Dolichogenidea Viereck, 1911

Liu, Zhen, He, Jun-Hua, Chen, Xue-Xin, Gupta, Ankita & Moghaddam, Mostafa Ghafouri, 2019, The ultor - group of the genus Dolichogenidea Viereck (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) from China with the descriptions of thirty-nine new species, Zootaxa 4710 (1), pp. 1-134 : 10-13

Key to species of the ultor- group of the genus Dolichogenidea Viereck from China

1. Propodeum without costulae …................................................. D. hyblaeae ( Wilkinson, 1928)

- Propodeum with costulae (e.g. Figs 5f , 6e , 7d ) …............................................................ 2

2. T2 much wider than apical width of T1; posterior tangent to anterior ocellus passing far beyond posterior pair of ocelli ..... .................................................................................. D. amaris ( Nixon, 1967)

- T2 at most slightly wider than apical width of T1 (e.g. Fig. 21d ); posterior tangent to anterior ocellus touching posterior pair of ocelli ............................................................................................... 3

3. Hind femur yellow to reddish yellow, at most infuscate (e.g. Fig. 4a ) ............................................. 4

- Hind femur blackish brown to black (e.g. Fig. 17a ) .......................................................... 38

4. Ovipositor sheath distinctly shorter than hind tibia (e.g. Fig. 27i ) ................................................ 5

- Ovipositor sheath not shorter than hind tibia (e.g. Fig. 54a ) .................................................... 23

5. T2 strongly rugose or rugulose (e.g. Fig. 4h ) ................................................................ 6

- T2 smooth to almost smooth (e.g. Fig. 3g ) ................................................................. 13

6. T3 hardly longer or slightly shorter than T2 medio-longitudinally (e.g. Fig. 4g ) ..................................... 7

- T3 distinctly longer than T2 medio-longitudinally (e.g. Fig. 48h ) ............................................... 10

7. Pterostigma with basal spot ( Fig. 26c ); T3 strongly rugose ( Figs 26a , 70f ) ............... D. hemitheae ( Wilkinson, 1928)

- Pterostigma without basal spot (e.g. Fig. 4b ); T3 totally smooth (e.g. Fig. 4h ) ...................................... 8

8. Ovipositor with a distinct apical attenuation; three posterior fields on propodeum rugose ( Fig. 70 ) .... D. prisca ( Nixon, 1967)

- Ovipositor tapering, curved, without distinct apical attenuation; three posterior fields on propodeum nearly polished ....... 9

9. Ovipositor sheath 1.2× longer than hind basitarsus; disc of mesonotum strongly and coarsely punctate, interspaces less than half of puncture diameter ( Fig. 4g ) .............................................. D. altithoracica Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Ovipositor sheath at most as long as hind basitarsus; disc of mesonotum sparsely punctate, interspaces more than half of puncture diameter ( Figs 21e , 70e ) ......................................................... D. expulsa ( Turner, 1919)

10. Ovipositor with a distinct apical attenuation ( Fig. 44e ); wings weakly milky ........... D. multicolor Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Ovipositor tapering, curved without apical attenuation (e.g. Fig. 48c ); wings hyaline ............................... 11

11. Pterostigma with whitish basal spot ( Fig. 48c ); T2 nearly 5.0× wider than long in middle ( Fig. 48f ); hind femur stout, 2.3× longer than wide ( Fig. 48c ) ...................................................... D. ovata Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Pterostigma without whitish basal spot (e.g. Fig. 61b ); T2 at most 3.7× wider than long in middle ( Fig. 61g ); hind femur of normal size, over 3.0× longer than wide (e.g. Fig. 61i ) ....................................................... 12

12. Tegula yellowish brown ( Fig. 61f ); vein r of fore wing slightly shorter than width of pterostigma ( Fig. 61b ); spurs of hind tibia equal in length, nearly half length of hind basitarsus ........................... D. transcarinata Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Tegula black ( Fig. 7e ); vein r of fore wing a little longer than width of pterostigma ( Fig. 7b ); spurs of hind tibia unequal in length, outer spur 1/3 length of hind basitarsus ......................................... D. asotae ( Watanabe, 1932)

13. T1 posteriorly with weakly or distinctly widening sides (e.g. Fig. 3g ) ............................................ 14

- T1 parallel-sided or with weakly converging sides (e.g. Fig. 35e ) ............................................... 16

14. Horizontal surface of T1 mostly polished ( Fig. 3g ); pterostigma pale yellowish brown ( Fig. 3b ) ........................ ...................................................................... D. alophogaster Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Horizontal surface of T1 nearly entirely rugose ( Fig. 60g ); pterostigma brown ( Fig. 60f )........................... 15

15. Pterostigma blackish brown ( Fig. 60f ); T2 without transverse striae medio-apically ( Fig. 60g ); T1 without longitudinal strie ( Fig. 60g ) [attacking Porthesia taiwana Shiraki ] ...................................... D. taiwanensis ( Sonan, 1942)

- Pterostigma uniformly reddish brown ( Figs 14b , 70d ); T2 with distinct transverse striae medio-apically ( Figs 14g , 70d ); apical third of T1 finely striate ( Figs 14g , 70d ) [attacking Cania bilinear Walker ] ................ .. D. caniae ( Wilkinson, 1928)

16. T1 more or less constricted posteriorly; T2 subtriangular or crescent-shaped ...................................... 17

- T1 nearly parallel-sided; T2 distinctly transverse, two to three times as wide as long ................................ 18

17. T3 1.5× longer than T2 ( Fig. 35e ); ovipositor sheath 0.5× length of hind basitarsus ( Fig. 35i ); vein cu-a of hind wing straight and perpendicular to 1-1A ( Fig. 35b ) ......................................... D. lincostulata Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- T3 slightly longer than T2 ( Fig. 31g ); ovipositor sheath 0.8× as long as hind femur ( Fig. 31a ); vein cu-a of hind wing slightly incurved ( Fig. 31d ) ......................................................... D. infirmus Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

18. Body 1.4 mm; ovipositor thin and straight, without attenuation ( Fig. 43c ); sulcus between T2 and T3 indistinct ( Fig. 43d ) ........................................................................... D. minuscula Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Body 2.0 mm; ovipositor thick and more or less curved; sulcus between T2 and T3 distinct .......................... 19

19. Horizontal surface of T 1 in greater part smooth and polished; T2 about 0.5× length of T3 medio-longitudially ............ .............................................................................. D. prodeniae (Viereck, 1912)

- Horizontal surface of T1 rugose; T2 distinctly greater than 0.5× length of T3 medio- longitudially ..................... 20

20. Wings distinctly brownish ( Fig. 46b, c ); punctures on posterior part of mesonotum rather sparse ( Fig. 46d ); head distinctly transverse in dorsal view, 2.3× as wide as long ( Fig. 46h ) .............................. D. obsoleta Liu & Chen , sp. n

- Wings colourless; punctures on posterior part of mesonotum denser; head weakly transverse in dorsal view, 1.6–2.0× as wide as long ........................................................................................... ... 21

21. Lateral margins of basal three tergites whitish yellow to yellow (e.g. Fig. 16c ); ovipositor sheath at least as long as hind basitarsus (e.g. Fig. 16a ) .................................................................................... 22

- Lateral margins of basal three tergites brown ( Fig. 27h ); ovipositor sheath distinctly shorter than hind basitarsus ( Fig. 27i ) .. ......................................................................... D. hemituba Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

22. Pterostigma with a whitish basal spot ( Fig. 16b ); metasoma 1.2× longer than mesosoma.... D. clausa Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Pterostigma without whitish basal spot ( Fig. 51b ); metasoma a little shorter than mesosoma ( Fig. 51a ) ........................................................................................... D. pentgona Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

23. T1 polished and virtually without sculpture ( Figs 36e , 70i ); wings brownish ( Fig. 36f ) ... D. lissos ( Nixon, 1967) , comb. nov.

- T1 at most becoming polished and unsculptured toward apex; wings hyaline...................................... 24

24. T2 strongly rugose to rugulose .......................................................................... 25

- T2 smooth to almost smooth ............................................................................ 33

25. Pterostigma brown with a whitish basal spot ............................................................... 26

- Pterostigma evenly brown or whitish without basal spot ...................................................... 28

26. Metasoma nearly yellow to entirely slightly reddish yellow ( Fig. 40h ); T2 crescent-shaped, poorly defined ( Fig. 40h ); vein cu-a of hind wing straight ( Fig. 40f )................................................ D. lunatus Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Metasoma black, at most yellowish brown ventrally and apically; T2 distinctly transverse, 3.0× to 5.5× wider than long in middle, well-defined; vein cu-a of hind wing curved ......................................................... 27

27. T2 transverse, 5.5× wider than long in middle ( Fig. 34h ); mesonotum without any trace of striation medio-apically ( Fig. 34f ); penultimate antennomere cubic .............................................. .. D. latitergita Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- T2 less transverse, 3.0× wider than long in middle ( Fig. 25f ); mesonotum with a trace of striations medio-apically ( Fig. 25g ); penultimate antennomere 1.7× longer than wide ................................. .. D. gleditsia Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

28. Pterostigma whitish with dark border ( Figs 1b , 70a 2 ); ovipositor with an apical attenuation; first discal cell of fore wing not wider than high ( Fig. 1b ); hind femur weakly infuscate ( Fig. 1a ) .................... D. acron ( Nixon, 1967) , comb. nov.

