Aphaenogaster phillipsi Wheeler & Mann , 1916

Borowiec, Lech & Salata, Sebastian, 2014, Review of Mediterranean members of the Aphaenogaster cecconii group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with description of four new species, Zootaxa 3861 (1) : -

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3861.1.2
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:80EBD487-1BFD-4BE7-A451-16979CC1184C
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6140722
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AC886E-FFE6-FFDB-FF39-F3D04606BB79
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Aphaenogaster phillipsi Wheeler & Mann , 1916
status

Treatment

Aphaenogaster phillipsi Wheeler & Mann, 1916 View in CoL

Aphaenogaster (Deromyrma) phillipsi Wheeler & Mann, 1916: 168 View in CoL , fig. 1.

Type material. Syntype worker: PETRA | Palestine 1914 | W. M. Mann || Wm. M. Wheeler || M.C.Z | CoType | 1–3 | 20618 ( MCZ) (Image examined, http://insects.oeb.harvard.edu/mcz/Species_record.php?id=17989). The type locality Petra is now placed in Jordan.

Other material examined. One worker: ISRAEL | Arad | 21 IV 1981 | A. FREIDBERG || Aphaenogaster | philippsi Wheeler [sic! spelling error] | J. Kugler det. 1982 || BMNH (E) | 1017816 || ANTWEB | CASENT | 0 280962 || Aphaenogaster phillipsi ( NHML). The same specimen is imaged on AntWeb (http://www.antweb.org/ specimen/casent0280962; image by Michele Esposito; accessed 7 August 2014).

Redescription. Measurements: Worker (n = 1): HL: 1,630; HW: 0.995; TL: 0.8; GL: 0.525; CW: 0.190; FLW: 0.346: SL: 2.431; EL: 0.257; EW: 0.207; ML: 2.290; PSL: 0.234; SDL: 0.215; HTL: 2.250; PL: 0.654; PPL: 0.520; PH: 0.419; PPH: 0.369; PNW: 0.749; DPSB: 0.302; DPST: 0.285; PW: 0.268; PPW: 0.369; CI: 61; CL: 19.1; FLI: 54.9; SI1: 148.5; SI2: 243.3; PI1: 156.1; PI2: 65.7; PPI1: 140.9; PPI2: 37.1; SPI1: 23.5; SPI2: 108.8; HTI: 226.1; MI: 305.7; PSI: 122.2; TGI: 152.4.

Head and thorax yellow. Abdomen yellow, first tergite in posterior 2/3 length brown. Mandibles, antennae and legs yellow ( Figs. 11, 12 View FIGURES 11 – 12 ).

Head posterior to eyes with straight sides strongly narrowed posteriad, at base forming narrow neck margined by sharp, high collar, head width/neck width ratio 2.39, tempora length/genae length ratio 1.76 ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 21 – 26 ). Anterior margin of clypeus straight. Eyes small, 0.41 times as long as length of tempora. Scapes elongate and slim, 2.22 times as long as width of head, at base 0.67 times as wide as in apex, gradually widened, straight, only apex slightly bent down without preapical constriction ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 15 – 20 ). Surface of scape shiny, covered with very short and sparse adherent setae, only on apex of scape pubescence slightly raised from the ground.

Promesonotum 2.1 times as long as wide, pronotum regularly convex in profile. Propodeum elongate, 1.41 times as long as wide, propodeal spines short, spiniform, runs obliquely upwards ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 11 – 12 ). Petiole elongate with long peduncle, its anterior face deeply concave, node rounded. Posterior face straight in anterior 3/4 length then shallowly concave. Ventral margin of petiole without spine or distinct angulation ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 9 – 10 ). In dorsal view, petiole almost parallel sided before petiolar node, then globular. Postpetiole in profile regularly rounded. In dorsal view postpetiole 1.5 times as long as wide with regularly rounded sides ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 11 – 12 ).

Mandibles elongate, with outer edges staright, dorsal surface with distinct striation and six setose punctures, shiny, inner margin with 8 small teeth. Clypeus only on sides with 2–3 thin oblique rugae, central part without sculpture, shiny. Frontal carinae short, not extending to the line connecting anterior margin of eyes, subparallel, interantennal area deeply impressed, smooth and shiny, frontal triangle with few, short, thin longitudinal rugae but shiny between rugosities. Frons only in dorsal part with thin longitudinal rugae, central part microreticulate but shiny. Gena, central part of head, tempora and base of head with indistinct microreticulation, shiny. Entire pronotum with diffused microreticulation, shiny, with 10 long setae. Mesonotum on top and sides slightly microgranulate, sides with few thin, oblique rugae, propodeum with slightly granulate sculpture, below spiracles with two short, thin, longitudinal rugae, top in anterior part with fine transverse wrinkles but surface of both mesonotum and propodeum appears slightly shiny ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 11 – 12 ). Top of mesosoma and propodeum each with a pair of short setae, slightly shorter than propodeal spines. Petiole and postpetiole on almost entire surface microreticulate but without wrinkles, appearing shiny, covered with several sparse, long setae. Gaster shiny, without microreticulation, tergites with sparse, long, erect setae 1.5 times as long as propodeal spines.

Legs very long, hind femora 1.25 times as long as thorax, hind tibiae 0.8 times as long as hind femora, hind tarsi 1.1 times as long as hind femora. Surface of legs shiny, fore tibiae only on ventral surface covered with very short and adherent pubescence, femora and mid- and hind tibiae completely without pubescence ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 11 – 12 ).

Biological data. Nothing is known about the biology of this species.

Distribution. Jordan: Petra (type locality); Israel: Judean Hills, Judean Desert and northern Negev ( Bodenheimer 1937, Kugler 1988, Vonshak & Ionescu-Hirsch 2010). Also recorded from Egypt ( Kugler 1988, Mohamed et al. 2001) but according to Taylor (2010) the record was based on misidentification of Aphaenogaster splendida ( Roger, 1859) .

Discussion. Aphaenogaster phillipsi is easily distinguished from other species of the group by the pale, mostly yellow to partly rusty yellow body with only the first gastral tergite partly brown. Aphaenogaster equestris at first glance is the most similar species, especially because of its mostly rusty yellow coloration, but differs in the head being elongately oval, without a basal constriction and a flared collar, and the frons has a triangular brown spot with diffused borders. Aphaenogaster equestris is more distinctly microsculptured, with parts of the thorax and head more or less opaque, while A. phillipsi at first glance appears completely shiny.