Tetragonoderus laevigatus Chaudoir, 1876
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5169980 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AC023A-AD2E-FFC5-E9DE-6E41FD45A2ED |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Tetragonoderus laevigatus Chaudoir |
status |
|
Tetragonoderus laevigatus Chaudoir View in CoL
Fig. 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A-B, 6 and 7
Tetragonoderus laevigatus Chaudoir View in CoL : 1876: 46. Type Material: HOLOTYPE, male, labeled: “TYPE” [red paper]; “ Tetragonoderus View in CoL / laevigatus/ J. Mateu det. 1979” [MNHP]. Type Area: Montevideo, Uruguay. — Csiki 1932: 1298.— Blackwelder 1944: 52.— Lorenz 2005: 453.
Tetragonoderus unicolor Chaudoir View in CoL : 1876: 47. Type Material: LECTOTYPE (here designated) male, without labels (see “Notes about type material” below). Type Area: state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Junior homonym of Tetragonoderus unicolor Gemminger and Harold View in CoL : 1868: 144. — Csiki 1932: 1296.— Blackwelder 1944: 52.— Lorenz 2005: 453.
Tetragonoderus chaudoiri Liebke View in CoL : 1928: 129. Replacement name for Tetragonoderus unicolor Chaudoir View in CoL : 1876: 47. — Csiki 1932: 1296.— Blackwelder 1944: 52.— Lorenz 2005: 453. NEW SYNONOMY.
Notes about type material. In the MNHP is a
single specimen associated with the box label
“ laevigatus Chaudoir Montevideo Livori Mus de
Genoa” which is the holotype. Additionally, in the
MNHP associated with the box label “unicolor
Chaud. Brésil Mines Geraës Squires” are two speci-
mens, a male and a female. Chaudoir in his origi-
nal description stated he had two examples from
the province of Rio de Janeiro, collected by Squires.
The specimens associated with the box label were
collected by Squires, and the assumption is that
the wrong locality data were placed on the box
label (Mines Geraës [sic], rather than Rio de
Janeiro Province). The male specimen is selected
and here designated as LECTOTYPE. The male
lectotype of T. unicolor was dissected, and the
genitalia match those of T. laevigatus . Addition-
ally, the elytral microsculpture of T. unicolor
matches that of T. laevigatus . Hence these names
are synonymous.
Recognition. See the key, and figures noted above. The broad phallus with broadly triangular apical area is definitive. Specimens of this species Figure 5. Line drawings of male genitalia of with unicolorous elytra could be confused with Tetragonoderus species. A , C, E and G, dorsal aspect; B, other southern South American Tetragonoderus D, F and H, right lateral aspect. A-B) T. laevigatus species exhibiting this feature, for example, T. Chaudoir. C-D) T. deuvei , new species. E-F) T. viridis Dejean and T. chalceus Chaudoir. How- quadriguttatus Dejean. G-H) T. subfasciatus Putzeys.
Legend: aa, apical area; bl, basal lobe; bo, basal opening; ever, specimens of these two species have dark
ea, endophallic armature; ma, median area; om, ostial legs, rather than the pale ones characteristic of membrane; oo, ostial opening; poa, periostial area; and the quadriguttatus assemblage. Further, males sh, shaft. Scale bar = 1 mm. of T. viridis and T. chalceus have only midtarsomeres 1-3 with adhesive vestiture (tarsomeres 1-4 of mid-tarsus with adhesive vestiture in the quadriguttatus assemblage), and abdominal sternum VII is slightly emarginate medially in T. viridis (distinctly notched in quadriguttatus assemblage males). Male specimens of T. chalceus have abdominal sternum VII rounded, not notched.
Description. See Table 1 for values for standardized body length (SBL) and ratios Hl/Hw and Pl/Pw.
Elytra. Bicolored (Fig. 2A) or uniformly dark, with microsculpture mesh pattern isodiametric, sculpticells relatively uniform (Fig. 3A and 4A); discal setigerous punctures relatively small, not foveate.
Male genitalia. Phallus (Fig. 5A and 5B) in dorsal aspect broad, relatively straight, medial area of shaft widened from its base to periostial area, and narrowed markedly distad rather broadly triangular short apical area, apex obtusely pointed; periostial area short, less than one third length of shaft; in lateral aspect shaft moderately angled, surface without or with parallel ridges (indicated in Fig. 5A by scalloped margins of distal part of median area and proximal part of periostial area), apical area short, moderately triangular; ventral surface smooth. Endophallus, inverted, with prominent microtrichial field, band-like in appearance in both dorsal and right lateral aspects, within medial area.
Notes about variation. A single specimen of T. laevigatus from Paraguay exhibits the same type of elytral microsculpture mesh pattern as observed in T. quadriguttatus . The Paraguay specimen is a male, and the species determination was established on the basis of its genitalic features.
Of the total material examined, only two specimens from Brazil and four from Paraguay had the pale markings of the elytra much darker than typical (Fig. 2 A), and the holotype of T. unicolor and five
Montevideo, Uruguay specimens had completely
dark elytra with no visible pale markings.
Collecting notes and habitat. In Florida, one
specimen was taken on a Datura Linnaeus (Solan-
aceae) plant, others in a residential backyard, and
in a sandy/grassy community area. In Bolivia,
specimens were collected during daylight in an
unshaded sand pit, resting among the roots of dead,
standing plants, and in tropical transition forest,
in leaf litter. These sites were about a kilometer
from the nearest permanent water source. Other
Floridian and South American specimens were
taken at UV and mercury vapor lights.
Geographical distribution. (Fig. 6-7). The
natural geographical range (Fig. 5) of this species
extends from southern Uruguay and central Ar-
gentina northward to mid-central Brazil on the
Atlantic coast, and along the southern and west-
ern edges of the Amazon basin. The Florida records
( Fig. 7 View Figure 7 ) probably represent a recent point intro-
duction, probably through commerce, with subse-
quent dispersal by flight. We postulate then, that
T. laevigatus is established in Florida, with the
likelihood of further range expansion.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Tetragonoderus laevigatus Chaudoir
Shpeley, Danny & Ball, George E. 2008 |
Tetragonoderus laevigatus Chaudoir
Lorenz, W. 2005: 453 |
Blackwelder, R. E. 1944: 52 |
Csiki, E. 1932: 1298 |
Tetragonoderus unicolor
Lorenz, W. 2005: 453 |
Blackwelder, R. E. 1944: 52 |
Csiki, E. 1932: 1296 |
Tetragonoderus chaudoiri
Lorenz, W. 2005: 453 |
Blackwelder, R. E. 1944: 52 |
Csiki, E. 1932: 1296 |