cavapytiformis Richards, 1978
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4504.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1B0BEDBC-9409-41D7-B752-81D9843BACAA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5996014 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A787E7-FFE2-943F-B38D-9D40FE68FC93 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Polistes (Aphanilopterus) cavapytiformis Richards |
status |
|
Polistes (Aphanilopterus) cavapytiformis Richards
Paramere ( Fig. 8A View FIGURE 8 ): (1) about three times longer than wide at the middle; (2) lateral groove shalow, more pronounced on the upper part; (3) parameral spine long (about 1/6 the total length of paramere), pointed apically with long and sparse bristles; (4) paramere lobe widely developed and rounded; (5) inferior portion of paramere narrow, about 2/3 the width at the middle portion. Aedeagus ( Fig. 8B, C View FIGURE 8 ): slender; (1) apical portion with fine and serrated denticulation, extended from the apex of the apical portion to the median expansion, lateral margin straight; (2) penis valve weakly dilated and with a slight central entrance (less than 1/3 of the total length of apical portion); (3) median expansion widely developed, rounded apex; (4) lateral apodeme directed forward and almost the same size as the ventral process, (5) ventral process rounded and weakly dilated, almost straight; (6) inferior portion of aedeagus curved, in lateral view. Digitus ( Fig. 8D View FIGURE 8 ): slender; (1) apical process developed, about 1.5 times longer than the digitus base, same width from the base to the apex, (2) apex rounded; (3) anteroventral lobe short and rounded apically; (4) punctation strong and forming a central band around the base of the digitus; (5) evanescent bristles. Cuspis ( Fig. 8E View FIGURE 8 ): slender; (1) apex pointed and tapering abruptly to the end (2) long and dense bristles on cuspis; (3) punctation restricted on the lateral lobe; (4) lower part developed with short bristles.
Remarks. Richards (1978: 481) did not mention the male genitalia of this species, although his description of the male adult is very precise.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |