Protarchanara brevilinea impudica (Staudinger, 1892)

Volynkin, Anton V., Matov, Alexej Yu., Gyulai, Péter & Behounek, Gottfried, 2014, A revision of the genus Protarchanara Beck, 1999 with description of a new genus and three new species (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Xyleninae), Zootaxa 3755 (2), pp. 165-178 : 171

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3755.2.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6E3EB860-21C2-4F44-816E-DCCDAB6ECB0D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6134462

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AB4847-FFBE-FF84-4992-5CC7FD2FFA4C

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Protarchanara brevilinea impudica (Staudinger, 1892)
status

 

Protarchanara brevilinea impudica (Staudinger, 1892) View in CoL stat. n.

( Figs 27–30 View FIGURES 21 – 30 , 45, 46, 52 View FIGURES 43 – 52 )

Nonagria impudica Staudinger, 1892 , in Romanoff (ed.), Mémoires sur les Lépidoptéres 6: 470, pl. 9, fig. 3 (Type locality: Russian far East, Khabarovsk (“Chabarofka“).

Material examined. A lectotype is hereby designated for Nonagria impudica : male, "Sutschansk, go. Dörr." / "Origin" / "ex coll. Staudinger 2/6" / "52" / " Nonagria impudica Stg. " / " Paratypus ", Slide 12127GB Behounek (Coll. NKMB); Paralectotype: female, "3/8 [18]77, Chabarowka, Amur" / "Amur Hed." / "Origin" / " Paratypus ", Slide 12153GB Behounek (Coll. NKMB). Other material examined. 1 male, 1 female, [Russian Far East, Khabarovsk area], Amur, Coll. Great Prince Nikolaj Mikhajlovich (Coll. ZISP); 1 female, [Primorie area, Vladivostok vicinity], De Friz peninsula, 20.vii.1955, leg. A. Kurentzov (Coll. ZISP); 3 females, [Primorie area], Khasan lake, 25–26.viii.1966, leg. A. Lisetskij, ex coll., A.V. Nekrasov (Coll. ZISP). Gen. preparates Matov (male, female).

Diagnosis. Wingspan 32–34 mm, length of forewing 15–16 mm. Externally ( Figs 27–30 View FIGURES 21 – 30 ) differs from P. brevilinea brevilinea ( Figs 23–26 View FIGURES 21 – 30 ) by somewhat broader forewing and paler wing colouration. In the male genitalia P. brevilinea impudica ( Fig. 45, 46 View FIGURES 43 – 52 ) differs from P. brevilinea brevilinea ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 43 – 52 ) by shorter uncus and penicular lobes, somewhat broader cucullus, somewhat narrower and more sclerotised vesica. The female genitalia ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 43 – 52 ) differ from those of P. brevilinea brevilinea ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 43 – 52 ) by longer apophyses posteriores, broader sclerotised margin of antrum, broader but shorter ductus bursae and broader appendix bursae.

Distribution. Transbaikalia, Russian Far East.

ZISP

Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Noctuidae

Genus

Protarchanara

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF