Polistes (Epicnemius) occipitalis Ducke, 1904
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4504.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1B0BEDBC-9409-41D7-B752-81D9843BACAA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5996114 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A787E7-FFF3-942D-B38D-9B3FFF71FD69 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Polistes (Epicnemius) occipitalis Ducke |
status |
|
Polistes (Epicnemius) occipitalis Ducke
Paramere ( Fig. 28A View FIGURE 28 ): (1) about three times longer than wide at the middle; (2) lateral groove deep; (3) parameral spine short, (about 1/10 the total length of paramere), pointed apically with long and sparse bristles; (4) paramere lobe developed and pointed; (5) inferior portion of paramere narrow, about half the width at the middle portion. Aedeagus ( Fig. 28B, C View FIGURE 28 ): slender; (1) apical portion with fine and serrated denticulation, extended the apex of the apical portion to the median expansion, lateral margin straight; (2) penis valve weakly dilated and with a slight central entrance (about 1/3 of the total length of apical portion); (3) median expansion developed and weakly pointed apex; (4) lateral apodeme directed forward and almost the same size than the ventral process, (5) ventral process rounded and slightly expanded in apex; (6) inferior portion of aedeagus weakly curved, almost straight in lateral view. Digitus ( Fig. 28D View FIGURE 28 ): slender; (1) apical process developed, about twice longer than the digitus base, and very slender, (2) apex pointed; (3) anteroventral lobe short and widely rounded apically; (4) punctation weak, larger on the side of the base; (5) evanescent bristles. Cuspis ( Fig. 28E View FIGURE 28 ): slender; (1) apex pointed and tapering abruptly to the end; (2) very short and sparse bristles on cuspis; (3) punctation restricted on the lateral lobe and very reduced; (4) lower part developed.
Remarks. Richards (1978: 542) commented about the denticulation as small with 32 teeth on the aedeagus; “digitus as in P. subsericeus but distal process narrower in side view”. Unfortunately, Richards did not draw the genitalia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |