Ommatoiulus porathi ( Verhoeff, 1893 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2017.295 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5862FED7-135E-4648-93D4-46EEC294997A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6044714 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ACAF0E-EE7D-FFBE-1F38-7B09FB3BFCA8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ommatoiulus porathi ( Verhoeff, 1893 ) |
status |
|
Ommatoiulus porathi ( Verhoeff, 1893) View in CoL
Fig. 18 View Fig. 18
Julus porathi Verhoeff, 1893b: 166 View in CoL –167.
Palaioiulus porati [sic!] – Verhoeff 1894: 159, figs 10–11.
Schizophyllum porati View in CoL [sic!] – Verhoeff 1921: 53.
Diagnosis
Small species, most similar to O. sabulosus (Linnaeus, 1758) both having a promerite with no incision and gently narrowing distally, a simple and slender mesomerite, a solenomerite bearing a long mesal projection lodging the opening of the seminal groove and a distal lamella, and a simple and stout paracoxite. Different in the shape of the distal lamella of the solenomerite and also in the shape of the mesomerite and paracoxite.
Material examined
Holotype
PORTUGAL: Julus porathi Verhoeff, 1893 , micro-slide (ZMB); 1 ♂, Viseu Province, Serra do Caramulo, 40.593006 N, 8.163114 W, 6 Mar. 2012, N. Percino, M.G. París leg. (NHMW 8736).
Distribution
Central Portugal: Coimbra (Verheoff 1921), Viseu.
Comments
Ommatoiulus porathi was described verbally by Verhoeff (1893b), based on two males and six females. One year later, Verhoeff (1894) provided drawings of the mesomerite and opisthomerite, and in 1921 he included O. porathi in the identification key for the subgenus Bothroiulus ( Verhoeff, 1921) . The species has, however, never been collected again until now and has been regarded as dubious. The newly collected specimen agrees entirely with Verhoeff’s description, and its gonopods agree perfectly with those of the type specimen ( Fig. 18 View Fig. 18 ). O. porathi is, together with O. stellaris sp. nov. (see description below), one of the smallest known Ommatoiulus species. Verhoeff (1893b) didn’t give any measurements but merely stated that it is a little bit smaller than Leptoiulus trilineatus (C.L. Koch, 1847) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ommatoiulus porathi ( Verhoeff, 1893 )
Nesrine Akkari & Henrik Enghoff 2017 |
Julus porathi
Verhoeff 1893: 166 |