Orphnus bicolor ( Fabricius, 1801 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.767.1485 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9B651F61-7F2B-4D46-9390-4F54F8AEB0AE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5514749 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AEE578-9D44-3E22-770C-D4EE7786F938 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Orphnus bicolor ( Fabricius, 1801 ) |
status |
|
Orphnus bicolor ( Fabricius, 1801)
Fig. 4 View Fig
Scarabaeus bicolor Fabricius, 1801: 9 View in CoL .
Orphnus bicolor – MacLeay 1819: 119. — Westwood 1845: 176. — Lacordaire 1856: 130 (catalogue). — Gemminger & Harold 1869: 1072 (catalogue). — Arrow 1912: 29 (catalogue). — Schmidt 1913: 79 (catalogue). — Frolov 2012: 793 (catalogue).
Differential diagnosis
Orphnus bicolor is similar to O. parvus in having the pronotum without tubercle on base medially and endophallus with a few groups of spinules. It differs from the latter in having the parameres in dorsal view with small but distinct notches basad of the lateral teeth ( Fig. 4F View Fig ), longer parameres (about 0.7 length of phallobase [ Fig. 4E View Fig ] as opposed to 0.5 length of phallobase in O. parvus [ Fig. 5E View Fig ]), and abdominal sternite 8 medially longer than sternites 4–7 combined (as opposed to sternite 8 medially as long as sternites 4–7 combined in O. parvus ).
Type material
Lectotype (here designated, Fig. 4 A – F View Fig ) INDIA • ♂; “ TYPE / Ind. orient. Daldorff Mus. T. Lund Geotrupes bicolor F. / Lectotype Geotrupes bicolor F. A.Frolov des. 2016”; ZMUKG .
Paralectotype INDIA • 1 ♂; “ TYPE / Paralectotype Geotrupes bicolor F. A.Frolov des. 2016”; ZMUKG .
Additional material examined
SRI LANKA – Central Province • 1 ♂; Weragamtota ; 7°19′ N, 80°59′ E; 13 Sep. 1953; F. Keiser leg.; NHMB GoogleMaps . – Southern Province • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Tissamaharana ; 6°17′ N, 81°17′ E; 30 Oct. 1983; MNHN GoogleMaps .
Variation
Body length of the examined specimens varies from 7.5 to 9.0 mm (males) and 8.6 mm (female).
Distribution
The species was described form “East India ”. In Sri Lanka, it is known from two rather distant localities in the centre and on the southern coast ( Fig. 4I View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Orphnus bicolor ( Fabricius, 1801 )
Frolov, Andrey V. & Akhmetova, Lilia A. 2021 |
Orphnus bicolor
Frolov A. V. 2012: 793 |
Schmidt A. 1913: 79 |
Arrow G. J. 1912: 29 |
Gemminger M. & Harold E. 1869: 1072 |
Lacordaire T. 1856: 130 |
Westwood J. O. 1845: 176 |
MacLeay W. S. 1819: 119 |
Scarabaeus bicolor
Fabricius J. C. 1801: 9 |