Parapontophilus sibogae, Komai, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5393746 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:64CFDA2E-D606-4B3D-9A5B-E2FDF9B6974E |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AEC142-5705-FF83-48B9-FDE2247A887F |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Parapontophilus sibogae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Parapontophilus sibogae n. sp.
( Figs 30 View FIG ; 31 View FIG ; 36 View FIG )
Pontophilus modumanuensis View in CoL – De Man 1920: 270 (in part), pl. 21, fig. 64f-j. Not Pontophilus modumanuensis Rathbun, 1906 View in CoL .
TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype: Indonesia. Siboga , stn 89, Pulu Kaniungan Ketjil, 11 m, coral bottom, 21. VI.1899, ovig. ♀ 5.9 mm ( ZMA). Paratype: same data as holotype, 1 ovig. ♀ 5.9 mm ( ZMA).
ETYMOLOGY. — The specific name is derived from the research vessel name, Siboga .
DISTRIBUTION. — Known only from Pulu Kaniungan Ketjil, Celebes Sea ( Fig. 36 View FIG ), 11 m.
DESCRIPTION
Rostrum ( Fig. 30 View FIG A-C) narrow triangular in dorsal view, 0.14 of carapace length, directed forward, straight, falling short of distal margins of corneas; lateral margins armed with 2 pairs of small teeth, anterior pair arising distal to midlength of rostrum. Carapace ( Fig. 30A, B, D View FIG ) 1.30 times longer than wide; anterior epigastric tiny tooth, with minute accessory denticle; posterior epigastric tooth moderately small, supported by middorsal ridge reaching beyond midlength of carapace; cardiac tooth absent; postorbital tooth very small; epibranchial tooth absent; epibranchial ridge obsolete; branchiostegal tooth moderately large, reaching dorsodistal margin of antennal basicerite.
Third pleonal somite ( Fig. 30E View FIG ) with moderately convex tergum and with moderately produced posterodorsal margin. Fifth somite ( Fig. 30E, F View FIG ) rounded dorsally. Sixth somite ( Fig. 30E, F View FIG ) 2.30 times longer than wide, 2.00 times longer than deep, 2.30 length of fifth somite; dorsal surface rounded.
Eye ( Fig. 30A View FIG ) subpyriform; cornea light yellow in preservative; corneal surface distinctly faceted with moderately small lenses; maximal diameter of cornea 0.13 of carapace length; eye-stalk weakly constricted; mesial face without papilla-like projection. Antennular peduncle ( Fig. 30A View FIG ) reaching midlength of antennal scale. Antennal scale ( Fig. 30A, G View FIG ) 0.44-0.52 of carapace length and 2.50-2.60 times longer than wide; lateral margin straight, lamella strongly produced, distinctly overreaching distolateral tooth.
Palm of first pereopod ( Fig. 31A, B View FIG ) 3.30-3.50 times longer than wide; pollex moderately small, width of palm including tip of pollex about 1.20-1.30 of width proximal to base of pollex; cutting edge moderately oblique; merus with relatively weak dorsodistal tooth. Second pereopod slightly overreaching midlength of merus of first pereopod. Fourth pereopod ( Fig. 31C View FIG ) overreaching distal margin of antennal scale by half to full length of dactylus; dactylus elongate, subspatulate, 0.88-0.94 or propodal length; carpus about 0.60 of propodal length. Fifth pereopod ( Fig. 31D View FIG ) similar to fourth, slightly falling short of distal margin of antennal scale.
Male unknown.
Coloration in life
Unknown.
Size
Males unavailable; ovigerous females CL 5.9 mm.
REMARKS
As mentioned before, P.sibogae n. sp. appears closest to P.demani .Nevertheless, P.sibogae n.sp. is characteristic within the species group in having a proportionally shorter and broader antennal scale ( Table 2). Furthermore, P. sibogae n. sp. is distinguished from P. demani by the proportionally shorter rostrum, the smaller anterior epigastric tooth of the carapace (cf. Figs 30D View FIG and 22E View FIG ), the more strongly produced distal lamella of the antennal scale (cf. Figs 30G View FIG ; 22I View FIG ) and the proportionally longer dactylus of the fourth pereopod (cf. Figs 31C View FIG ; 23D View FIG ) ( Table 2).
The two type specimens were initially identified by de Man (1920) as Pontophilus modumanuensis . The bathymetrical record of this new species is exceptionally shallow for the genus, and it remains unclear that P. sibogae n. sp. is really an inhabitant of shallow water.
VI |
Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute |
ZMA |
Universiteit van Amsterdam, Zoologisch Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Parapontophilus sibogae
Komai, Tomoyuki 2008 |
Pontophilus modumanuensis
MAN J. G. & DE 1920: 270 |