Himalaphantes aduncus, Irfan & Zhang & Peng, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.8.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E0F8FFFD-A68E-4F2B-990A-386C3FAB2A09 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7541385 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE87CE-BD3C-FFE5-FC8C-389FFF0EFBA7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Himalaphantes aduncus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Himalaphantes aduncus sp. nov. (NḦẲĦƦ)
Figures 129–131 View FIGURE 129 View FIGURE 130 View FIGURE 131 , 146 View FIGURE 146
Types. Holotype ♂, CHINA, Yunnan, Lushui County, Yaojiaping, at Pianma Road 44.7 km, 25.97479°N, 98.71027°E, alt. 2516m, disturbed forest; dusting webs in understory, 19–20 May 2005, Charles Griswold leg. ( CGY111 ) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 2♂ 1♀, same data as holotype ( CGY111 ); GoogleMaps 1♂ 1♀, Fugong County, Lumadeng Township , Yaping Village , Shibali , 27.16515°N, 98.77975°E, alt. 2527m, 01 May 2004, Guang-xu Peng leg. (20040501– 1); GoogleMaps 2♂, Long yang County, Ba wan Township, Dong feng bridge, 24.98535ºN, 98.87383ºE, 670m, beach of Nu Jiang river, 29 May 2005, Heng-mei Yan and Ke-ji Guo leg. ( GKJ031 ) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. This epithet derives from the Latin adjective “ aduncus ”, meaning “hook”, referring to the hook-shaped dorsal tip of the distal suprategular apophysis in the male palp.
Diagnosis. The male of new species resembles that of Himalaphantes pseudoaduncus sp. nov. in having the similar distal suprategular apophysis; proximal cymbial apophysis and lamella characteristca sinuous, extending ventrally ( Fig. 129A–D View FIGURE 129 ; Fig. 142A–D View FIGURE 142 ), but can be distinguished by the proximal projection of distal arm of paracymbium finger-shaped in H. aduncu s sp. nov. ( Fig. 129B, D View FIGURE 129 ), whereas beak-shaped in H. pseudoaduncus sp. nov. ( Fig. 142B, D View FIGURE 142 ). The distal tip of radix round in H. aduncu s sp. nov. ( Fig. 129A View FIGURE 129 ), whereas somewhat rectangular in H. pseudoaduncus sp. nov. ( Fig. 142A View FIGURE 142 ). The thumb not completely covered by the embolus in H. aduncu s sp. nov. ( Fig. 129A View FIGURE 129 ), whereas completely covered in H. pseudoaduncus sp. nov. ( Fig. 142A View FIGURE 142 ). Female resembles that of H. fugongensis sp. nov. in having the similar stretcher and posterior median plate in epigyne ( Fig. 130A, C View FIGURE 130 ; Fig. 138A, C View FIGURE 138 ) but can be distinguished by the spermathecae bean-shaped in H. aduncus sp. nov. ( Fig. 130B, C View FIGURE 130 ), whereas L-shaped in H. fugongensis sp. nov. ( Fig. 138B, C View FIGURE 138 ). Scape with a deep depression at the centre, the lateral lobe absent in H. aduncus sp. nov. ( Fig. 130A, B View FIGURE 130 ), whereas the central depression not very deep, the lateral lobe present on each side in H. fugongensis sp. nov. ( Fig. 138A, B View FIGURE 138 ).
Description: Male (holotype, Fig. 131A, B View FIGURE 131 ): Total length: 3.41; carapace 1.59 long, 1.23 wide, yellowish brown;cephalic region slightly elevated, with a longitudinal brown band, lateral sides brown; fovea, cervical and radial grooves distinct. Clypeus 0.32 high. Sternum longer than wide, brown. Labium wider than long, brown. Maxillae long, distal end broad with scopulae. Chelicerae yellowish brown, much longer, with two promarginal and three retromarginal teeth. Eye region narrow, AER recurved, PER straight, slightly wider than AER. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.10, ALE 0.12, PME 0.11, PLE 0.11, AME–AME 0.04, AME–ALE, 0.06 PME–PME 0.06, PME–PLE 0.07, AME–PME, 0.11, ALE–ALE 0.53, PLE–PLE 0.55, ALE–PLE 0.02. Legs with annuli; length of legs: I 8.77 (2.31, 2.92, 2.23, 1.31), II 7.31 (1.98, 2.43, 1.89, 1.01), III 4.57 (1.23, 1.49, 1.22, 0.63), IV 6.38 (1.78, 1.91, 1.74, 0.95); leg formula I-II-IV-III. Tm I 0.76 and Tm IV 0.55. Tibial dorsal spine formula: 2-2-2-2. Abdomen 1.82 long, 0.98 wide, oval, gray-black, proximal end with a pair of oblique white bands followed by irregular white patches extending posteriorly: ventral side yellowish, with irregular greenish-grey and white patches.
Palp ( Fig. 129A–D View FIGURE 129 ): Patella half as long as tibia, dorsally with a long thick spine; tibia longer than wide, with two retrolateral and one dorsal trichobothria. Cymbium with a prolateral shallow notch, proximal cymbial apophysis present with blunt end. Paracymbium with fine spines proximally, distal part with a small finger-shaped projection, its distal arm wider than long with blunt end. Distal suprategular apophysis sclerotized, dorsal tip hook-shaped, ventral margin transparent. Radix longer than wide, distal tip round. Lamella characteristca sinuous extending forward with serrated tip. Median membrane broad, curved distally. Embolus small, with pointed tip attached to small thumb.
Female (one of paratypes, Fig. 131C, D View FIGURE 131 ): Total length: 3.11; carapace 1.39 long, 1.09 wide, yellow; cephalic region slightly elevated, with a longitudinal brown band, lateral sides brown; fovea, cervical and radial grooves distinct. Clypeus 0.33 high. Sternum longer than wide, brown. Labium wider than long, brown. Maxillae long, distal end broad with scopulae. Chelicerae yellowish brown,
with three promarginal and three retromarginal teeth. Eye region narrow, AER recurved, PER straight, slightly wider than AER. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.08, ALE 0.12, PME 0.11, PLE 0.10, AME–AME 0.05, AME–ALE, 0.06 PME–PME 0.06, PME–PLE 0.06, AME–PME, 0.13, ALE–ALE 0.49, PLE–PLE 0.53, ALE–PLE 0.03. Legs with annuli; length of legs: I 7.32 (2.03, 2.36, 1.82, 1.11), II 6.25 (1.81, 1.95, 1.54, 0.95), III 4.61 (1.43, 1.35, 1.14, 0.69), IV 5.85 (1.75, 1.83, 1.41, 0.86); leg formula I-II-IV-III. Tm I 0.61 and Tm IV 0.48. Tibial dorsal spine formula: 2-2-2- 2. Abdomen 1.77 long, 1.19 wide, oval, yellow, proximal end with a longitudinal band followed by irregular brown patches extending posteriorly; ventral side yellow, with irregular brown and white patches.
Epigyne ( Fig. 130A–C View FIGURE 130 ): Scape wider than long, with a deep depression posteriorly; stretcher longer than wide with round end. copulatory openings present in lateral pockets. Entrance grooves sinuous. Posterior median plate rectangular. Spermathecae relatively large, beanshaped.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality ( Fig. 146 View FIGURE 146 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |