Tomosvaryella acantha Motamedinia & Skevington

Motamedinia, Behnam, Skevington, Jeffrey H. & Kelso, Scott, 2021, Revision of Tomosvaryella Aczél (Diptera: Pipunculidae) in the Middle East, with description of 19 new species, Zootaxa 5002 (1), pp. 1-103 : 9-11

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5002.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5DC2A66A-3F04-42D0-8A8C-F0686054E556

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5122542

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A887D0-5F4A-FF83-FF3E-EDF5FDAA4C9B

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Tomosvaryella acantha Motamedinia & Skevington
status

sp. nov.

Tomosvaryella acantha Motamedinia & Skevington View in CoL sp. nov.

Figs 1A–E View FIGURE 1 , 46A View FIGURE 46 , 49 View FIGURE 49 , 65A–B View FIGURE 65

Diagnosis: This species can be recognized by the distinctive thorn-like projection on the hind trochanter ( Fig. 46A View FIGURE 46 ); surstyli slender and curved towards each other in dorsal view ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ), with a small projection at the base in lateral view ( Fig. 1D–E View FIGURE 1 three small ejaculatory ducts, one with some teeth in basal half ( Fig. 1D–E View FIGURE 1 ); phallic guide with a downward projection before apex in lateral view ( Fig. 1D–E View FIGURE 1 ). Based on the shape of the surstyli and phallus, this species is related to T. sylvatica ( Meigen, 1824) ( Földvári & De Meyer 1999: fig. 3A–D), T. subsylvatica Kazerani, Khaghaninia & Kehlmaier, 2017 ( Kazerani et al. 2017: fig. 3A–D) and T. littoralis ( Becker, 1897) ( Földvári & De Meyer 1999: fig. 2A–D). It differs by the distinct thorn-like projection (not spines) of the hind trochanter ( Fig. 46A View FIGURE 46 ). Tomosvaryella sylvatica , T. subsylvatica and T. littoralis ( Fig. 46B View FIGURE 46 ) have several spines on the hind trochanters.

Description: MALE: Body length (excluding antennae): 2.85 mm. Head. Scape, pedicel dark. Flagellum brown. Eyes meeting for a distance of 6–7 facets. Frons silver-gray pollinose. Vertex black, lacking pollinosity. Occiput dark with scattered short black setae. Thorax. Postpronotal lobe light yellow, gray pollinose without setae along upper margin. Prescutum and scutum black, prescutum slightly shining, scutum with a row of long supra-alar setae (up to 0.11 mm) and uniseriate rows of long intra-alar setae (up to 0.09 mm). Scutellum black, light-brown pollinose, with up to 18 thin setae along posterior margin (up to 0.11 mm). Subscutellum and pleura dark brown, silver-gray pollinose. Wing. Length: 3.5 mm. LW: MWW = 3.5. Wing almost entirely covered with microtrichia. Cross-vein r-m reaching cell dm at the middle. M 1 moderately undulating in middle. Halter length: 0.37 mm. Whitish, dark at base. Legs. Dark but narrowly yellow at apex of femora and base of tibiae, gray pollinose. Mid coxa with 3–4 anterior setae. Hind trochanter with a distinct thorn-like projection (not spine) ( Fig. 46A View FIGURE 46 ). Hind femur with two rows of long setae on anterior and two rows on posterior side. Hind femur with 1–2 wrinkled indentations in basal quarter. Tibiae with two rows of short setae on anterior and three rows on posterior side. Hind tibia with 1–2 wrinkled indentations in the middle. Tarsi light brown, gray pollinose. Claws white in basal half. Abdomen. Ground color dark brown. Tergite 1 entirely gray pollinose with 8–9 brown long lateral setae (up to 0.16 mm). Tergites 2–5 with scattered yellowish setae (up to 0.08 mm). Sternites light brown laterally and dark brown centrally, gray pollinose. Syntergosternite 8 with scattered long dark setae. Genitalia. Genital capsule in dorsal view: epandrium and surstyli brown, gray pollinose. Epandrium wider than long (MLE:MWE = 0.72). Surstyli rather symmetrical, elongated and slender, slightly curved to each other at apical third ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ). Genital capsule in ventral view: gonopods small and wide, equal in height, hypandrium broad, subepandrial sclerite wide basically ( Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 ). Genital capsule in lateral view: both surstyli gently curved to sternite, with a small projection in basal towards hypandrium ( Figs 1D–E View FIGURE 1 ). Phallic guide long, pointed apically with a small projection pointed towards hypandrium ( Fig. 1D–E View FIGURE 1 ); phallus with three small ejaculatory ducts, one bearing some saw-like teeth in basal half ( Fig. 1D–E View FIGURE 1 ). Ejaculatory apodeme tube-like, bent, with a bulb in its middle ( Fig. 1C View FIGURE 1 ). FEMALE: unknown.

Etymology: The specific name is derived from the Latin word ‘acantha’, meaning thorn, referring to thorn-like projection on its hind trochanter.

Specimen examined: HOLOTYPE: ISRAEL: Har Hermon , 33°18’N, 35°46’E, 1500–1600m a.s.l., 6.vi.2002, L. Friedman, JSS51689 (1♂, TAU). GoogleMaps

Distribution: Israel ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 ).

Notes: Based on the DNA barcode, this species is genetically most similar to T. sylvatica (4.6% pairwise divergence) (Supplementary Table 1).

TAU

Tel-Aviv University

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Pipunculidae

Genus

Tomosvaryella

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF