Apanteles tachardiae Viereck, 1913
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4807.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7BEAE368-A259-4C88-BAF7-099DBAAB8926 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4343281 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A88789-FF2D-99DD-F197-F9BEFE27FDCA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Apanteles tachardiae Viereck, 1913 |
status |
|
Apanteles tachardiae Viereck, 1913 View in CoL
( Figures 80 View FIGURE 80 , 103 View FIGURE 103. 77–97 , 104q View FIGURE 104 )
Apanteles tachardiae Cameron, 1913: 109 View in CoL . Holotype ♀ (examined)— India [NHM, Fig. 104q View FIGURE 104 ]. Ayyar, 1920: 932; Mahdihassan, 1925: 80; Wilkinson, 1928: 119; Beeson & Chatterjee, 1935: 119; Beeson, 1941; 364; Negi, 1941: 20; De Saeger, 1942: 39; Thompson, 1953: 84; Mahdihassan, 1955: 100; Kulkarni, 1965: 319; Nixon, 1965: 72; Teotia, 1965: 522; You, 1981: 26–27; Chen & Song, 2004: 88.
Diagnosis. Body length 1.9 mm, fore wing length 2.7 mm. Body black, hind femur blackish. Ocelli small, posterior tangent to anterior ocellus just touching posterior ocelli, distance between fore and hind ocellus about as long as diameter of hind ocellus. Antenna distinctly longer than body length, penultimate flagellomere 1.8× longer than wide. Interspaces between punctures on disc of mesonotum slightly shorter than its diameter. Areola on propodeum narrow, depressed, V-shaped apically, without costulae. Pterostigma 3.0× as long as its widest part, vein 1-R1 1.2× longer than pterostigma, vein r 1.2× longer than vein 2-SR, distinctly angled at junction. T1 strongly constricted towards apex, 2.2× longer than hind width, turned-over part slightly shiny, weakly rugose, longitudinal channel narrow; T2 slightly rough, 3.0× wider than long in the middle; T3 1.6× longer than T2. Ovipositor sheath slightly longer than hind tibia.
Hosts. According to literature, Holcocera pulverea Meyr , Ephestia sp., Corcyra cephalonica Stainton , Eublemma amabilis Moore , Pseudohypatopa pulverea Meyr , Pseudohypatopa pulverea Meyr [ Laccifer lacca ] and Pseudohypatopa pulverea Meyr [ Laccifer mysorensis ] ( Yu et al. 2016).
Material examined. 1♀, Qingyuan , Zhejiang, 1985.VIII.1–2, Wu Quancong, No. 851971 ; 1♀, Mt. Gutian , Zhejiang, 1986.VII.22, Lou Xiaoming, No. 863401 ; 1♀, Xianrending, Mt. Tianmu , Zhejiang, 2011.VII.27, Song Shengnan, No. 201102171 .
Distribution. China (Hunan, Zhejiang); India.
Remarks. Characters of the examined specimens agree with the published description and the type specimen except T2 narrower ( Fig. 80e View FIGURE 80 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Apanteles tachardiae Viereck, 1913
Liu, Zhen, He, Jun-Hua, Chen, Xue-Xin & Gupta, Ankita 2020 |
Apanteles tachardiae
Chen, J. H. & Song, D. B. 2004: 88 |
You, L. S. & Xiong, S. L. & Tong, X. W. 1981: 26 |
Nixon, G. E. J. 1965: 72 |
Wilkinson, D. S. 1928: 119 |
Cameron, P. 1913: 109 |