Andrena (Melanapis) fuscosa Erichson, 1835
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.916.2381 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0DC587F6-9DAA-4F6E-BA2A-AD528990BA24 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10453482 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ADDB11-FF81-FFBC-0A50-FAC3FB69F9AD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Andrena (Melanapis) fuscosa Erichson, 1835 |
status |
|
Andrena (Melanapis) fuscosa Erichson, 1835 View in CoL
Andrena (Melanapis) fuscosa Erichson, 1835: 103 View in CoL , ♂ ( Spain: ZMHB).
Andrena (Melanapis) rutila Spinola, 1838: 510 View in CoL , ♀ ( Egypt: MRSN, lectotype by present designation; Fig. 6A–D View Fig ).
Andrena (Melanapis) ephippium Spinola, 1838: 511 View in CoL , ♀ ( Egypt: MRSN, lectotype by present designation; Fig. 7A–D View Fig ).
Remarks
Wood (2023) presented genetic data for A. fuscosa from Spain, the locus typicus. Whilst this showed that material from Spain was closely related to sequences from Israel and northern India, specimens from Morocco were separated by around 5%. Further study is required to establish whether or not North African material represents a distinct species or simply genetic drift and separation by distance. No morphological differences are immediately apparent. In any case, recognising the next available names is important, these being Spinola’s names from Egypt ( Spinola 1838). For both taxa, a single female specimen is conserved in the MRSN collection. Both conform to the concept of A. fuscosa , though A. rutila is extensively red-marked ( Fig. 6A–D View Fig ), and A. ephippium is predominantly dark ( Fig. 7A–D View Fig ); this colour variation can be found across the range of A. fuscosa without clear geographic gradients or patterns other than that red colouration is both more frequent and covers a greater proportion of the body in hotter and drier environments. The A. ephippium specimen is damaged and is missing its head, but structurally can clearly be identified as A. fuscosa . The two specimens may automatically be holotypes, but since this is not clear from Spinola’s original descriptions, they are here designated as lectotypes.
Distribution
Palaearctic, from the Canary Islands to Central Asia and northern India ( Gusenleitner & Schwarz 2002).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Taeniandrena |
Andrena (Melanapis) fuscosa Erichson, 1835
Wood, Thomas James 2023 |
Andrena (Melanapis) rutila
Spinola M. 1838: 510 |
Andrena (Melanapis) ephippium
Spinola M. 1838: 511 |