Diochus guizhouensis Shuai, Nozaki & Tang, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4908.2.8 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9C99E6A4-6507-426E-B622-79129F1C9601 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4448109 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A89857-A952-FF8E-6A91-92F3FB87F9B8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Diochus guizhouensis Shuai, Nozaki & Tang |
status |
sp. nov. |
2. Diochus guizhouensis Shuai, Nozaki & Tang View in CoL , new species
( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1–3 , 16–22 View FIGURES 16–29 )
Type material. Holotype. China: Guizhou: ♁, glued on a card with labels as follows: “ China: Guizhou Province, Libo county , Maolan N. R., Bizuo , 25°16’59’’N, 108°03’18’’E, 587m, mixed leaf litter, sifted, 28.IV.2017, Jiang, Jiang, Hu, Liu & Zhang leg. ” “ Holotype / Diochus guizhouensis / Shuai, Nozaki & Tang” [red handwritten label] ( SHNU) GoogleMaps . Paratypes. 1♁, same data as for the holotype ( SHNU); 1♀ GoogleMaps , Libo county , Maolan N. R ., Bizuo , 25°17’16’’N, 108°04’18’’E, 478–507m, mixed leaf litter, sifted, 26.IV.2017, Jiang, Jiang, Hu, Liu & Zhang leg. ( SHNU) GoogleMaps .
Description. Body dark brown, head and elytra slightly darker, portions along the posterior margins of abdominal segments lighter, appendages reddish yellow with antennal segments 4–8 slightly darker.
BL: 5.9–6.1 mm, FL: 2.9–3.0 mm. HL: 0.78–0.81 mm, HW: 0.60–0.62 mm, EyL: 0.16–0.22 mm, TL: 0.46–0.48 mm, PL: 0.99–1.07 mm, PW: 0.83–0.87 mm, EL: 1.01–1.03 mm, EW: 1.07–1.09 mm, SL: 0.68–0.69 mm.
Head 1.27–1.31 times as long as wide, tempora slightly widened posterad, posterior angles rounded, eyes 0.38–0.50 times as long as tempora. Dorsal surface shiny, microsculpture distinct and transverse, punctation coarse and sparse. Mandibles ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 16–29 ) falciform, each with a large tooth and a small tooth on inner margin. Antennae slender, antennomere 3 distinctly longer than 2 (ratio: 1.18–1.25). Gular sutures confluent at about basal 1/4, then extended to base.
Pronotum 1.20–1.23 times as long as wide, wider than head, lateral margins widened posteriad to basal 1/3, then convergent backwards, anterior and posterior angles broadly rounded. Dorsal surface shiny without microsculpture. Disc with one row of punctures composing of 3 or 4 large punctures on each side of the midline and 1 or 2 additional punctures outside of each row of punctures.
Elytra 0.93–0.95 times as long as wide, shorter than pronotum at suture, lateral margins divergent posteriad, dorsal surface shiny without microsculpture; each elytron with a row of 5 punctures near suture and a row of 5 punctures in median row.
First four segments of protarsi moderately dilated in both sexes.
Abdomen with dense and fine punctation and with distinct microsculpture, posterior margin of tergite VII with distinct palisade fringe.
Male. Head with a small round elevation between the eyes; sternite VIII ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 16–29 ) with posterior margin emarginated at middle; sternite IX ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 16–29 ) symmetrical, widest near the middle; aedeagus ( Figs 16–18 View FIGURES 16–29 ) with parameres as long as 1/3 length of the median lobe, internal structures sclerotized, consisting of paired apical sclerites and a single Y-shaped basal plate.
Female. Head without a small spot elevation between eyes; sternite VIII with posterior margin rounded; spermatheca ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 16–29 ) sclerotized, very long, with three bends.
Distribution. China (Guizhou).
Remarks. The new species is similar to D. japonicus Cameron, 1930 in appearance, but can be distinguished from the latter by male frons with a small round elevation between the eyes, male sternite VIII without coarse setae and different morphology of aedeagus and spermatheca.
Etymology. The specific name is derived from the locality, Guizhou, of the species.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |