Lopochites sp.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.00289.2016 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AD87A8-FFD8-6D64-FFF3-FB52633885B6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Lopochites sp. |
status |
|
Fig. 45C–K View Fig .
Material.—Over 30 internal moulds with fragments of phosphatized walls, including SMNH X5803–5811, from samples 1/46, 1/45, 1/39.3 (section 1, Fig. 4 View Fig ), K2/12, K2/20, K2/21, K2/24, 3/10, 3/12.2 (section 3, Fig. 3), 4/27.5, 5/10, 5/10B, 5a/1.2 (sections 96-4, 96-5, 96-5a), Medvezhya and lower Emyaksin formations, Anabar Uplift, Siberia, Russia; upper Fortunian Stage.
Description.—Elongate, narrow, helically twisted (up to 90º) and gently longitudinally bent sclerites. Cross-section narrow oval at the base and broader, irregular oval distally. Foramen narrow, oval, and slightly bent, separated from the rest of sclerite by a shallow circumferential depression. Surface of sclerite covered with longitudinal striae; fine transverse striae at the base. Wall composed of longitudinally oriented fibres ( Fig. 45D View Fig ).
Remarks.— Lopochites spp. occur in the Terreneuvian Series of South China, western Mongolia, and Iran ( Esakova and Zhegallo 1996; Steiner et al. 2004a). Specimens of Lopochites spp. described from South China (Qian and Bengtson 1989) are phosphatized sclerites, in contrast with our material which is comprised of phosphatic internal moulds. Occasionally, preserved walls of the Siberian sclerites suggest that the outer surface was smooth and lacked the prominent longitudinal ridges present in species from South China and western Mongolia. The outer wall is however not completely preserved and may show a smooth inner surface just above the internal moulds ( Fig. 45D View Fig ). The sclerites are similar to Lopochites in being helically twisted longitudinally and in having a narrow irregularly oval foramen, a rounded cross-section of the distal part (e.g., Qian and Bengtson 1989: fig. 13E 6, E 7) and similar microstructure of the wall (Qian and Bengtson 1989: fig. 14). Lopochites sp. is generally more similar to L. curtus Grigorieva (in Voronin et al. 1982), whereas L. latazonalis is broader and shorter.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.