Spaniopus dissimilis Walker, 1833
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4058.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B316C84C-7415-449F-9ABF-5DD600556844 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6113678 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AD5B42-FFB3-FFCC-6893-FE3BFD37EFBF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Spaniopus dissimilis Walker, 1833 |
status |
|
Spaniopus dissimilis Walker, 1833 View in CoL
( Figs 13–18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 , 40–42 View FIGURES 40 – 45 )
Spaniopus dissimilis Walker, 1833: 466 View in CoL ; lectotype ♂ (BMNH, examined). Type locality: [ Great Britain] "near London". Spaniopus elegans Foerster, 1856: 56 View in CoL ; holotype ♂, perhaps lost ( Bouček 1972: 312). Type locality: [ Germany]. Polyscelis modestus Gahan, 1922: 11 ; holotype ♀ (USNM, not examined). Type locality: [ USA] "Pennsylvania, Hanover".
Synonymy by Graham (1969: 705).
Description. Female. Body length 1.9–2.4 mm; fore wing length 1.4–2.0 mm. Colour: head, mesosoma and metasoma dark metallic green with diffuse coppery lustre; antenna with scape yellowish-brown, pedicel and flagellum brown or sometimes hardly paler basally; legs yellowish-brown; fore with or without infuscate spot under M and S; ovipositor sheath dark brown.
Head in dorsal view 2.0× as broad as long and 1.15–1.20× as broad as mesoscutum; in frontal view 1.2–1.3× broader than high. POL 1.0–1.1× OOL. Eye height 1.40–1.45× eye length and 1.2–1.3× as long as malar space. Frons 1.4–1.5× broader than eye height. Distance between antennal toruli and lower margin of clypeus 0.8–0.9× distance between antennal toruli and median ocellus. Clypeus radially striate, its lower margin weakly emarginate. Mandible formula 3:4. Antenna with scape 0.9–1.0× as long as eye height and 1.3× as long as eye length; pedicel 1.7× as long as broad and 1.3× as long as F1; combined length of pedicel and flagellum 0.9× breadth of head; second anellus distinctly transverse, about 2.0× as long as first anellus; F1 1.3–1.4× as long as broad, hardly constricted basally; F2 and F3 longer than broad, F4 and F6 subquadrate; each funicular segment with one row of dense sensilla; clava 1.9–2.0× as long as broad.
Mesosoma 1.5–1.6× as long as broad. Pronotal collar medially 0.2× as long as mesoscutum. Scutellum finely reticulate, about as long as broad, with noticeable but shallow frenal line. Propodeum medially 0.65–0.70× as long as scutellum; usually with median carina complete, costula rarely complete; nucha subglobose and strongly reticulate, occupying 0.5× length of propodeum. Fore wing 2.3× as long as maximum width; basal cell bare; speculum open; M 1.35–1.56× as long as P and 1.66–1.8× as long as S; P 1.3–1.4× as long as S.
Metasoma ovate-acuminate, 1.36–1.53× as long as broad and 1.2–1.37× as long as mesosoma. Ovipositor sheath projecting slightly beyond apex of metasoma.
Male. Body length 1.4–1.5 mm. Colour: antenna with pedicel, F1–F6 and clava yellowish-brown; fore wing hyaline; mid tibia brown. POL 1.45–1.5× OOL. Antenna with pedicel 0.9–1.1× as long as F1; F1–F6 longer than broad; combined length of pedicel and flagellum 1.3× breadth of head; clava 2.6–2.8× as long as broad. Mesosoma 1.8× as long as broad. Fore wing with M 1.0–1.1× as long as P. Inner margin of mid tibia more broadly flattened than its outer margin. Metasoma 0.7–0.8× as long as mesosoma. Otherwise similar to female.
Material examined. GREAT BRITAIN: 1 ♂ (lectotype), “ LECTOTYPE ”, “grass in fields near London August”, “ Spaniopus dissimile Walker ”, “Stood under this name in old B. M. Coll C. Waterhouse”, “ Spaniopus dissimilis (Walk.) ♂ det. M.W.R. de V. Graham, 1956 ”, “B.M. TYPE HYM. 5 1810”, “ BMNH (E) #953702”; 1 ♀, “Ross-shire, Black Isle vii.1951 N.W. Hussey”,“Ex Megastigmus infested seed.”,“Pres by Com Inst Ent B M 1953- 623”,“ Trichomalus near sunides MWG. 1952”, “ BMNH (E) #953704”. SWEDEN: 2 ♀, 2 ♂, “ SWEDEN. SK. Fjellfota sjö. 31.vii.1938 J.F.P. B.M. 1938-414” (all from BMNH). RUSSIA: 1 ♀, “Primorskiy Territory, Spassk- Dal’niy, 30 km W, 3–4.VII.1984, Belokobylskij”; 1 ♀, “Primorskiy Territory, Natural Reserve “Kedrovaya pad’”, 18.VIII.1976, Storozheva” (both from ZISP).
Distribution. Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Great Britain, Netherland, Russia, Slovakia, Sweden, United States of America ( Noyes 2015).
Biology. Primary parasitoid of Mayetiola destructor (Say, 1817) ( Diptera , Cecidomyiidae ) ( Thompson 1958; Peck 1963; Graham 1969; Bouček 1972; Dzhanokmen 1978; Herting 1978; Burks 1979; Noyes 2015); Diplolepis rosae (Linnaeus, 1758) ( Herting 1977; Jennings 2004; Askew et al. 2006; Lotfalizadeh 2007; Noyes 2015) and Phanacis caulicola (Hedicke, 1939) ( Askew et al. 2006; Noyes 2015) ( Hymenoptera : Cynipidae ); lepidopteran pupa of Coleophora sp. ( Coleophoridae ) ( Askew 1970; Noyes 2015) and Elachista poae Stainton, 1855 (Elachistidae) (Vidal 1993; Noyes 2015). Secondary parasitoid of hymenopteran Apanteles sp. ( Braconidae ), Platygaster vernalis (Myers, 1917) and P. zosine Walker, 1835 (Platygastridae) ( Peck 1963; Noyes 2015).
The records as egg parasitoids of Erigone atra and E. dentipalpis ( Araneae : Liniphyidae) ( Vidal 1997; Noyes 2015) should be verified very carefully.
Comparative diagnosis. Spaniopus dissimilis is very similar to S. amoenus , the differences between these species being given in the respective keys to the sexes.
ZISP |
Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Spaniopus dissimilis Walker, 1833
Tselikh, Ekaterina 2015 |
Spaniopus dissimilis
Boucek 1972: 312 |
Gahan 1922: 11 |
Foerster 1856: 56 |
Walker 1833: 466 |