Strigiphilus heterocerus ( Grube, 1851 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4779.4.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FB9DEC58-77E7-4994-8918-C05278C949AA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3853300 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A7FE0B-2E65-7714-FF57-FF66D2F9FB1C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Strigiphilus heterocerus ( Grube, 1851 ) |
status |
|
Strigiphilus heterocerus ( Grube, 1851)
( Figs 2–6 View FIGURES 2–6 )
Docophorus heterocerus Grube, 1851: 469 .
Type host: Strix uralensis liturata (Tengmalm, 1795) .
Strigiphilus fukuro Uchida, 1948: 307 , fig.1; Hopkins & Clay 1952: 339.
Type host: Strix uralensis hondoensis (Clark, 1907) .
Neodocophorus uralensis Eichler, 1949: 15 , figs 33–34; Hopkins & Clay 1952: 340.
Type host: Strix uralensis liturata (Tengmalm, 1795) .
Strigiphilus heterocerus ( Grube, 1851) : Hopkins & Clay, 1952: 339.
“ Strigiphilus laticephalus Złotorzycka, 1974: 324 , fig. 48”. Not Philopterus cursor var laticephalus Uchida, 1949 . “ Strigiphilus laticephalus Adam & Daróczi, 2006: 157 , figs 11c,d”. Not Philopterus cursor var laticephalus Uchida, 1949 . Strigiphilus heterocerus ( Grube, 1851) : Price et al. 2003: 239.
Diagnosis. Among the Japanese species of Strigiphilus , this species is easily identified by (1) a short preconal area of the head with anterior margin slightly concave ( Figs 2, 5 View FIGURES 2–6 ), (2) sexually dimorphic antennae ( Figs 2, 5 View FIGURES 2–6 ), (3) the shape of dorsal anterior plates ( Figs 3, 6 View FIGURES 2–6 ), and (4) the morphology of the male genitalia ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 2–6 ).
Material examined. Type specimens. Ex Strix uralensis hondoensis : Syntypes of Strigiphilus fukuro : 1♂ (slide-mounted), Fukuro [= Strix uralensis hondoensis, in Katakana ], Nagano Prefecture [in Kanji], Japan, 24 Dec. 1916 ( ELKU); 2♂, 5♀, 9N (preserved in alcohol) same data ( ELKU). Slide-mounted syntypes are labeled as “(1) Syntype / Strigiphilus fukuro / Uchida, 1948 / det. Shimada & Yoshi, 2020; (2) Nagano Pref. / (24. xii. 1916)/ ex Strix uralensis ” ( ELKU); 1♀ (slide-mounted #010693510) (1) “ Strigiphilus fukuro Uchida, 1948 / T. Clay det./ PARA- TYPE ” [no holotype designation was made in the original description by Uchida (1948), therefore this specimen is actually a syntype]. (2) “ Strigiphilus fukuro n. sp. / Fukuro [in Katakana]/ Shinshu [in Kanji = Nagano Prefecture] 33” ( NMHL). Data taken from NHML online database accessed on 23 Apr. 2020 —https://data.nhm.ac.uk
Non-type specimens. Ex Strix uralensis spp .: 23♂, 48♀, 1N (slide-mounted) Amakubo , Tsukuba City, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan, 9 Feb. 2009, Haruhiko Asuka & Miyako Tsurumi ( SEHU) ; 26♂, 89♀, 40N (preserved in alcohol) same data ( YIO) ; 1♂, 1♀ (slide-mounted), Bibi , Chitose City, Hokkaido, Japan, 10 Mar. 2006, Miyako Tsurumi ( SEHU) ; 4♂, 18♀, 23N (preserved in alcohol) same data ( YIO) .
Japanese host: Strix uralensis hondoensis (Clark, 1907) .
Other hosts. Strix uralensis uralensis Pallas, 1771 , Strix uralensis liturata (Tengmalm, 1795) .
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
NHML |
Natural History Museum, Tripoli |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Strigiphilus heterocerus ( Grube, 1851 )
Shimada, Megumi & Yoshizawa, Kazunori 2020 |
Strigiphilus laticephalus Złotorzycka, 1974: 324
Adam, C. & Daroczi, S. J. 2006: 157 |
Price, R. D. & Hellenthal, R. A. & Palma, R. L. 2003: 239 |
Zlotorzycka, J. 1974: 324 |
Strigiphilus heterocerus ( Grube, 1851 )
Hopkins, G. H. E. & Clay, T. 1952: 339 |
Neodocophorus uralensis
Hopkins, G. H. E. & Clay, T. 1952: 340 |
Eichler, W. 1949: 15 |
Strigiphilus fukuro
Hopkins, G. H. E. & Clay, T. 1952: 339 |
Uchida, S. 1948: 307 |
Docophorus heterocerus
Grube, E. 1851: 469 |