Coscinodiscus variabilis Frenguelli

Lameiro, Rubén A., Cefarelli, Adrián O. & Vouilloud, Amelia A., 2023, Taxonomic revision of Coscinodiscus variabilis (Bacillariophyta): analysis of type material, lectotypification and transfer to the genus Actinocyclus, Phytotaxa 626 (4), pp. 269-278 : 270-272

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.626.4.4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10249207

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ACBD51-FFA5-FFD5-FF72-CE7FFC235184

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Coscinodiscus variabilis Frenguelli
status

 

Coscinodiscus variabilis Frenguelli Figs 3–30 View FIGURES 3–23 View FIGURES 24–30

Original description (in Spanish): “ Valva pequeña, de 0,039 –0,057 mm de diámetro; superficie llana hasta cerca del borde convexo. Estrías: en el centro 8 y en el borde 12 en 0,01 mm; formadas de perlas bien distintas y robustas; reunidas en 6-7 fascículos radiantes separados, cerca del borde valvar, por un apículo bien evidente, interfascicular. En los ejemplares menores, cada serie fasciculada está separada de la contigua por una hilera de perlas que llega hasta cerca del centro, donde se encuentra un pequeño espacio hialino de forma irregular. En los ejemplares mayores este espacio central es más grande y se prolonga en forma de estrella con rayos más o menos largos en relación con el diámetro de la valva, substituyendo, en parte o totalmente (hasta el apículo correspondiente), la hilera de perlas interfascicular. Por esta disposición, mientras los ejemplares más pequeños tienen aspecto actinocicloide*, los más grandes, con espacios hialinos interfasciculares prolongados hasta cerca del borde y bien definidos, asumen estructura cosmiodiscoide, tanto más que, el espacio hialino central, con el progresivo desarrollo de los rayos interfasciculares es invadido por perlas irregularmente distríbuidas.”

Original description: (our translation) “ valve small, about 39–57 µm of diameter; flat surface until near the convex margin. Striae: 8 in the center and 12 in the edge in 10 µm; formed by very distinct and robust pearls; reunited in 6–7 radiate fascicles separated, near the valve margin, by an evident interfascicular apiculus; in the small specimens, each fasciculated series is separated from the contiguous by a row of pearls that almost reaches the center, where a small irregular hyaline space is observed. In the larger specimens, this central space is bigger and prolongs in the shape of a star with rays more or less long in relation to the valve diameter, substituting, partially or completely (up to the correspondent apiculus) the row of interfascicular pearls. By this disposition, while the smaller specimens have an actinocycloid aspect, the larger ones, with well-defined interfascicular hyaline spaces that extend near the valvar edge, assume a cosmiodiscoid structure, so much more that, the central hyaline space is invaded by irregularly distributed pearls due to the progressive development of the interfascicular rays’’ ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–2 ).

Expanded description (n= 24): Valves circular with a flat valve face or with a slightly depressed valve center, gently curving into the mantle; valve diameter 29–59µm. Radial areolation with areolae arranged in fascicles, 6–10 areolae in 10µm. Central area hyaline and small, variable in shape, clearly defined or irregular with sparse areolae. Fascicles limited by 6–14 hyaline rays of variable development, with large radial areolae rows parallel to central row, 8–10 striae in 10µm at the center of the valve and 10–12 in 10µm at valve margins. Hyaline rays either conspicuous or not clearly defined, variable in number, length and thickness, connected with valve center or margins, or between them. One marginal pseudonodulus ( Figs 6, 8, 17, 22 View FIGURES 3–23 , 25 View FIGURES 24–30 ) not always clearly defined, located at junction between valve face and mantle and a marginal ring of rimoportulae distinctively separated from each other, 4.8–8.2 RP in 100µm, aligned with hyaline rays ( Figs 7, 20 View FIGURES 3–23 , 24, 27 View FIGURES 24–30 ). Mantle with 15–17 striae in 10µm, areolae smaller and reduced to half of valvar areolae size.

There was high morphological variability among the specimens of the type population that allowed the recognition of specimens without well-defined hyaline rays whose fascicles are delimited by conspicuous rows of areolae ( Figs 16–17, 22–25 View FIGURES 3–23 View FIGURES 24–30 ) and specimens with clearly defined nearly or complete hyaline rays that may connect with, or be near, the valve margins exhibiting a star-shaped valve face ornamentation with an irregular central area (3–6, 12–15, 29). Intermediate forms were also noted with variable length and degree of development of the hyaline rays recognizing specimens with hyaline rays that may be inserted from an irregular central area and do not reach the valve margins ( Figs 11, 18–21 View FIGURES 3–23 , 30 View FIGURES 24–30 ), and specimens with hyaline rays located in the middle of the valve face that may reach the valve margins but never connect with the central area ( Figs 7–10 View FIGURES 3–23 , 27–28 View FIGURES 24–30 ). The thickness of this structure is another variable character. In some specimens they have a clock-hand shape becoming thinner towards the margins ( Figs 12–13 View FIGURES 3–23 ), some specimens have thickened rays that finish abruptly ( Figs 11 View FIGURES 3–23 , 30 View FIGURES 24–30 ) or have rounded ends ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 3–23 , 28 View FIGURES 24–30 ). Some of the thicker rays are interrupted by areolae or may include them in their structure ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 24–30 ). All these differences regarding the length and thickness of the hyaline rays even vary within a same specimen.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF