Polistes (Aphanilopterus) brevifissus Richards, 1978
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4504.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1B0BEDBC-9409-41D7-B752-81D9843BACAA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5996002 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A787E7-FFEF-9432-B38D-9FA2FDFEF9F1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Polistes (Aphanilopterus) brevifissus Richards |
status |
|
Polistes (Aphanilopterus) brevifissus Richards
Paramere ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ): (1) about three times longer than wide at the middle; (2) lateral groove deep, more pronounced on the upper part; (3) parameral spine long (about 1/6 the total length of paramere), pointed apically with long and dense bristles, mainly on spine base; (4) paramere lobe developed and widely rounded; (5) inferior portion of paramere narrow, about half the width at the middle portion. Aedeagus ( Fig. 5B, C View FIGURE 5 ): slender; (1) apical portion with fine and serrated denticulation, extended the apex of the apical portion to the median expansion, lateral margin straight; (2) penis valve weakly dilated and with a slight central entrance (about 1/3 of the total length of apical portion); (3) median expansion developed, rounded apex; (4) lateral apodeme directed forward, with a weak central projection and shorter than the ventral process, (5) ventral process rounded; (6) inferior portion of aedeagus curved, in lateral view. Digitus ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ): slender; (1) apical process developed, about twice longer than the digitus base, same width from the base to the apex, (2) apex rounded; (3) anteroventral lobe short and rounded apically; (4) punctation strong and forming a central band around the base of the digitus; (5) evanescent bristles. Cuspis ( Fig.5E View FIGURE 5 ): slender; (1) apex pointed and tapering abruptly to the end; (2) short and dense bristles on cuspis; (3) punctation restricted on the lateral lobe; (4) lower part developed with short bristles.
Remarks. Richards (1978: 481–482) did not describe the male genitalia of this species. He only commented that the male is very similar to the female.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |