Endonura transcaucasica ( Stach, 1951 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4173.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EFD18D41-F846-495C-9831-60C1423A4B2C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6085019 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AD0F04-FFCD-F230-F6DF-8775FBDFB4A6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Endonura transcaucasica ( Stach, 1951 ) |
status |
|
Endonura transcaucasica ( Stach, 1951)
Figs 1–7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 , Tab. 1 View TABLE 1
Biloba transcaucasica: Stach 1951: 34 .
Type material. Lectotype by present designation: adult female on slide, Georgia, Caucasus , Tbilisi, 21.IV.1918, leg. Roszkowski, coll. J. Stach ( ISEA).
Diagnosis. Habitus typical of the genus Endonura . Dorsal tubercles present and well developed. 2+2 pigmented eyes. Buccal cone short, labrum nonogival. Head with chaetae A, B, D, E, F and G. Chaetae O and C absent. Tubercles Cl and Af separate. Chaetae D free. Tubercles Dl and (L+So) on head with 6 and 7 chaetae respectively. Tubercles Di and De on th. I present and separate. Tubercles De on th. II and III with 3 and 4 chaetae respectively. Tubercles L on abd. III and IV with 3 and 6 chaetae respectively. Abd. IV and V with 8 and 3 tubercles respectively. Claw without inner tooth. Tibiotarsi with chaetae B4 and B5 short.
Redescription. Habitus typical of the genus. Body length of lectotype (without antennae): 1.65 mm. Colour of the body white. 2+2 large pigmented eyes ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ).
Types of dorsal ordinary chaetae. Macrochaetae Ml relatively long, strongly thickened, almost cylindrical, arclike or straight, narrowly sheathed, densely serrated, apically rounded ( Figs 1, 5–7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ); macrochaetae Mc and Mcc thickened, straight and rounded at apex or pointed; mesochaetae and microchaetae short, thin, feebly serrated and pointed.
Head. Buccal cone short. Labrum nonogival, with ventral sclerifications as in Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 7 . Labrum chaetotaxy 2/2, 4. Labium with four basal, three distal and four lateral chaetae, papillae x absent. Maxilla and mandible as in Figs 3, 4 View FIGURES 1 – 7 . Antennal segments I and II with 7 and 11 chaetae respectively. Chaetotaxy of antennal segments III and IV impossible to recognize. Apical vesicle poorly visible, trilobed. Chaetotaxy of head as in Tab. 1 View TABLE 1 a, b, and Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 . Head with chaetae A, B, D, E, F and G. Chaetae O and C absent. Tubercles Cl and Af separate. Chaeta D free. Tubercle Dl with 6 chaetae, chaeta Dl3 present. Tubercle (L+So) with 7 chaetae, chaetae So2, So5 and L3 absent ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Elementary tubercles BE and CD present. Chaeta E connected with tubercle Af. Chaeta A shorter than B. Tubercle Oc with two chaetae, chaeta Oca absent ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Chaetae Ocp longer than A. Chaeta De2 as mesochaeta.
Thorax, abdomen, legs. Body s–chaeta thin and smooth, distinctly shorter than nearby macrochaetae ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Chaetotaxy of th. and abd. as in Tab. 1 View TABLE 1 d and in Figs 1, 5–7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 . Tubercles Di on th.I well differentiated and not fused with De. Tubercles De on th. II and III with 3 and 4 chaetae respectively. Chaetae De2 on th. II–III and De3 on th. III connected with tubercle De. Chaetae De3 on abd. I–III connected with tubercle De ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Chaetae De3 on Th. III and abd. I-III slightly longer than De2. The line of chaetae De1–chaeta s perpendicular to the dorsomedian line on abd. I–III ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Furca rudiment without microchaetae. Abd. IV and V with 8 and 3 tubercles respectively, tubercles Di on abd. V fused ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Tubercle L on abd. IV with 6 chaetae ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Chaetae L' and Vl on abd. V present. No cryptopygy. Chaetotaxy of legs as in Tab. 1 View TABLE 1 d.. Claw without inner tooth. Tibiotarsi with chaetae B4 and B5 short.
a) Cephalic chaetotaxy––dorsal side.
b) Cephalic chaetotaxy––ventral side.
c) Postcephalic chaetotaxy.
Terga Legs
Di De Dl L Scx2 Cx Tr Fe T th. I 1 2 1 - 0 3 6 1 2 1 9 th. II 3 2+s 3+s+ms 3 2 7 6 11 19 th. III 3 3+s 3+s 3 2 8 6 1 0 1 8
Sterna
abd. I 2 3+s 2 3 VT: 4
abd. II 2 3+s 2 3 Ve: 5 Ve1 - present
abd. III 2 3+ s 2 3 Vel :4 Fu: 5–6 me 0 mi abd . IV 2 2+ s 3 6 Vel : 3 Vec : 2 Vei : 2 Vl : 4 abd. V (3+3) 5+s Ag: 3 Vl: 1 L': 1 abd . VI 7 Ve :13-14 An : 2mi Discussion. Because of the absence of chaetae C and O on head, feature generally very rarely observed within Endonura , E. transcaucasica resembles E. baculifer Deharveng, 1979 described from Portugal. However , both species differ in a few characters, important from Neanurinae taxonomy point of view: presence/absence of chaetae E on head (in transcaucasica present, in baculifer absent) number of chaetae Dl on head (in transcaucasica 6, in baculifer 5) and number of chaetae (L+So) on head (in transcaucasica 8, in baculifer 7–9). In addition, the scientific name of Portugal species was derived from an unusual shape of its macrochaetae Di 1 of abdomen V which are extremely thickened and blunt at apex ( Deharveng 1979: Figs 9 View FIGURES 8 – 12 B, C).
Tubercle | Number of chaetae | Types of chaetae | Names of chaetae |
---|---|---|---|
Cl | 4 | Ml Mc | F G |
Af | 8 | Ml Mc me | A, B E D |
Oc | 2 | Ml | Ocm, Ocp |
Di | 2 | Ml Mc | Di1 Di2 |
De | 2 | Ml me | De1 De2 |
Dl | 6 | Ml Mc Mcc mi | Dl1, Dl5 Dl4, Dl3 Dl2 Dl6 |
(L+So) | 7 | Ml Mcc me | L1, L4, So1 L2 So3–4, So6 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Endonura transcaucasica ( Stach, 1951 )
Smolis, Adrian 2016 |
Biloba transcaucasica:
Stach 1951: 34 |