Corinnomma simplex Zhang, Jin & Zhang, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5254.4.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:48C9CAB2-8946-4815-9D44-87C5CD389718 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7734276 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AA87CC-FF81-8B3F-FCF9-09F3FE82E74C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Corinnomma simplex Zhang, Jin & Zhang, 2022 |
status |
|
Corinnomma simplex Zhang, Jin & Zhang, 2022
Fig. 5E View FIGURE 5
Corinnomma simplex Zhang, Jin & Zhang, 2022: 247 View Cited Treatment , figs 5A–D, 6A–E, 9C–D, 10C–D (♁ ♀).
Corinnomma severum Sankaran, 2021: 548 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , figs 7A–F, 8A–C (♁; misidentified).
Diagnosis. Corinnomma simplex is closely related to C. severum in the general morphology of the genitalia, but the males can be separated from those of the latter species by the short embolus (vs. comparatively long in C. severum ) and the embolus directed at 12-o’clock in ventral view (vs. 1-o’clock in C. severum ) (cf. Fig. 5E View FIGURE 5 with 5D), and the females by S-shaped anterior spermathecae II (vs. inverted J-shaped in C. severum ) (cf. Zhang et al. 2022: fig. 6E with Zhang et al. 2022: fig. 4E).
Description. See Sankaran (2021) and Zhang et al. (2022).
Distribution. China, India (Kerala, Tamil Nadu) ( Sankaran 2021; Zhang et al. 2022).
Remarks. Even though Zhang et al. (2022) pointed out the misidentification of C. simplex in Sankaran (2021), which was described as C. severum , they did not mention the record of this species in India, and is updated herewith.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Corinnomma simplex Zhang, Jin & Zhang, 2022
Sankaran, Pradeep M. 2023 |