Andrena (Melanapis) fuscosa Erichson, 1835

Wood, Thomas James, 2023, Revisions to the Andrena fauna of north-western Africa with a focus on Morocco (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae), European Journal of Taxonomy 916 (1), pp. 1-85 : 10-11

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.916.2381

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0DC587F6-9DAA-4F6E-BA2A-AD528990BA24

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10453482

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ADDB11-FF81-FFBC-0A50-FAC3FB69F9AD

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Andrena (Melanapis) fuscosa Erichson, 1835
status

 

Andrena (Melanapis) fuscosa Erichson, 1835 View in CoL

Figs 6–7 View Fig View Fig

Andrena (Melanapis) fuscosa Erichson, 1835: 103 View in CoL , ♂ ( Spain: ZMHB).

Andrena (Melanapis) rutila Spinola, 1838: 510 View in CoL , ♀ ( Egypt: MRSN, lectotype by present designation; Fig. 6A–D View Fig ).

Andrena (Melanapis) ephippium Spinola, 1838: 511 View in CoL , ♀ ( Egypt: MRSN, lectotype by present designation; Fig. 7A–D View Fig ).

Remarks

Wood (2023) presented genetic data for A. fuscosa from Spain, the locus typicus. Whilst this showed that material from Spain was closely related to sequences from Israel and northern India, specimens from Morocco were separated by around 5%. Further study is required to establish whether or not North African material represents a distinct species or simply genetic drift and separation by distance. No morphological differences are immediately apparent. In any case, recognising the next available names is important, these being Spinola’s names from Egypt ( Spinola 1838). For both taxa, a single female specimen is conserved in the MRSN collection. Both conform to the concept of A. fuscosa , though A. rutila is extensively red-marked ( Fig. 6A–D View Fig ), and A. ephippium is predominantly dark ( Fig. 7A–D View Fig ); this colour variation can be found across the range of A. fuscosa without clear geographic gradients or patterns other than that red colouration is both more frequent and covers a greater proportion of the body in hotter and drier environments. The A. ephippium specimen is damaged and is missing its head, but structurally can clearly be identified as A. fuscosa . The two specimens may automatically be holotypes, but since this is not clear from Spinola’s original descriptions, they are here designated as lectotypes.

Distribution

Palaearctic, from the Canary Islands to Central Asia and northern India ( Gusenleitner & Schwarz 2002).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Andrenidae

Genus

Andrena

SubGenus

Taeniandrena

Loc

Andrena (Melanapis) fuscosa Erichson, 1835

Wood, Thomas James 2023
2023
Loc

Andrena (Melanapis) rutila

Spinola M. 1838: 510
1838
Loc

Andrena (Melanapis) ephippium

Spinola M. 1838: 511
1838
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF