Didymocheton Blume, Bijdr. Fl. Ned. Ind.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1002/tax.12591 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14057867 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AF174D-9D24-FF9D-456A-BAF20EE1F9ED |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Didymocheton Blume, Bijdr. Fl. Ned. Ind. |
status |
|
I. Didymocheton Blume, Bijdr. Fl. Ned. Ind. View in CoL : 177. 1825 ≡
Dysoxylum subg. Didymocheton (Blume) Hook.f. in Bentham & Hooker, Gen. Pl. 1: 333. 1862 ≡ Dysoxylum sect. Didymocheton (Blume) Miq. in Ann. Bot. Lugduno-Batavi 4: 8. 1868 – Type: Didymocheton nutans Blume.
= Hartighsea A. Juss. in Bull. Sci. Nat. Géol. 23: 237. 1830 ≡ Dysoxylum subg. Hartighsea (A.Juss.) Hook.f. in Bentham & Hooker, Gen. Pl. 1: 333. 1862 – Type not indicated.
= Cambania Comm. ex M.Roem., Fam. Nat. Syn. Monogr. 1: 83, 102. 1846 – Type: Cambania fraseriana View in CoL (A.Juss.) M.Roem. ≡ Didymocheton fraserianus View in CoL (A.Juss.) Mabb. & Hauenschild.
= Macrochiton M.Roem., Fam. Nat. Syn. Monogr. 1: 84, 104. 1846 – Type not indicated.
= Meliadelpha Radlk. in Sitzungsber. Math.-Phys. Cl. Königl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. München 20: 331. 1891 – Type: Meliadelpha oceanica (W.Bull) Radlk. = Didymocheton bijugus (Labill.) Holzmeyer & Mabb.
Distribution. – Forty-three species, Indo-Pacific, almost all east of Wallace’ s Line, to Tonga, with particularly high endemism in New Guinea, New Caledonia and Fiji, which distribution greatly contrasts with those of all the other genera considered here.
Note. – The generic name has often been treated as neuter, but it is masculine, like the contemporary Chisocheton Blume.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Didymocheton Blume, Bijdr. Fl. Ned. Ind.
Holzmeyer, Laura, Hauenschild, Frank, Mabberley, David J. & Muellner-Riehl, Alexandra N. 2021 |
Hartighsea
Bentham & Hooker 1862: 333 |
A. Juss. 1830: 237 |