- Pterostigma yellow to brown ............................................................................ 29

29. T1 posteriorly with weakly or distinctly widening sides ....................................................... 30

- T1 parallel-sided or with weakly converging sides ........................................................... 32

30. Ovipositor sheath shorter than hind tarsus; areolation on propodeum flask-shaped or lozenge-shaped and open anteriorly; vein r and 2-SR of fore wing angled at meeting ................................................................. 31

- Ovipositor sheath as long as hind tarsus; areolation on propodeum hexagonal and closed anteriorly ( Fig. 11e ); vein r and 2-SR of fore wing curved at meeting ( Fig. 11g ) ......................................... D. belippicola ( Liu & You, 1988)

31. Ovipositor with an apical attenuation equal to about length of hind basitarsus; areolation on propodeum pentagonal-shaped ( Fig. 70g 3 ); hind tarsomere without longitudinal carinae inside ....................... .. D. heterusiae ( Wilkinson, 1928)

- Ovipositor without attenuation; areolation on propodeum flask-shaped ( Fig. 56g ); hind tarsomere with longitudinal carinae inside .................................................................... .. D. singularis Yang & You, 2002

32. First discal cell of fore wing slightly higher than wide ( Fig. 63b ); scutellum with dense punctures ( Fig. 63f ) .............. ........................................................................ D. vadosulcus Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- First discal cell of fore wing slightly wider than high ( Fig. 9b ); scutellum with sparse punctures, commonly impunctate ( Figs 9f , 70b 1 )....................................................... .. D. bambusae ( Wilkinson, 1928) , comb. nov.

33. Body reddish brown ( Fig. 54a ); ovipositor sheath distinctly broad at apex; vein cu-a of hind wing straight ( Fig. 54d ) ....... ......................................................................... D. rectivena Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Body usually black (except metasoma of D. numenes mostly yellow); ovipositor sheath not broad at apex; vein cu-a of hind wing more or less curved ............................................................................... 34

34. Metasoma mostly yellow with lateral edges of T1 dark brown ( Figs. 45h , 70k 1 ); propodeum long ( Fig. 54e ); ovipositor thick, with down-curved, attenuated tip .................................................... D. numenes ( Nixon, 1967)

- Metasoma reddish yellow to black; propodeum wider; ovipositor usually without attenuation (at most with a weakly differentiated apical attenuation) ................................................................................ 35

35 Hind femur usually more or less infuscate ................................................................. 36

- Hind femur entirely yellow ............................................................................. 37

36. Ovipositor without apical attenuation; ovipositor sheath 1.5× longer than hind tibia; disc of mesonotum with dense punctures ........................................................................... D. inquisitor ( Wilkinson, 1928)

- Ovipositor with a long, but weakly differentiated apical attenuation; ovipositor sheath about equal in length to hind femur, but possibly just longer ( Fig. 50a ); disc of mesonotum with well separated punctures ( Fig. 50c ) ...... D. parasae ( Rohwer, 1922)

37. Vein r of fore wing longer than width of pterostigma ( Fig. 59b ); T2 half-length of T3 medio-longitudinally ( Fig. 59f ); lateral carinae of areolation on propodeum strong ( Fig. 59d ) .................................. D. stantoni ( Ashmead, 1904)

- Vein r of fore wing shorter than width of pterostigma; T2 0.7 length of T3 medio-longitudinally; lateral carinae of areolation on propodeum weak ........................................................ .. D. artusicarina Song & Chen, 2004

38. Ovipositor sheath shorter than hind femur ................................................................. 39

- Ovipositor sheath long, at least as long as hind femur ........................................................ 50

39. T2 smooth to almost smooth ............................................................................ 40

- T2 strongly rugose or rugulose .......................................................................... 41

40. Ovipositor sheath distinctly longer than hind basitarsus ( Fig. 8f ); vein r of fore wing evenly rounded at the meeting with 2-SR ( Fig. 8b ); T1 distinctly, but not strongly, constricted at apex ( Fig. 8e ) ..................... D. atarsi Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Ovipositor sheath a little shorter than hind basitarsus ( Fig. 57i ); vein r and 2-SR of fore wing angled at meeting ( Fig. 57b ); base of T1 narrower than apex ( Fig. 57f )............................................... .. D. sonani ( Watanabe, 1932)

41. Ovipositor sheath longer than hind basitarsus ............................................................... 42

- Ovipositor sheath shorter than, at most as long as hind basitarsus ............................................... 47

42. Pterostigma more or less whitish medially, with darker borders ................................................. 43

- Pterostigma evenly yellowish brown to brown .............................................................. 45

43. T2 nearly equal with length of T3 medio-longitudinally ( Fig. 13e ); T1 with a short longitudinal carina medially ( Fig. 13e ); ovipositor thick, with a distinct apical attenuation ............................. .. D. brevicarinata Chen & Song, 2004

- T2 distinctly shorter than T3 medio-longitudinally; T1 without longitudinal carina medially; ovipositor thin, with a weakly differentiated apical attenuation ............................................................................ 44

44. Areolation on propodeum wide ( Fig. 49i ); T1 with arched sides ( Fig. 49f ); face more transverse ( Fig. 49c ) ................................................................................... D. parallodorsum Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Areolation on propodeum narrow ( Fig. 12g ); T1 parallel-sided ( Fig. 12i ); face less transverse ( Fig. 12h ) ................. ...................................................................... D. breviattenuata Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

45. Temple dull without punctures ( Fig. 38g ); pterostigma small, 3.0× as long as its widest part ( Fig. 38c ); posterior tangent to anterior ocellus hardly touching posterior pair of ocelli ( Fig. 38g ) .................... D. longialba Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Temple shiny with shallow punctures; pterostigma large, less than 3.0× as long as its widest part; posterior tangent to anterior ocellus touching posterior pair of ocelli ................................................................... 46

46. Scutellar sulcus strongly and evenly curved ( Fig. 22h ); areolation on propodeum open at anterior end ( Fig. 22e ); spines on outer side of hind tibia acuminated ............................................... .. D. flexisulcus Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Scutellar sulcus slightly curved downward medially and upward laterally ( Fig. 24h ); areolation on propodeum closed at anterior end ( Fig. 24c ); spines on outer side of hind tibia stout ............................ D. fluctisulcus Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

47. Hind femur infuscate; apical attenuation of ovipositor almost as long as the thickened, basal part and as long as hind basitarsus .................................................................................... D. aso ( Nixon, 1967)

- Hind femur nigrescent to black; apical attenuation of ovipositor distinctly shorter than hind basitarsus .................. 48

48. T1 distinctly broadened towards apex ( Fig. 17e ); T2 as long as T3 medio-longitudinally ( Fig. 17e ); apical attenuation of ovipositor almost 1.5× longer than the thickened, basal part ( Fig. 17h ) .................. D. conpuncta Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- T1 parallel-sided or weakly constricted posteriorly; T2 usually shorter than T3 medio-longitudinally; apical attenuation of ovipositor at most as long as the thickened, basal part ........................................................ 49

49. Vein r of fore wing evenly rounded with 2-SR ( Figs 30f , 70h ); apical two-thirds of hind tibia, red testaceous; T2 smoother than apical two thirds of T1 ( Figs 30e , 71h).......................................... D. hyposidrae ( Wilkinson, 1928)

- Vein r of fore wing angled with 2-SR ( Fig. 65b ); apical one fourth of hind tibia, red testaceous; T2 strongly rugose as T1 ( Fig. 65f ) ...................................................................... .. D. wangi Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

50. Ovipositor sheath longer than 1.3× length of hind tibia ....................................................... 51

- Ovipositor sheath at most 1.3× length of hind tibia .......................................................... 57

51. T2 strongly rugose to rugulose .......................................................................... 52

- T2 smooth to almost smooth ............................................................................ 54

52. Areola oval-shaped; T3 2.0× longer than T2 medio-longitudinally .......................... D. locastrae (You & Tong)

- Areola pentagonal-shaped; T3 about 1.5× longer thanT2 medio-longitudinally..................................... 53

53. Pterostigma with a whitish basal spot ( Fig. 37c ); lateral carinae of areolation very narrow ( Fig. 37d ); ovipositor sheath 1.4× length of hind tibia ( Fig. 37e ) ................................................... D. lobesia Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Pterostigma light brown with darker border ( Fig. 39b ); lateral carinae of areolation wide ( Fig. 39c ); ovipositor sheath 1.8× length of hind tibia ( Fig. 39e ) ............................................. .. D. longimagna Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

54. Pterostigma colourless with dark border ( Fig. 47b ); sulcus between T2 and T3 indistinct laterally ( Fig. 47h ) .............. ......................................................................... D. opacifinis Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Pterostigma entirely yellowish brown to dark reddish brown; sulcus between T2 and T3 distinct entirely ................ 55

55. T1 largely polished ( Fig. 6h ); parts along apical margin of disc of mesonotum impunctate ( Fig. 6d ); vannal lobe beyond its widest part of hind wing straight ( Fig. 6g ) ...................................... D. apicurvus Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- T1 largely rugose; disc of mesonotum punctate; vannal lobe beyond its widest part of hind wing more or less convex ..... 56

56. Pterostigma yellowish brown, adiaphanous; apical antennomeres closely jointed; punctures on disc of mesonotum small .... ........................................................................... D. longituba Song & Chen, 2004

- Pterostigma reddish brown, hyaline ( Fig. 55b ); apical antennomeres loosely jointed; punctures on disc of mesonotum large ( Fig. 55d ) ................................................................ D. scabipuncta Chen & Song, 2004

57. Pterostigma nearly colourless, with darker border ........................................................... 58

- Pterostigma dark, at most with a whitish basal spot .......................................................... 62

58. First discal cell of fore wing distinctly wider than high ....................................................... 59

- First discal cell of fore wing at most weakly wider than high ................................................... 61

59. Vein r and 2-SR of fore wing curved at meeting ( Fig. 10b ) ............................... D. baoris ( Wilkinson, 1930)

- Vein r and 2-SR of fore wing distinctly angled at meeting ..................................................... 60

60. T2 transverse, 4.0× wider than long in middle ( Fig. 23h ); penultimate antennomere cubic; disc of mesonotum with large, dense punctures, spaces between punctures weakly rugulose on posterior imaginary notaulic courses ( Fig. 23d ) ....................................................................................... D. flexitergita Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- T2 less transverse, at most 3.3× wider than long in middle ( Fig. 29i ); penultimate antennomere 1.7× longer than wide; disc of mesonotum with sparse, discrete punctures, largely absent along posterior margin and medio-posteriorly ( Fig. 29f ) ................................................................................ D. hexagona Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

61. T1 indistinctly constricted posteriorly ( Fig. 41h ); T1 with a median trough on apical third ( Fig. 41h ); areolation on propodeum open at anterior end ( Fig. 41e )................................................ D. medicava Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- T1 weakly broadened towards apex ( Fig. 19g ); T1 without a median trough ( Fig. 19g ); areolation on propodeum closed at anterior end ( Fig. 19f ) ...................................................... D. cucurbita Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

62. Pterostigma with a whitish basal spot ..................................................................... 63

- Pterostigma without whitish basal spot .................................................................... 67

63. T2 nearly smooth, at most weakly wrinkled ................................................................ 64

- T2 strongly rugose as T1 ............................................................................... 65

64. Pterostigma with darker border, fully brown ( Fig. 62g ); ovipositor sheath noticeably longer than hind tibia ( Fig. 62d ); scutellum smooth or sparsely punctate, brilliantly lustrous ( Fig. 62h ) .............................. ... D. ultima (Kotenko, 1986)

- Pterostigma without darker border ( Figs 42g , 70j ); ovipositor sheath slightly longer than hind tibia; scutellum weakly shiny and distinctly punctate at least towards sides ( Fig. 42d ) ........................................ D. metesae ( Nixon, 1967)

65. T1 with median fovea on apical half; head behind eyes strongly contracted.... D. molestae , comb. nov. ( Muesebeck, 1933)

- T1 without median fovea on apical half; head behind eyes a little contracted ...................................... 66

66. Lateral carinae of areolation strongly bifurcated into small areolae medially ( Fig. 18c ); scutellar sulcus with sparse carinae ( Fig. 18h ); inner spur of hind tibia less than half (2/5) length of hind basitarsus ................. D. crassa Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- Lateral carinae of areolation not bifurcated ( Fig. 15f ); scutellar sulcus with dense carinae ( Fig. 15b ); inner spur of hind tibia more than half (3/5) length of hind basitarsus .................................. D. carborugosa Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

67. Vein r of fore wing shorter than 2-SR; T1 polished .............................. .. D. gracilituba Song & Chen, 2004

- Vein r of fore wing longer, at least as long as 2-SR; T1 more or less rugose ....................................... 68

68. T2 rugose to rugulose ................................................................................. 69

- T2 smooth to almost smooth ............................................................................ 75

69. Punctures on disc of mesonotum sparse, interspaces much larger than diameter of punctures ( Fig. 58f ); ovipositor sheath nearly 1.3× longer than hind tibia, somewhat wider medially................................ D. spanis Chen & Song, 2004

- Punctures on disc of mesonotum much denser, interspaces about as long as or smaller than diameter of punctures (e.g. Fig. 53e ) ................................................................................................... 70

70. Ovipositor with a more or less distinct apical attenuation ..................................................... 71

- Ovipositor without apical attenuation ..................................................................... 73

71. Apical segment of fore tarsus with distinct spine; ovipositor thick, with a distinct apical attenuation .................... .............................................................................. D. lacteicolor ( Viereck, 1911)

- Apical segment of fore tarsus without distinct spine; ovipositor thinner, with a weakly differentiated or very short apical attenuation ............................................................................................... 72

72. T2 strongly, abruptly curved into T3 ( Fig. 53g ); lateral carinae of areolation strongly bifurcated medially ( Fig. 53f ); antenna yellowish brown .......................................................... D. punctipila Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

- T2 weakly, evenly curved in to T3 ( Fig. 5g ); lateral carinae of areolation not bifurcated medially ( Fig. 5f ); antenna dark brown ( Fig. 5h ).............................................................. .. D. anterocava Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

73. Areola U-shaped at bottom; temple shiny with superficial punctures; posterior tangent to anterior ocellus at most touching posterior pair of ocelli ................................................................................. 74

- Areola V-shaped at bottom ( Fig. 64h ); temple relatively dull, weakly rough with large, indistinct punctures ( Fig. 64d ); posterior tangent to anterior ocellus indistinctly transecting posterior pair of ocelli ................ D. victoria Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

74. Apical margin of T2 nearly straight; T1 without median fovea on apical half; ovipositor and ovipositor sheath about equal in length .............................................................. .. D. angularis Song, Chen & Yang, 2006

- Apical margin of T2 distinctly curved into T3 ( Fig. 20f ); T1 weakly concave and polished medio-apically ( Fig. 20f ); ovipositor at least 2.0× longer than ovipositor sheath ( Fig. 20a )........................... .. D. excellentis Liu & Chen , sp. nov.

75. Wing membrane fumous ( Fig. 2b ); ovipositor thick with apical attenuation ( Fig. 2f ).......... .. D. agilis ( Ashmead, 1905)

- Wing membrane hyaline ( Fig. 32b ); ovipositor without apical attenuation ..... D. kurosawai ( Watanabe, 1940) , comb. nov.

Figures

FIGURE 1. Dolichogenidea acron (Nixon, 1967), comb. nov., female. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. hind wing; d. antenna; e. head, dorsal view; f. propodeum; g. head, frontal view; h. mesosoma, dorsal view; i. metasoma. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 2. Dolichogenidea agilis (Ashmead, 1905), female. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. mesosoma, dorsal view; d. head, dorsal view; e. head, frontal view; f. ovipositor; g. propodeum and metasoma; h. hind wing. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 3. Dolichogenidea alophogaster Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. mesosoma, dorsal view; d. head, dorsal view; e. head, frontal view; f. hind wing; g. propodeum and metasoma. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 4. Dolichogenidea altithoracica Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. head, dorsal view; d. head, frontal view; e. hind wing; f. propodeum, dorsal view; g. mesosoma, dorsal view; h. metasoma; i. ovipositor. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 5. Dolichogenidea anterocava Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. hind wing; d. mesosoma, dorsal view; e. head, dorsal view; f. propodeum, dorsal view; g. metasoma, dorsal view; h. antenna; i. head, frontal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 6. Dolichogenidea apicurvus Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. head, dorsal view; d. mesosoma, dorsal view; e. propodeum, dorsal view; f. head, frontal view; g. hind wing; h. metasoma. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 7. Dolichogenidea asotae (Watanabe, 1932), female, China. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. head, dorsal view; d. propodeum and T1–T3, dorsal view; e. pronotum, dorsal view; f. hind wing; g. head, frontal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 8. Dolichogenidea atarsi Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. fore wing; c. propodeum, dorsal view; d. head, frontal view; e. metasoma, dorsal view; f. ovipositor; g. mesosoma, dorsal view; h. head, dorsal view; i. hind wing; j. antenna. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 9. Dolichogenidea bambusae (Wilkinson, 1928), comb. nov., female. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. hind wing; d. propodeum, dorsal view; e. antenna; f. mesosoma, dorsal view; g. head, frontal view; h. head, dorsal view; i. metasoma. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 10. Dolichogenidea baoris (Wilkinson, 1930), female, China. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. fore and hind wings; c. head, frontal view; d. mesosoma, dorsal view; e. head, dorsal view; f. propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 11. Dolichogenidea belippicola (Liu & You, 1988), female, China. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. head, frontal view; c. head, dorsal view; d. mesosoma, dorsal view; e. propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view; f. ovipositor; g. fore and hind wings. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 12. Dolichogenidea breviattenuata Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. hind wing; d. head, dorsal view; e. ovipositor sheath; f. mesosoma, dorsal view; g. propodeum; h. head, frontal view; i. metasoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 13. Dolichogenidea brevicarinata Chen & Song, 2004, female, China. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. mesosoma, dorsal view; d. hind wing; e. propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view; f. head, dorsal view; g. mesopleurum; h. head, frontal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 14. Dolichogenidea caniae (Wilkinson, 1928), female, China. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. wings; c. head, frontal view; d. mesopleurum; e. head, dorsal view; f. hind wing; g. propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view; h. mesosoma, dorsal view; i. ovipositor sheath. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 15. Dolichogenidea carborugosa Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. mesosoma, dorsal view; c. fore wing; d. head, dorsal view; e. hind wing; f. propodeum, dorsal view; g. head, frontal view; h. metasoma, dorsal view; i. ovipositor sheath. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 16. Dolichogenidea clausa Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. fore wing; c. metasoma, dorsal view; d. mesosoma, dorsal view; e. hind wing; f. head, frontal view; g. propodeum, dorsal view; h. head, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 17. Dolichogenidea conpuncta Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. hind wing; c. fore wing; d. propodeum, dorsal view; e. metasoma, dorsal view; f. head, dorsal view; g. head, frontal view; h. ovipositor; i. mesosoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 18. Dolichogenidea crassa Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. propodeum, dorsal view; d. head, dorsal view; e. head, frontal view; f. metasoma, dorsal view; g. hind wing; h. mesosoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 19. Dolichogenidea cucurbita Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. hind wing; d. head, dorsal view; e. mesosoma, dorsal view; f. propodeum; g. metasoma, dorsal view; h. ovipositor; i. head, frontal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 20. Dolichogenidea excellentis Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. propodeum, dorsal view; d. mesosoma, dorsal view; e. head, frontal view; f. metasoma, dorsal view; g. hind wing; h. head, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 21. Dolichogenidea expulsa (Turner, 1919), female, China. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. head, dorsal view; c. head, frontal view; d. metasoma, dorsal view; e. mesosoma, dorsal view; f. propodeum, dorsal view; g. hind wing. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 22. Dolichogenidea flexisulcus Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. hind wing; d. head, frontal view; e. propodeum, dorsal view; f. head, dorsal view; g. metasoma, dorsal view; h. mesosoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 23. Dolichogenidea flexitergita Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore and hind wings; c. head, dorsal view; d. mesosoma, dorsal view; e. propodeum; f. head, frontal view; g. hind wing; h. metasoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 24. Dolichogenidea fluctisulcus Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. propodeum, dorsal view; d. metasoma, dorsal view; e. hind wing; f. head, frontal view; g. ovipositor sheath; h. mesosoma, dorsal view; i. head, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 25. Dolichogenidea gleditsia Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. propodeum, dorsal view; d. head, dorsal view; e. hind wing; f. metasoma, dorsal view; g. mesosoma, dorsal view; h. head, frontal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 26. Dolichogenidea hemitheae (Wilkinson, 1928), female, China. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. hind wing; c. fore wing; d. head, frontal view; e. propodeum, dorsal view; f. mesosoma, dorsal view; g. head, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 27. Dolichogenidea hemituba Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. hind wing; d. propodeum, dorsal view; e. head, dorsal view; f. head, frontal view; g. mesosoma, dorsal view; h. metasoma, dorsal view; i. ovipositor sheath. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 29. Dolichogenidea hexagona Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. fore wing; c. hind wing; d. propodeum, dorsal view; e. head, dorsal view; f. mesosoma, dorsal view; g. ovipositor sheath; h. head, frontal view; i. metasoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 30. Dolichogenidea hyposidrae (Wilkinson, 1928), female, China. a. habitus, lateral view; b. mesosoma, dorsal view; c. head, dorsal view; d. head, frontal view; e. propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view; f. fore and hind wing. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 31. Dolichogenidea infirmus Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. mesosoma, dorsal view; d. hind wing; e. head, frontal view; f. propodeum, dorsal view; g. metasoma, dorsal view; h. head, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 32. Dolichogenidea kurosawai (Watanabe, 1940), comb. nov., female. a habitus, lateral view; b fore wing; c head, frontal view; d head, dorsal view; e metasoma, dorsal view; f hind wing; g propodeum, dorsal view; h mesosoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 34. Dolichogenidea latitergita Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. hind wing; d. head, dorsal view; e. antenna; f. mesosoma, dorsal view; g. propodeum, dorsal view; h. metasoma, dorsal view; i. head, frontal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 35. Dolichogenidea lincostulata Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. hind wing; c. propodeum, dorsal view; d. fore wing; e. metasoma, dorsal view; f. mesosoma, dorsal view; g. head, dorsal view; h. head, frontal view; i. ovipositor sheath. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 36. Dolichogenidea lissos (Nixon, 1967), comb. nov., female, China. a habitus, lateral view; b mesosoma, dorsal view; c head, dorsal view; d head, frontal view; e propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view; f wings. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 37. Dolichogenidea lobesia Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. mesosoma, dorsal view; c. wings; d. propodeum; e. ovipositor; f. metasoma, dorsal view; g. head, frontal view; h. head, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 38. Dolichogenidea longialba Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. mesosoma, dorsal view; c. fore wing; d. propodeum, dorsal view; e. antenna; f. hind wing; g. head, dorsal view; h. ovipositor; i. head, frontal view; j. metasoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 39. Dolichogenidea longimagna Liu & Chen, sp. nov. female, holotype. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. fore and hind wings; c. propodeum, dorsal view; d. head, dorsal view; e. ovipositor sheath; f. antenna; g. mesosoma, dorsal view; h. head, frontal view; i. metasoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 40. Dolichogenidea lunatus Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. antenna; c. propodeum, dorsal view; d. fore wing; e. head, dorsal view; f. hind wing; g. mesosoma, dorsal view; h. metasoma, dorsal view; i. head, frontal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 41. Dolichogenidea medicava Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. head, dorsal view; d. mesosoma, dorsal view; e. propodeum, dorsal view; f. head, frontal view; g. hind wing; h. metasoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 42. Dolichogenidea metesae (Nixon, 1967), female, China. a. habitus, lateral view; b. head, frontal view; c. propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view; d. mesosoma, dorsal view; e. head, dorsal view; f. hind wing; g. fore wing. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 43. Dolichogenidea minuscula Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. fore wing; c. ovipositor; d. propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view; e. hind wing; f. mesosoma, dorsal view; g. antenna; h. head, dorsal view; i. head, frontal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 44. Dolichogenidea multicolor Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. fore wing; c. hind wing; d. head, dorsal view; e. ovipositor; f. head, frontal view; g. propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view; h. antenna; i. mesosoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 45. Dolichogenidea numenes (Nixon, 1967), female, China. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. head, dorsal view; d. mesosoma, dorsal view; e. propodeum, dorsal view; f. head, frontal view; g. hind wing; h. metasoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 46. Dolichogenidea obsoleta Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. fore wing; c. hind wing; d. mesosoma, dorsal view; e. ovipositor sheath; f. metasoma, dorsal view; g. head, frontal view; h. head, dorsal view; i. propodeum, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 47. Dolichogenidea opacifinis Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. hind wing; d. propodeum, dorsal view; e. head, dorsal view; f. mesosoma, dorsal view; g. head, frontal view; h. metasoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 48. Dolichogenidea ovata Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. head, dorsal view; b. fore wing; c. habitus, lateral view; d. head, frontal view; e. propodeum, dorsal view; f. metasoma, dorsal view; g. hind wing; h. mesosoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 49. Dolichogenidea parallodorsum Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. ovipositor; c. head, frontal view; d. hind wing; e. head, dorsal view; f. metasoma, dorsal view; g. fore wing; h. mesosoma, dorsal view; i. propodeum, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 50. Dolichogenidea parasae (Rohwer, 1922), female, China. a. habitus, lateral view; b. mesopleurum; c. mesosoma, dorsal view; d. propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view; e. head, lateral view; f. hind wing; g. head, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 51. Dolichogenidea pentgona Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. propodeum, dorsal view; d. hind wing; e. mesosoma, dorsal view; f. head, frontal view; g. head, dorsal view; h. metasoma, dorsal view; i. ovipositor sheath. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 53. Dolichogenidea punctipila Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. hind wing; d. head, dorsal view; e. mesosoma, dorsal view; f. propodeum, dorsal view; g. metasoma, dorsal view; h. head, frontal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 54. Dolichogenidea rectivena Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. fore wing; c. head, dorsal view; d. hind wing; e. mesosoma, dorsal view; f. propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view; g. head, frontal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 55. Dolichogenidea scabipuncta Chen & Song, 2004, female, China. a. habitus, lateral view; b. wings; c. mesopleurun; d. mesosoma, dorsal view; e. propodeum, dorsal view; f. head, dorsal view; g. head, frontal view; h. metasoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 56. Dolichogenidea singularis Yang & You, 2002, female, China. a. habitus, lateral view; b. mesopleurun; c. head, frontal view; d. head, dorsal view; e. mesosoma, dorsal view; f. hind wing; g. propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 57. Dolichogenidea sonani (Watanabe, 1932), female, China. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. head, frontal view; d. mesosoma, dorsal view; e. head, dorsal view; f. propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view; g. hind wing; h. hind coxa; i. ovipositor sheath. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 58. Dolichogenidea spanis Chen & Song, 2004, female, China. a. habitus, lateral view; b. head, frontal view; c. propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view; d. head, dorsal view; e. hind wing; f. mesosoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 59. Dolichogenidea stantoni (Ashmead, 1904), female, China. a. head, dorsal view; b. wings; c. head, frontal view; d. propodeum, dorsal view; e. mesosoma, dorsal view; f. metasoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 60. Dolichogenidea taiwanensis (Sonan, 1942), female, China. a. habitus, lateral view; b. antenna; c. mesosoma, dorsal view; d. head, frontal view; e. head, dorsal view; f. fore wing; g. propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 61. Dolichogenidea transcarinata Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. fore wing; c hind wing; d. head, frontal view; e. propodeum, dorsal view; f. mesosoma, dorsal view; g. metasoma, dorsal view; h. head, dorsal view; i. ovipositor and legs; j. antenna. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 62. Dolichogenidea ultima (Kotenko, 1986), female. a. habitus, lateral view; b. head, dorsal view; c. hind wing; d. ovipositor sheath; e. head, frontal view; f. propodeum, dorsal view; g. fore wing; h. mesosoma, dorsal view; i. metasoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 63. Dolichogenidea vadosulcus Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. hind wing; d. head, frontal view; e. head, dorsal view; f. mesosoma, dorsal view; g. propodeum, dorsal view; h. ovipositor; i. metasoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 64. Dolichogenidea victoria Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, dorsal view; b. fore wing; c. mesosoma, dorsal view; d. head, dorsal view; e. head, frontal view; f. metasoma, dorsal view; g. hind wing; h. propodeum, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 65. Dolichogenidea wangi Liu & Chen, sp. nov., female, holotype. a. habitus, lateral view; b. fore wing; c. hind wing; d. head, frontal view; e. propodeum, dorsal view; f. metasoma, dorsal view; g. head, dorsal view; h. ovipositor; i. mesosoma, dorsal view. Scale line = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 70. Types of ultor-group of the genus Dolichogenidea from BMNH. a1–a2. D. acron (Nixon, 1967); b1–b2. D. bambusae (Wilkinson, 1928), comb. nov.; c1–c2. D. baoris (Wilkinson, 1930); d. D. caniae (Wilkinson, 1928); e. D. expulsa (Turner, 1919); f. D. hemitheae (Wilkinson, 1928); g1–g4. D. heterusiae (Wilkinson, 1928); h. D. hyposidrae (Wilkinson, 1928); i. D. lissos (Nixon, 1967), comb. nov.; j. D. metesae (Nixon, 1967) (spelled metisae in the type labels); k1–k2. D. numenes (Nixon, 1967); l. D. prisca (Nixon, 1967).