Bemella jacutica
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.00289.2016 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AD87A8-FF82-6D3C-FFF3-FAF3676086C0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Bemella jacutica |
status |
|
Bemella jacutica View in CoL ? (Missarzhevsky in Rozanov and Missarzhevsky, 1966)
Fig. 10 View Fig .
Material.—Ten phosphatic internal moulds, including figured SMNH Mo181955–181958, from samples 1/50 and 1/6 section 1, Fig. 4 View Fig ), 3/12, 3/12.2, and K2/25 (section 3, Fig. 3), Kugda-Yuryakh (1/6) and Medvezhya formations, western Anabar Uplift, Siberian Platform, Russia. Correlated with the upper Fortunian and lower part of Cambrian Stage 2.
Description.—Bilaterally symmetrical, low cyrtoconic coiled less than 1/2 revolution), rapidly expanding shells.
Aperture broad oval in outline, with length/width ratio ca. 1.5 and with laterally straight margins. Apical part declined and projects beyond the apertural margin, apparent protoconch rounded and blunt, hemispherical, separated by a shallow constriction on internal mould. Subapical side short and concave, dorsum long and evenly convex. The inner surface of the shell (as replicated by internal moulds) smooth and carries widely spaced irregularly distributed low comarginal folds that cross the dorsum.
Remarks.— Bemella Missarzhevsky in Rozanov et al., 1969 was described from relatively large mechanically extracted
Fig. 11. Mollusc Helcionellida indet., internal moulds, from early Cambrian Emyaksin (A, D–J) and basal Kugda-Yuryakh (B, C) formations, Anabar → Uplift, Siberia, Russia; samples 5a/34.5 (A), 5/10 (D–F, I, J), and 5/10B (G, H), sections 96-5 and 96-5a; K2/60 (B), section 3; and K1a/67 (C), section 2. A–G, I, J. SMNH Mo181959–181965 (A–G, respectively), SMNH Mo 181966 (I), and SMNH Mo 181967 (J). H. SMNH 167610. A 1, B 4, C 2, E 2, F 3, upper; A 2, B 3, D 1, E 3, F 2, I 1, H, subapical; B 1, C 1, D 2, E 1, F 1, G, I 2, J 3, lateral; I 3, J 2, apertural views; B 2, apical area with polygons enlarged. Scale bar 125 μm (B 2), 500 μm (A, B 1, B 3, B 4, C, D 1, I, J) and 1 mm (D 2, E–G, H).
internal moulds from the Medvezhya Formation on the northwest flank of the Anabar Uplift. Bemella jacutica ? described herein has diagnostic features of the genus, but has a subdued ornamentation and probably represent small specimens of the type species B. jacutica from the same area and level. Parkhaev (in Gravestock et al. 2001) and Parkhaev and Demidenko (2010) have revised Bemella . The genus is generally similar to Igorella Missarzhevsky in Rozanov et al., 1969, which was also first described from the Medvezhya Formation from mechanically prepared, mm-sized internal moulds. According to Parkhaev and Demidenko (2010) and Missarzhevsky (1989), Bemella is distinguished by having a relatively lower shell than Igorella . Bemella jacutica ? is different from Bemella simplex Yu, 1979 , from South China described by Parkhaev and Demidenko (2010) in having a higher shell with a more elongate, hooked apical part. Helcionellida indet. are different from Bemella jacutica ? in wider shells (Fig. 11A–C) or in a more pointed hooked initial part (Fig. 11D–J).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.