Oxyartes cresphontes (Westwood, 1859)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5419.3.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C0AE7092-4387-41B9-BE6D-9C1FF19E5DCD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10791846 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AD5A22-E34E-5212-FF47-FC6ACD54F86F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Oxyartes cresphontes (Westwood, 1859) |
status |
|
Oxyartes cresphontes (Westwood, 1859) View in CoL
( Figs. 3–4 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 )
Anophelepis cresphontes Westwood, 1859: 68 , pl. 3 [regarded as O. despecta ].
Oxyartes cresphontes Redtenbacher, 1908: 475 View in CoL [as a valid species]; Otte & Brock, 2005: 242 [Catalogue]; Mandal & Yadav, 2010: 12 [male]; Brock et al., 2016: 166 View Cited Treatment [type data]; Singh et al., 2021: 229 [Checklist]; Brock & Büscher, 2022: 540 [Catalogue].
Diagnosis. Westwood (1859) first described O. cresphontes as a variety of small O. despectus ( Westwood, 1848) and stated that the major differences are tubercles, spines and the scale-like wings pale yellow with a black margin on each side. Fortunately, this color pattern on the wings of O. cresphontes was shown in a drwing (Westwood 1859). In all the pictures of O. despectus (including two subspecies), it will be seen that O. despectus does not have such a wing coloration pattern. This is especially clear in the colorful plates by Westwood (1848) and photos on Phasmida Species File (PSF) ( Brock et al. 2023). Combining previous descriptions of spines or tubercles on the mesonotum of O. cresphontes , there are 2 tubercles on the anterior and posterior of mesonotum, but such a feature can also be found in O. despectus ( Brock et al. 2023, Mandal & Yadav 2010, Redtenbacher 1908, Westwood 1848, 1859). Our specimen has only one pair of strong spines near the anterior margin, and posterior of mesonotum with a pair of indistinct and tiny tubercles, This is different from what is known in both species ( Fig3 A–C, G View FIGURE 3 ).
By checking the photos of the holotype of O. despectus despectus ( Westwood, 1848) on the PSF ( Brock et al. 2023), and plates drawn by Retdenbacher (1908), our specimen can be separated by the fifth abdominal tergite of O. despectus despectus with a relatively large hump as well. Both O. cresphontes and O. despectus despectus are distributed over a wide area in the southern foothills of the Himalayas ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ), but O. cresphontes is closer to Mêdog County (specimen locality). Combining geographic distribution, wing color patterns (Fig, 3A, C), we hereby consider the specimen we found to be O. cresphontes .
Materials. 1♀, China, XizangAutonomous Region , Nyingchi City , Mêdog County, Mêdog Town, 29°19′36.79″N, 95°19′16.99″E, 1008m, 6-VII-2023, leg. Zhi-Sheng Zhang, Lu-Yu Wang, Qian-Le Lu & Xu-Long Chen ( YNAU) GoogleMaps .
Remarks. First record this species from China.
Distribution. China (Xizang: Mêdog); India (Assam, Meghalaya, Sikkim).
Suggested common name (Chinese). 克氏ṉ异DZ.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Oxyartes cresphontes (Westwood, 1859)
Gao, Hao-Ran, Wang, Chen & Zhang, Hong-Rui 2024 |
Oxyartes cresphontes
Brock, P. D. & Buscher, T. 2022: 540 |
Singh, L. R. K. & Chandra, K. & Gupta, D. 2021: 229 |
Brock, P. D. & Marshall, J. A. & Beccaloni, G. W. & Harman, A. J. E. 2016: 166 |
Mandal, S. K. & Yadav, K. 2010: 12 |
Otte, D. & Brock, P. D. 2005: 242 |
Redtenbacher, J. 1908: 475 |