Bombus convexus Wang
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4204.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C050058A-774D-49C0-93F9-7A055B51C2A0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5625289 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE6754-7C4D-332D-B090-A088A7ADFB04 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Bombus convexus Wang |
status |
|
3. Bombus convexus Wang View in CoL
( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1 ‒ 6 , 26 View FIGURES 24 ‒ 35 , 39, 41 View FIGURES 36 ‒ 55 , 58 View FIGURES 56 ‒ 67 )
< Bombus View in CoL > lugubris Morawitz 1880:339 View in CoL (not of Kriechbaumer 1870:159, = B. barbutellus (Kirby) View in CoL s. l.), type-locality citation ‘Gan-su’. Holotype worker by monotypy ZISP examined, ( Cyrillic ) ‘[Gansu]’ (but probably actually Qinghai, China). Synonymised with Bombus convexus Wang View in CoL by Williams (1991). Note 1.
Bombus lugubris Morawitz; Morawitz 1881 View in CoL :243; Wu 1941:281.
Mendacibombus lugubris (Morawitz) ; Skorikov 1923:149; Skorikov, 1931:213.
Bombus (Mendacibombus) lugubris Morawitz View in CoL ; Bischoff 1936:17; Panfilov 1957:235; Tkalců 1961:369.
Bombus (Mendacibombus) convexus Wang, 1979:190 View in CoL , type-locality citation (Chinese) ‘[Xizang: Markam]’. Holotype queen by original designation IZB examined, ( Chinese ) ‘[Markam]’ (Xizang, China).
Bombus (Mendacibombus) convexus Wang; S.-F. Wang 1982 View in CoL :429; Yao & Wang 2005:890; P.H. Williams 1991:42; S.- F. Wang 1992:1424; P.H. Williams 1998:100; P.H. Williams 2004:no. 26; Cameron et al. 2007:165; P.H. Williams et al. 2009:130; An et al. 2011:5; An et al. 2014.
Note 1 ( lugubris View in CoL ). The original publication specifies that there was only one type (worker) specimen of the taxon lugubris Morawitz View in CoL , so the worker in the ZISP collection is regarded as the holotype by monotypy ( ICZN, 1999: Article 73.1.2).
Etymology. The species is named from the Latin convexus for ‘rounded’, a reference to a pronounced convexity or rounded posterior projection of the median posterior edge of metasomal T 2 in the original description.
Taxonomy and variation. This species shows effectively a single colour pattern of the hair with little variation. This is the pattern in the original description, which is unique within the subgenus. All specimens have a white-banded and none has a yellow-banded colour pattern. The form of the female median posterior edge of T2 (although slightly variable) and of the male genitalia are diagnostic.
Diagnostic description. Wings nearly clear. Hair long, uneven and sparse. Female hair colour pattern: generally black, but with white hair intermixed especially as short hairs on the face, intermixed in a transverse band anteriorly on the thoracic dorsum and extending laterally and ventrally without black hairs to the midleg base, in a lateral patch posteriorly on the thoracic dorsum (lateral patch on the scutellum, metanotum, and propodeum, so that the thoracic dorsum between the wing bases has the hair entirely black), on T1 and anteriorly on T2, and intermixed on T4‒6 (cf. all other Mendacibombus species). Hindleg tibia with the corbicular fringes black, often with a few hairs with orange or white tips. Female morphology: labrum with the basal depression narrow, the transverse ridge moderately broad and high, medially not subsiding or interrupted and in the median third with scattered large punctures, lateral tubercles with a few scattered small punctures. T2 usually with a posteriorlydirected convexity of its median posterior edge, affecting a quarter of its breadth, especially pronounced in queens, for which there may be edge concavities and even slight pre-marginal depressions lateral to the convexity. Male morphology: beard of the mandible long, dense and black, but the short hairs and a few of the long hairs brown; T2 and sometimes T3 with posteriorly-directed convexities of their median posterior edge, affecting a quarter or less of their breadth. Genitalia ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 24 ‒ 35 ) with the volsella at its broadest near the midpoint of its length, the dorsal surface just distal to this point with a raised curved ridge, often with small teeth, just inside the inner margin, running for 0.3× the remaining distal length of the volsella; volsella distally sharply acute (pointed) and curled back dorsally and anteriorly. Gonostylus length 2× its greatest breadth. Penis-valve head length 0.25× the length of the penis valve distal to the broadest point of the spatha.
Material examined. 6 queens 296 workers 51 males, from China ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 56 ‒ 67 : AMNH, IAR, IZB, NHM, PW, SC, USNM, YT, ZISP, ZX), with 6 specimens sequenced (interpretable sequences listed in Figs. 11–13 View FIGURES 11 ‒ 12 View FIGURE 13 ).
Habitat and distribution. Flower-rich alpine and subalpine grassland, at elevations 2196‒(3449)‒ 4500 m a.s.l.. A species of the east Qinghai-Tibetan plateau, in the east Himalayan, Hengduan, and Qinghai-Gansu mountains, including the Min Shan and Qilian Shan. Compared to B. waltoni , distributions of the two species overlap broadly, but B. convexus extends less far to the north and west and tends to occur at lower elevation (and the two species rarely occur together at a site). Bombus convexus replaces the western B. avinoviellus in the lower alpine zone and upper forest wet meadows of the eastern Himalaya, where it appears to be rare. Regional distribution maps are available for Sichuan (P.H. Williams et al. 2009) and Gansu (An et al. 2011; An et al. 2014).
Food plants. Williams et al. (2009), An et al. (2011; 2014).
Behaviour. Mate-searching males perch on bare patches of ground and pursue other bees that fly past before the males return to the same perch (PW: Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 ‒ 6 , 29 View FIGURES 24 ‒ 35 .viii. 2009, 3339 m Diebu , Gansu, China).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Bombus convexus Wang
Williams, Paul H., Huang, Jiaxing, Rasmont, Pierre & An, Jiandong 2016 |
Bombus (Mendacibombus) convexus
Williams 2009: 130 |
Cameron 2007: 165 |
Yao 2005: 890 |
Williams 1998: 100 |
Wang 1992: 1424 |
Williams 1991: 42 |
Wang 1982: 429 |
Bombus (Mendacibombus) lugubris
Tkalcu 1961: 369 |
Panfilov 1957: 235 |
Bischoff 1936: 17 |
Mendacibombus lugubris
Skorikov 1931: 213 |
Skorikov 1923: 149 |
Bombus lugubris
Wu 1941: 281 |
Morawitz 1881: 243 |