Domene (Macromene) emeiana, Assing, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.21248/contrib.entomol.65.2.263-285 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE7479-6428-FF8C-FF6C-F94F280F5347 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Domene (Macromene) emeiana |
status |
sp. nov. |
Domene (Macromene) emeiana View in CoL spec. nov.
( Figs 25–39 View Figs 25–39 , Map 1 View Map 1 )
Type material: Holotype : “P. R. CHINA, Sichuan, Emei Shan, N29°33'51", E103°20'47", 23.v.2011, 1779 m, sift03, V. Grebennikov / Holotypus Domene emeiana spec. nov., det. V. Assing 2014 ” ( CAS).
Paratypes: 1 : same data as holotype (cSme); 1 : “P. R. CHINA, Sichuan, Emei Shan, N29°33'00", E103°21'38", 28.v.2011, 1639 m, sift08, V. Grebennikov ” (cAss); 5 [listed as Domene sp. in Feldmann et al. (2014)]: “P. R. CHINA, Sichuan, Emei Shan, N29°33.6', E103°20.6', 27.iv.–5.vii.2009, 1800–2400 m, sifting 11–17, V. Grebennikov” ( CAS, cSme, cAss, cFel); 1 [identification based on a photo sent by B. Feldmann; label in Chinese, translated by Zhong Peng]: “ Sichuan, Emei Shan, Jiulaodong [ca. 29°33'N, 103°21'E, 1850 m], Nanchong normal college / 25-VII-1983, collector: I-116” (cRou) GoogleMaps .
Etymology: The specific epithet (adjective) is derived from the name of the mountain, where the species was discovered.
Description: Body length 8.0– 9.50 mm; length of forebody 4.4–4.7 mm. Forebody as in Fig. 25 View Figs 25–39 . Coloration: forebody brown, with the humeral angles of the elytra mostly slightly and indistinctly paler; abdomen bicoloured, with segments III–VI dark-yellowish to reddish, segment VII infuscate with the anterior portion broadly, and the posterior margin narrowly yellowish to reddish, segment VIII with the anterior half and the posterior margin yellowish and with a broad transverse brown band in posterior half, segments IX–X darkyellowish to pale-reddish; legs dark-yellowish; antennae dark-reddish, with antennomere XI apically paler.
Head ( Fig. 26 View Figs 25–39 ) of conspicuously subcircular to oval shape, 1.05–1.10 times as long as broad; punctation rather fine, distinctly umbilicate, and very dense, rendering the surface rather matt. Eyes relatively small, 0.3–0.4 times as long as temples from posterior margin of eye to posterior constriction in dorsal view. Antenna ( Fig. 27 View Figs 25–39 ) 3.0– 3.3 mm long and moderately slender.
Pronotum ( Fig. 28 View Figs 25–39 ) slender, approximately 1.25 times as long as broad and 0.95–1.00 times as broad as head, lateral margins subparallel in the middle; punctation similar to that of head; midline with very short and narrow rudiment of a glossy line posteriorly, this glossy line with a fine median furrow.
Elytra ( Fig. 29 View Figs 25–39 ) short and slender, only approximately 0.6 times as long and 0.95 times as broad as pronotum; disc distinctly and extensively impressed anteriorly, without longitudinal ridges; punctation irregular and dense, very coarse in anterior half and less coarse posteriorly, partly rugose; suture elevated; Hind wings completely reduced. Protarsomeres I–IV with distinct sexual dimorphism.
Abdomen 1.2 times as broad as elytra; punctation extremely fine and dense; anterior impressions of tergites III–VI coarsely and somewhat rugosely sculptured; interstices with shallow microsculpture; posterior margin of tergite VII without palisade fringe; tergite VIII with posterior margin obtusely angled or convex in the middle ( Fig. 37 View Figs 25–39 ).
: protarsomeres I–IV strongly dilated; sternites V and VI with shallow and rather small postero-median impression ( Fig. 30 View Figs 25–39 ); sternite VII ( Figs 30–31 View Figs 25–39 ) conspicuously tranverse, more than twice as broad as long (length measured along the middle), with pronounced and extensive median impression, this impression with numerous strongly modified, short and stout black setae in characteristic arrangement, posterior margin broadly concave; sternite VIII ( Figs 30, 32 View Figs 25–39 ) strongly transverse, nearly 1.5 times as broad as long, with a rather pronounced oblong postero-median impression with a (posteriorly denser) cluster of numerous strongly modified, short and stout black setae, posterior margin with a long and nearly acute process on either side of the U-shaped posterior excision; aedeagus ( Figs 33–36 View Figs 25–39 ) approximately 1.5 mm long and of very distinctive morphology; ventral process massive, blade-shaped, and strongly sclerotized; dorsal plate distinctly sclerotized, basally lamellate and apically extending into a narrow and acute process; internal sac with dark sclerites and with apical structure of distinctive shape.
: protarsomeres I–IV distinctly dilated, but somewhat less so than in male; sternite VIII ( Fig. 38 View Figs 25–39 ) distinctly transverse, approximately 1.35 times as broad as long, and with broadly convex posterior margin; tergite IX ( Fig. 39 View Figs 25–39 ) with very short antero-median portion and with relatively short and apically acute postero-lateral processes; tergite X flat and approximately 3.5 times as long as antero-median portion of tergite IX ( Fig. 39 View Figs 25–39 ).
Comparative notes: This highly distinctive species is separated from all other Domene species recorded from China by numerous external and sexual characters, i.e., the coloration of the abdomen, the nearly circular head, the smaller eyes, distinctly shorter and more slender elytra, the conspicuous shapes and chaetotaxy of the male sternites VII and VIII, the completely different morphology of the aedeagus (shapes of ventral process, of dorsal plate, and of internal structures), the strongly transverse female sternite VIII, and the remarkably short antero-median portion of the female tergite IX. Except for D. immarginata and D. affimbriata , it is additionally distinguished from all other Chinese representatives of the genus by the reduced wings and the absence of a palisade fringe at the posterior margin of tergite VII. In fact, D. emeiana is so derived in so many respects that closer affiliations with any other Domene species known from China are not evident.
Distribution and natural history: The adaptive reductions of the eyes, the wings and the palisade fringe at the posterior margin of tergite VII, as well as the absence of records from other regions suggest that D. emeiana is endemic to the Emei Shan in Sichuan ( Map 1 View Map 1 ). The specimens were sifted at altitudes between 1640 and 2400 m.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
CAS |
California Academy of Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |