Protalactaga major, GROUPS

ZHUDING, QIU & CHUANKUEI, LI, 2003, Chapter 22: Rodents from the Chinese Neogene: Biogeographic Relationships with Europe and North America, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 279, pp. 586-602 : 590-597

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090(2003)279<0586:c>2.0.co;2

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A7D550-5871-A33A-FF44-9CCAFC02FBB7

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Protalactaga major
status

 

MAJOR GROUPS OF CHINESE NEOGENE RODENTS

One hundred and twenty­six genera of rodents within 25 groups (families and subfamilies) and representing Protrogomorpha, Sciuromorpha, Myomorpha, and Hystricomorpha are known in the Chinese Neogene. Figure 22.3 View Fig lists major groups of Neogene rodents with their temporal and geographical distribution, and relationships to Europe and North America.

CTENODACTYLIDAE : Ctenodactylidae flourished in central and northeastern Asia during the Oligocene, but declined greatly in the early Miocene and made their last occurrence in the early middle Miocene of Dingjiaergou. Six genera, Tataromys , Yindirtemys , Prodistylomys , Distylomys , Prosayimys , and Sayimys , grouped in three subfamilies, Tataromyinae , Distylomyinae, and Ctenodactylinae , have been reported mainly in the Mongolia –Xinjiang areas and northern edge of Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. All the genera except Sayimys can be found in Oligocene deposits (Wang, 1977) at low abundance except for the common Yindirtemys . Survivors migrated southwestward through Asia to the Mediterranean area and North Africa after the early Miocene, and were affected by change of environment caused by uplift of the Himalayas. See Wang’s (1997) significant revision of the family.

TACHYORYCTOIDIDAE: Two genera of this family, Aralomys and Tachyoryctoides , have been recognized in the same regions where ctenodactylids occur. Aralomys is known from Kazakhstan and is represented by quite a number of specimens from Suosuoquan, which were previously reported as Tachyoryctoides obrutschewi and T. pachygnathus ( Qiu et al., 1999) . Li and Qiu (1980) described Tachyoryctoides kokonorensis from Xiejia (early Miocene) and indeterminate species of this genus were reported at Halamagai, Zhangjiaping, Dingjiaergou, Wuertu, and Gashunyinadege ( Qiu et al., 1999; Qiu and Wang, 1999). It is clear that the two genera are survivors from Oligocene faunas, and endemic to central and northeastern Asia. They coexisted with and disappeared simultaneously with ctenodactylids in the Miocene.

TSAGANOMYIDAE : Tsaganomys is the only Neogene genus of Tsaganomyidae , and it first appeared in the early Oligocene in the Mongolian plateau. Tsaganomys cf. altaicus collected from Gaolanshan (previously Lanzhou) represents the last record of the family ( Qiu et al., 1999).

DIATOMYIDAE View in CoL : Diatomys shantungensis , collected from Shanwang and Sihong, is the only Chinese species of this family. Diatomys was first considered indeterminate to family and questionably referred to Geomyoidea ( Li, 1974). Some students transferred it to the family Pedetidae ( McKenna and Bell, 1997) View in CoL . We follow P. Mein and L. Ginsburg (1997) in their definition of a new family for this genus plus probably Fallomus . Diatomys is also known from Thailand, Pakistan, and Japan ( Kato and Otsuka, 1995), and appears to be a kind of wet/warm­adapt­ ed animal distributed in a tropical or subtropical area.

APLODONTIDAE : Aplodontid rodents are quite well known in Holarctic Oligocene deposits in Europe and North America, but are represented in China by scarce materials of four genera. These are Promeniscomys , Haplomys , Prosciurus , and Ansomys , of which only Ansomys survived into the Miocene ( Rensberger and Li, 1986; Qiu, 1987; Wang, 1987). Ansomys may have evolved from a Prosciurus ­ like ancestor, and made its first appearance in the early Miocene. Ansomys orientali s was described from Sihong and A. shanwangensis from Shanwang ( Qiu, 1987; Qiu and Sun, 1988), and questionable Ansomys was reported from Gashunyinadege, Tunggur, Amuwusu, and Shala of Inner Mongolia ( Qiu and Wang, 1999). In addition, the aplodontine Pseudaplodon is known from the Mio/Pliocene of Ertemte and Harr Obo, Inner Mongolia, and represents the last record of this family in Asia ( Fahlbusch et al., 1983). An upper and a lower premolar from Amuwusu, similar to those of Meniscomys of North America, may represent a meniscomyine rodent in the Old World.

MYLAGAULIDAE : Mylagaulids are quite diverse in North America, and also known from Zaisan Basin, Kazakhstan. Sinomylagaulus halamagaiensis described by Wu (1988) from Halamagai Formation, Junggar Basin, represents the only record of this family in China.

SCIURIDAE View in CoL : We recognize 23 genera of sciurid rodents, with Sihong, Ertemte, Shihuiba (Lufeng), and Wushan being relatively diverse and common squirrel faunas ( Qiu et al., 1985; Qiu and Lin, 1986; Qiu, 1991; Zheng, 1993). An undiagnosed new species of Palaeosciurus from Suosuoquan represents the oldest record of the family ( Qiu et al., 1999). Palaeosciurus , Eutamias View in CoL , Sciurus View in CoL , Tamiasciurus View in CoL , Atlantoxerus View in CoL , Heteroxerus , Sciurotamias View in CoL , Miopetaurista , Pliopetaurista , Petinomys View in CoL , Albanensia , Pteromys View in CoL , and Hylopetes View in CoL show affinities either to Europe or to North America, whereas Sinotamias , Prospermophilus , Tamiops View in CoL , Callosciurus View in CoL , Dremomys View in CoL , Parapetaurista , Shuanggouia , Plesiosciurus , Meinia , and Belomys View in CoL are restrict­ ed in geographical distribution to Asia. Generally, sciurids were not so diverse as they were in Europe and North America during Neogene time, and flying squirrels are not as common as they are in European sciurid faunas. Sciurids found in China demonstrate apparently ecologic provinciality throughout the Neogene, with dominance of ground squirrels in the north, and of tree and flying squirrels in the south.

CASTORIDAE View in CoL : Eight genera of beavers, Youngofiber , Anchitheriomys , Steneofiber ,? Hystricops , Castor View in CoL , Dipoides , Trogontherium , and Eucastor , have been recovered from Sihong, Tunggur, Halamagai, Amuwusu, Yushe, Ertemte, Bilike, and Wushan ( Li, 1963; Chow and Li, 1978; Zheng, 1993; Xu, 1994; Qiu, 1996a; Flynn et al., 1997; Wu et al., 1998). All the taxa, except Youngofiber , can be found in the European and North American Neogene. Youngofiber was a massive form also known from Mizunami, Japan ( Tomida and Setoguchi, 1994) as well as Sihong. The occurrence together with Diatomys in both places suggests existence of a connection between the Chinese mainland and the Japanese islands during the early Miocene. An indeterminate genus from Shihuiba and ’’ Castor View in CoL ’’ from Zhaotong, Yunnan, represent the southernmost records of beavers in China, even in the Old World. Associated with the beavers at Shihuiba are some small mammals confined to the present tropical or subtropical areas, such as tree shrew, mole shrew, spiny dormouse, and bamboo rats ( Qiu et al., 1985). Xu (1994) presented a thorough review of castorid rodents found in North and East China.

EOMYIDAE : Eomyids are another cosmopolitan group of fossil rodents, but they are poorly diversified with limited material in China. Two genera, Keramidomys and Leptodontomys , have been determined from early Miocene (Gashunyinadege) through early Pliocene (Harr Obo) localities, and these usually occur together in the Miocene deposits of North China ( Zheng and Li, 1982; Fahlbusch et al., 1983; Qiu, 1996a; Qiu and Wang, 1999). Keramidomys failed to persist into the Pliocene. An undetermined genus of this family from Shihuiba is a bunodont eomyid, which shares dental similarities with Eomys or Pentabuneomys of Europe, or with Adjidaumo of North America ( Qiu, 1994).

GLIRIDAE View in CoL : Since the finding of Myomimus View in CoL at Ertemte, dormouse material has been found at several localities, one after another. Nevertheless, only three genera, Microdyromys , Miodyromys , and Myomimus View in CoL , are recognized, and specimens of the first two taxa are rather rare ( Wu, 1985, 1986; Qiu, 1996a; Flynn et al., 1997; Wu et al., 1998; Qiu and Wang, 1999). All three genera are commonly known in Europe, but do not occur in South China. Neither Microdyromys nor Miodyromys survived into the Pliocene.

PLATACANTHOMYIDAE View in CoL : Platacanthomys View in CoL and Typhlomys View in CoL , confined to the present Oriental region, are known from Shihuiba ( Qiu, 1989) and Yuanmou recently. Zheng (1993) described three species of Typhlomys View in CoL from Wushan. An isolated tooth from Sihong, assigned to Neocometes , represents the third genus of platacanthomyid rodents found in China. The latter is also known from Thailand. Remains of these animals are not found in North China.

ZAPODIDAE : The nine genera representing this family in North China are Litodonomys , Parasminthus , Heterosminthus , Eozapus View in CoL , Protozapus , Sinozapus, Plesiozapus , Sicista View in CoL , and Lophocricetus . Litodonomys and Parasminthus are known only from early Miocene localities, such as Suosuoquan and Xiejia, whereas Heterosminthus is mainly middle Miocene, Quantougou, Dingjiaergou, and Tunggur, for example ( Li and Qiu, 1980; Qiu, 1996a; Qiu et al., 1999). Remains of the other forms derive mainly from the late Miocene and Pliocene deposits. Eozapus View in CoL , Sicista View in CoL , and Lophocricetus are common members of the Ertemte and Harr Obo faunas (Qiu, 1985; Fahlbusch, 1992). Specimens of Protozapus reported from Wenwanggou and Plesiozapus from Amuwusu are inadequate and need further identification. Only Eozapus View in CoL and Sicista View in CoL persist to the present day.

DIPODIDAE View in CoL : Neogene dipodid rodents found include Protalactaga , Paralactaga , Sminthoides View in CoL , Brachyscirtetes , and Dipus View in CoL . The earliest Neogene record of this family is an indeterminate species of Protalactaga represented by an upper molar from Wuertu fauna ( Qiu et al., 1999); that it possibly is a derived species of Parasminthus cannot be excluded. Protalactaga occurs usually in the middle Miocene of North China, such as in the Quantougou, Tunggur, and Dingjiaergou faunas. These rather primitive jumping mice failed to survive into the late Miocene. The other genera are known from the late Miocene and Pliocene (the indeterminate species of Paralactaga from Dingjiaergou in a previous faunal list may be Protalactaga major ). Sminthoides View in CoL is quite common in late Neogene deposits, whereas Brachyscirtetes and Dipus View in CoL are relatively scarce. The questionable Dipus View in CoL from Amuwusu probably represents the first record of the three­toed jerboa. Both zapodids and dipodid rodents are found only in North China.

PARACRICETODONTINAE : Eucricetodon youngi from Xiejia is the only representative of this group found in the Neogene of China ( Li and Qiu, 1980). The indeterminate species previously reported as Eumyarion sp. based on a lower molar from Tunggur has been transferred to Gobicricetodon ( Qiu, 1996a) .

CRICETODONTINAE : Five genera in this group, Megacricetodon , Democricetodon , Primus , Spanocricetodon , and Paracricetulus , have been recovered from the early and middle Miocene. Megacricetodon and Democricetodon had a large geographic distribution and made their first appearance in early Miocene (Sihong, Wuertu, Gashunyinadege) as in Europe. They seem to have thrived in North China in the middle Miocene. Wessels (1996) argued that Megacricetodon did not occur in Pakistan and that all material from the Indian subcontinent previously assigned to Megacricetodon should be allocat­ ed as the myocricetodontine Sindemys. The tiny cricetodontine Primus is known from the early Miocene of Pakistan, and similar species occur in the equivalent age Sihong fauna. Spanocricetodon from the Shanwangian of eastern China (Fangshan) is also known from Pakistan and Thailand. Young (1927) described Paracricetulus schaubi from Hsien Shui Ho (Quantougou) based on a fragmentary upper jaw with a damaged M1. Additional material has been collected from the type locality, and further study will deepen understanding of this genus. Cricetodon itself, which is known from the Miocene of Europe and western Asia, seems not to appear in eastern Asia. Records of ‘‘ Cricetodon ’’ from Suosuoquan, Dingjiaergou, and a similar genus from Sihong are misidentified (vide infra).

GOBICRICETODONTINAE: Gobicricetodontine rodents are relatively large­size cricetids with mesodont and bunolophodont cheek teeth, and include two genera, Plesiodipus and Gobicricetodon . Plesiodipus is known from several middle and early late Miocene localities of North China (Lierpu in Xining Basin, Quantougou, Tunggur, and Amuwusu). It was thought to include ancestry of siphneines, which flourished later in northeastern Asia ( Qiu et al., 1981). Qiu (1996a) described two species of Gobicricetodon from Tunggur. Previously reported Cricetodon sp. from Suosuoquan, Halamagai, Dingjiaergou, and Amuwusu should be referred to this genus.

CRICETINAE View in CoL : Cricetines rapidly replaced the archaic cricetids and diversified since the late Miocene. Including Wushan in the late Pliocene, 11 genera of this group, Sinocricetus , Nannocricetus , Kowalskia , Neocricetodon , Bahomys , Cricetulus View in CoL , Cricetinus View in CoL , Allocricetus View in CoL , Phodopus View in CoL , Chuanocricetus , and Amblycricetus , have been recognized in the late Neogene. Sinocricetus and Nannocricetus from Shala in North China and Kowalskia from Shihuiba in South China represent the first appearance of this subfamily (Baodean age). They are quite common in the late Miocene and early Pliocene faunas (Ertemte, Yushe, Bilike, Wenwanggou, etc.). Neocricetodon is known only from the late Miocene of Yushe ( Schaub, 1934; Flynn et al., 1997). Bahomys , a form of cricetid with rather complex occlusal structure, was first described from the Pleistocene of Lantian ( Chow and Li, 1965), and recently reported from the Pliocene of Wenwanggou ( Zheng and Zhang, 2000). The six other genera occur in the Yushean Pliocene (Yushe Basin, Wenwnggou, and Wushan). Differential diagnosis of these taxa is not so clear, and definition and reallocation of late Neogene cricetines remains undone. In addition, three damaged teeth from Shala have been referred to Microtocricetus , but this taxon awaits more material for confirmation.

GERBILLINAE View in CoL : Pseudomeriones is the single published representative of this group, and occurs frequently in the late Miocene and Pliocene of North China (Qingyang, Yushe, Ertemte, Wenwanggou, Bilike, and Ningxi­ an). Two species of the genus, at different stages of evolution, have been recognized ( Teilhard, 1926; Zhang, 1999).

MICROTOSCOPTINAE: Microtoscoptine rodents have a Holarctic distribution. Microtoscoptes , first named by Schaub in 1934, represents this subfamily in China. Fahlbusch (1987) described the additional material from Ertemte and Harr Obo in detail. More recently remains of this animal have been reported from Shala that may represent the earliest record of the genus ( Qiu and Wang, 1999).

BARANOMYINAE: Two taxa can be referred to Baranomyinae. These include Microtodon atavus and Anatolomys teilhardi from Ertemte, Harr Obo, and Bilike of central Inner Mongolia. They are very common in the Ertemte and Harr Obo faunas, but rare in Bilike. Baranomyine rodents seem to be replaced by the arvicolines that arise abruptly during the early Pliocene in this region, and persist into the Pleistocene only in eastern Europe.

SIPHNEINAE: Siphneines are a group of rodents derived probably from a Pleisodipus ­ like ancestor and endemic to central and northeastern Asia. They made their first occurrence in the very early late Miocene (Amuwusu) and had a rapid Pliocene radiation in the great land mass. They are commonly known in the late Neogene faunas of North China (see table 22.1) and are potentially very useful in biochronological correlations. On the basis of the presence or absence of molar roots, Teilhard and Young (1931) assigned these animals to two genera—the rooted Prosiphneus and rootless Siphneus (= Myospalax ). Zheng (1994, 1997), however, based on patterns of their occipital shield and corresponding skull features, grouped them into three subfamilies, the convex­skulled Prosiphneinae, the flat­skulled Myospalacinae, and the concave­skulled Mesosiphneinae, comprising together 10 genera. Zheng’s proposal may be reasonable, but incomplete knowledge of skulls and great molar similarity in various species make it difficult to allocate the isolated teeth that usually occur in deposits. In addition, evolutionary relationships of the diverse extant Myospalax species with various siphneines remain to be solved. According to Zheng’s definition, the Neogene siphneine genera are Myotalpavus , Prosiphneus , Chardina , Mesosiphneus , Pliosiphneus , Episiphneus , and Youngia . The first two appeared in the late Miocene, whereas the others are Pliocene.

ARVICOLINAE View in CoL : High­crowned rodents evidently increased in abundance in northeastern Asia since the late Miocene. Like the microtoscoptines, baranomyines, and siphneines in the late Miocene, arvicolines show a Pliocene radiation. Aratomys , Mimomys , Germanomys , Hyperacrius View in CoL , Villanyia , Microtus View in CoL , Clethrionomys , and Eothenomys View in CoL are the genera of this group found in the Pliocene of China. The oldest certain arvicoline is Aratomys from the early Yushean, which dominates the Bilike fauna ( Qiu and Storch, 2000). Zheng and Li (1986, 1990) reviewed the Mimomys of China. Since then, more material has been recovered from Yushe, Wenwanggou, and Daodi. Germanomys is reported from Yushe, Daodi, and Jingle. The later arvicolines include the poorly known Hyperacrius View in CoL , Villanyia , and Microtus View in CoL from Dachai, and Clethrionomys and Eothenomys View in CoL from Wushan ( Zheng and Li, 1990; Zheng, 1993).

RHIZOMYIDAE : Fossil rhizomyids in eastern Asia are not so diverse as in the Siwaliks of Pakistan and India. An indeterminate rhizomyid from Sihong (also Shanwang) represents the earliest record of the family in China. Only subfamily Rhizomyinae View in CoL is certainly recognized in the Neogene deposits. They are primitive species of Rhizomys (Brachyrhizomys) from Lufeng and Yuanmou, and more advanced Rhizomys (Brachyrhizomys) shansius from Yushe. Flynn (1993) added a species of Rhizomys View in CoL to the Miocene fauna of Yushe. Flynn and Qi (1982) and Qi (1986) described three species of Brachyrhizomys View in CoL from Lufeng, which occur together at about 8 Ma in Pakistan. A species reported previously as Brachyrhizomys hehoensis from Bulong, Tibet, is considered congeneric with Pararhizomys ( Jacobs et al., 1985) . Pararhizomys from Fugu, Shanxi, is poorly known and, if truly a rhizomyid, represents the northernmost distribution of this family in China. Rhizomys View in CoL occurs also in the late Pliocene fauna of Wushan ( Zheng, 1993).

MURIDAE View in CoL : Murid rodents appeared in China much later than in the Indian subcontinent. Progonomys and Yunomys associated with hominoids and Brachyrhizomys View in CoL from Shihuiba, Lufeng, are considered the oldest murids so far known in China ( Qiu and Storch, 1990), but an undescribed Progonomys from Lantian, Shaanxi, may represent a murid appearing earlier than those of Lufeng (Zhaoqun Zhang, personal commun.). The murid group has really flourished since the latest Miocene. At least 19 genera of this group have been recognized, with the Lufeng, Ertemte, Harr Obo, Bilike, Yushe, Wenwanggou, Daodi, and Wushan faunas being the most productive. Apodemus View in CoL , Orientalomys , Karnimata , Occitanomys , and Micromys View in CoL occur in Ertemte and Harr Obo. In addition to these elements, Chardinomys and Huaxiamys are often found in the Pliocene, as at Yushe, Bilike, Wenwanggou, and Daodi ( Jacobs and Li, 1982; Wu and Flynn, 1992; Cai and Qiu, 1993; Flynn et al., 1997; Qiu and Storch, 2000; Zheng and Zhang, 2000). Huaxiamys , Chardinomys , and Allorattus were apparently restricted in geographical distribution to the Pliocene of North China. Storch (1987) reported Rhagapodemus from Harr Obo. Saidomys is known from the late Pliocene of Afghanistan and occurs in the equivalent age fauna of Daodi. Further, Zheng (1993) determined Mus View in CoL , Hapalomys View in CoL , Chiropodomys View in CoL , Vernaya View in CoL , Leopoldamys View in CoL , Niviventer View in CoL , and Wushanomys from Wushan, which represent the earliest occurrence of these genera.

HYSTRICIDAE View in CoL : Porcupines are quite common in the Pleistocene faunas of South China. Neogene hystricids are represented by a single genus, Hystrix View in CoL , with limited specimens. An indeterminate species from Shihuiba is the oldest record of the genus so far known ( Qiu et al., 1985). Porcupines extend­ ed northward to Yushe in distribution during the Pliocene ( Flynn et al., 1997). Zheng (1993) reported H. subcristata and H. magna from Wushan, which herald the common porcupines of the Pleistocene.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Mammalia

Order

Rodentia

Family

Dipodidae

Genus

Protalactaga

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Mammalia

Order

Rodentia

Family

Dipodidae

Genus

Protalactaga

Loc

Protalactaga major

ZHUDING, QIU & CHUANKUEI, LI 2003
2003
Loc

Prospermophilus

Qiu & Storch 2000
2000
Loc

Litodonomys

Wang & Qiu 2000
2000
Loc

Litodonomys

Wang & Qiu 2000
2000
Loc

Allorattus

Qiu & Storch 2000
2000
Loc

DIATOMYIDAE

Mein & Ginsburg 1997
1997
Loc

Chuanocricetus

Zheng 1993
1993
Loc

Amblycricetus

Zheng 1993
1993
Loc

Wushanomys

Zheng 1993
1993
Loc

Huaxiamys

Wu & Flynn 1992
1992
Loc

Huaxiamys

Wu & Flynn 1992
1992
Loc

Sinotamias

Zhuding Qiu 1991
1991
Loc

Pentabuneomys

Engesser 1990
1990
Loc

A. shanwangensis

Qiu & Sun 1988
1988
Loc

Promeniscomys

Wang Banyue 1987
1987
Loc

Ansomys

Qiu Zhuding 1987
1987
Loc

Ansomys

Qiu Zhuding 1987
1987
Loc

Ansomys

Qiu Zhuding 1987
1987
Loc

Ansomys orientali

Qiu 1987
1987
Loc

Ansomys

Qiu Zhuding 1987
1987
Loc

Parapetaurista

Qiu & Liu 1986
1986
Loc

Shuanggouia

Qiu & Liu 1986
1986
Loc

Plesiosciurus

Qiu & Liu 1986
1986
Loc

Chardinomys

Jacobs & Chuan-Kuei 1982
1982
Loc

Chardinomys

Jacobs & Chuan-Kuei 1982
1982
Loc

Meinia

Qiu 1981
1981
Loc

Primus

De Bruijn, Hussain & Leinders 1981
1981
Loc

Primus

De Bruijn, Hussain & Leinders 1981
1981
Loc

Eucricetodon youngi

Li & Qiu 1980
1980
Loc

Youngofiber

Chow & Li 1978
1978
Loc

Youngofiber

Chow & Li 1978
1978
Loc

Youngofiber

Chow & Li 1978
1978
Loc

Karnimata

Jacobs 1978
1978
Loc

Spanocricetodon

Li 1977
1977
Loc

Spanocricetodon

Li 1977
1977
Loc

Aratomys

Zazhigin 1977
1977
Loc

Aratomys

Zazhigin 1977
1977
Loc

Albanensia

Daxner-Hock & Mein 1975
1975
Loc

Microtocricetus

Fahlbusch & Mayr 1975
1975
Loc

Orientalomys

de Bruijn & van der Meulen 1975
1975
Loc

Diatomys shantungensis

Li 1974
1974
Loc

Diatomys

Li 1974
1974
Loc

Diatomys

Li 1974
1974
Loc

Diatomys

Li 1974
1974
Loc

Saidomys

James & Slaughter 1974
1974
Loc

Protozapus

Bachmayer & Wilson 1970
1970
Loc

Protozapus

Bachmayer & Wilson 1970
1970
Loc

Kowalskia

Fahlbusch 1969
1969
Loc

Kowalskia

Fahlbusch 1969
1969
Loc

Occitanomys

Michaux 1969
1969
Loc

Microdyromys

de Bruijn 1966
1966
Loc

Microdyromys

de Bruijn 1966
1966
Loc

Bahomys

Chow & Li 1965
1965
Loc

Bahomys

Chow & Li 1965
1965
Loc

Megacricetodon

Fahlbusch 1964
1964
Loc

Democricetodon

Fahlbusch 1964
1964
Loc

Megacricetodon

Fahlbusch 1964
1964
Loc

Democricetodon

Fahlbusch 1964
1964
Loc

Megacricetodon

Fahlbusch 1964
1964
Loc

Megacricetodon

Fahlbusch 1964
1964
Loc

Miopetaurista

Kretzoi 1962
1962
Loc

Pliopetaurista

Kretzoi 1962
1962
Loc

Leptodontomys

Shotwell 1956
1956
Loc

Neocometes

Schaub & Zapfe 1953
1953
Loc

Heteroxerus

Stehlin & Schaub 1951
1951
Loc

CRICETODONTINAE

Stehlin & Schaub 1951
1951
Loc

Leopoldamys

Ellerman 1947
1947
Loc

Miodyromys

Kretzoi 1943
1943
Loc

Miodyromys

Kretzoi 1943
1943
Loc

Vernaya

Anthony 1941
1941
Loc

Progonomys

Schaub 1938
1938
Loc

Progonomys

Schaub 1938
1938
Loc

Germanomys

Heller 1936
1936
Loc

Germanomys

Heller 1936
1936
Loc

Brachyscirtetes

Schaub 1934
1934
Loc

Brachyscirtetes

Schaub 1934
1934
Loc

Neocricetodon

Schaub 1934
1934
Loc

Neocricetodon

Schaub 1934
1934
Loc

Pseudomeriones

Schaub 1934
1934
Loc

Microtoscoptes

Schaub 1934
1934
Loc

Heterosminthus

Schaub 1931
1931
Loc

Heterosminthus

Schaub 1931
1931
Loc

Sinocricetus

Schaub 1930
1930
Loc

Sinocricetus

Schaub 1930
1930
Loc

Protalactaga

Young 1929
1929
Loc

Protalactaga

Young 1929
1929
Loc

Protalactaga

Young 1929
1929
Loc

Pseudaplodon

Miller 1928
1928
Loc

Paracricetulus

Young 1927
1927
Loc

Myomimus

Ognev 1924
1924
Loc

Myomimus

Ognev 1924
1924
Loc

Lophocricetus

Schlosser 1924
1924
Loc

Lophocricetus

Schlosser 1924
1924
Loc

Haplomys

Miller & Gidley 1918
1918
Loc

Phodopus

Miller 1910
1910
Loc

Petinomys

Thomas 1908
1908
Loc

Hylopetes

Thomas 1908
1908
Loc

Belomys

Thomas 1908
1908
Loc

Tamiops

J. A. Allen 1906
1906
Loc

Prosciurus

Matthew 1903
1903
Loc

Prosciurus

Matthew 1903
1903
Loc

Sciurotamias

Miller 1901
1901
Loc

Adjidaumo

Hay 1899
1899
Loc

Eozapus

Preble 1899
1899
Loc

Eozapus

Preble 1899
1899
Loc

Eozapus

Preble 1899
1899
Loc

Dremomys

Heude 1898
1898
Loc

Hyperacrius

Miller 1896
1896
Loc

Eothenomys

Miller 1896
1896
Loc

Hyperacrius

Miller 1896
1896
Loc

Eothenomys

Miller 1896
1896
Loc

Atlantoxerus

Forsyth Major 1893
1893
Loc

EOMYIDAE

Winge 1887
1887
Loc

Rhizomyinae

Winge 1887
1887
Loc

Eomys

Schlosser 1884
1884
Loc

MYLAGAULIDAE

Cope 1881
1881
Loc

Eutamias

Trouessart 1880
1880
Loc

Tamiasciurus

Trouessart 1880
1880
Loc

Meniscomys

Cope 1878
1878
Loc

Typhlomys

Milne-Edwards 1877
1877
Loc

Typhlomys

Milne-Edwards 1877
1877
Loc

PLATACANTHOMYIDAE

Alston 1876
1876
Loc

ZAPODIDAE

Coues 1875
1875
Loc

Chiropodomys

Peters 1868
1868
Loc

H. magna

Redi 1868
1868
Loc

Callosciurus

Gray 1867
1867
Loc

Cricetulus

Milne-Edwards 1867
1867
Loc

Platacanthomys

Blyth 1859
1859
Loc

Hapalomys

Blyth 1859
1859
Loc

Hystricops

Leidy 1858
1858
Loc

Cricetodon

Lartet 1851
1851
Loc

Cricetodon

Lartet 1851
1851
Loc

Clethrionomys

Tilesius 1850
1850
Loc

Clethrionomys

Tilesius 1850
1850
Loc

Micromys

Dehne 1841
1841
Loc

Rhizomys

Gray 1831
1831
Loc

Rhizomys

Gray 1831
1831
Loc

Apodemus

Kaup 1829
1829
Loc

Sicista

Gray 1827
1827
Loc

Sicista

Gray 1827
1827
Loc

Sicista

Gray 1827
1827
Loc

GERBILLINAE

Gray 1825
1825
Loc

ARVICOLINAE

Gray 1821
1821
Loc

CASTORIDAE

Hemprich 1820
1820
Loc

GLIRIDAE

Muirhead 1819
1819
Loc

SCIURIDAE

Fischer de Waldheim 1817
1817
Loc

DIPODIDAE

Fischer de Waldheim 1817
1817
Loc

CRICETINAE

Fischer 1817
1817
Loc

HYSTRICIDAE

Fischer de Waldheim 1817
1817
Loc

MURIDAE

Illiger 1811
1811
Loc

Pteromys

G. Cuvier 1800
1800
Loc

Microtus

Schrank 1798
1798
Loc

Microtus

Schrank 1798
1798
Loc

Dipus

Zimmermann 1780
1780
Loc

Dipus

Zimmermann 1780
1780
Loc

Dipus

Zimmermann 1780
1780
Loc

Sciurus

Linnaeus 1758
1758
Loc

Castor

Linnaeus 1758
1758
Loc

Castor

Linnaeus 1758
1758
Loc

Mus

Linnaeus 1758
1758
Loc

Hystrix

Linnaeus 1758
1758
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF