Diplopeltoides pumilus ( Vincx & Gourbault, 1992 ) Holovachov & Boström, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2017.369 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:67FB160D-14E1-4970-8190-4F927DDC4DC4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3852350 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AF6849-FFA6-FFAB-FE72-9C14FC05C59A |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Diplopeltoides pumilus ( Vincx & Gourbault, 1992 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Diplopeltoides pumilus ( Vincx & Gourbault, 1992) comb. nov.
Fig. 8 View Fig ; Table 5 View Table 5
Diagnosis
Diplopeltoides pumilus is characterised by by a body of 0.43–0.58 mm long; cuticle with longitudinal striation; cuticularised plate absent; cephalic sensilla setiform, 2–3 µm long; amphidial fovea an inverted U-shape, 8–17 µm long and 8–11 µm wide in female and 13–19 µm long and 8–9 µm wide in male; narrow space between amphidial branches not ornamented; secretory-excretory pore indistinct; tail conoid; testes opposed; spicules 24–27 µm long, strongly curved, with weakly defined manubrium and conoid shaft; gubernaculum plate-like, without apophyses.
Material examined
SWEDEN: 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Gullmarn Fjord near Fiskebäckskil, 58°15′13″ N, 11°27′31″ E, mud from 30–39 m deep, 21 Aug. 2010, M. Clément leg. (SMNH-159551); 1 ♂, Skagerrak, 58°20′06″ N, 11°09′24″ E, muddy sediment from 53 m deep, 9 Aug. 2011, O. Holovachov leg. (SMNH-159549); 2 ♀♀, Gullmarn Fjord near Fiskebäckskil, 58°15′09″ N, 11°27′54″ E, muddy sand from 8–15 m deep, 11 Aug. 2011, O. Holovachov leg. (SMNH-159550).
Description
Adult
Body cylindrical, posteriorly tapering in tail region, straight or curved upon fixation. Cuticle coarsely annulated along entire body, except for smooth anterior end (annulation starts at level of anterior ¼ of amphid) and terminal part of tail; annules 2.5 µm wide at mid-body region; longitudinal striation is distinct under light microscope, covers annules over entire body length. Somatic setae present on tail. Labial region bluntly rounded. Cuticularised plate underlying cephalic cuticle around amphid absent. Inner and outer labial sensilla not seen. Cephalic sensilla setiform, equal to 0.2–0.3 labial region diameters in length, their bases are located 2–5 µm from anterior end. Amphids similar in shape and size between sexes: amphidial fovea an inverted U-shape with branches equal in length. Narrow space between amphidial branches (amphidial shield) not cuticularised and not ornamented. Stoma very small, its cuticularised lining is uniform with lining of pharynx. Pharynx distinctly subdivided into anterior corpus and posterior postcorpus; corpus cylindrical or slightly fusiform, muscular; postcorpus consists of anterior narrow non-muscular isthmus and pear-shaped glandular basal swelling. Pharyngeal gland nuclei and orifices indistinct. Nerve ring surrounding isthmus. Secretory-excretory system indistinct. Tail conoid. Caudal glands opening via three separate openings, spinneret absent.
Female
Reproductive system didelphic, amphidelphic, reflexed; ovary branches symmetrical. Anterior ovary situated to either right or left of intestine; posterior ovary situated to either left or right of intestine. Vulva located immediately posterior to mid-body. Vagina straight, 0.2 of the vulval body diameter, with thick walls; pars refringens vaginae absent. Intrauterine egg not seen; sperm is sometimes visible in the uterus. Rectum short, 0.7–0.8 of corresponding body diameter long.
Male
Reproductive system diorchic, testes opposed: anterior testis outstretched and posterior testis reflexed. Spicules paired and symmetrical, strongly curved, with weakly defined manubrium and conoid shaft. Gubernaculum plate-like, without apophyses. Caudal setae present, arranged in subventral and subdorsal rows but difficult to observe and count.
Remarks
The recently collected population of D. pumilus is similar to the type specimen in general morphology and measurements, structure of cuticle and anterior end, differing only in the larger body size (0.50– 0.58 mm vs 0.29 mm in the type specimen), the longer amphid (16–19 µm vs 10 µm in the type specimen), the longer tail (c’= 4.0–4.5 vs c’= 3.5 in the type specimen) and the longer spicules (24–26 µm vs 19 µm in the type specimen). It is also similar to D. holovachovi from the Sea of Japan in general morphology, structure of cuticle and anterior end, except for the longer body (0.50–0.58 mm vs 0.43–0.50 mm in D. holovachovi ) and less pronounced sexual dimorphism in the shape of the amphid (more elongated in females vs more rounded in females from the type population).
Sex | Female | Male |
---|---|---|
Number of specimens | 3 | 2 |
Body length | 543 (520–564) | 504; 578 |
Body diameter (BD) | 36 (32–38) | 22; 28 |
Pharynx length | 115 (107–121) | 121; 119 |
Tail length | 81 (77–85) | 77; 91 |
Anal body diameter (ABD) | 20 (19–21) | 17; 21 |
a | 15.3 (14.6–16.4) | 22.8; 20.4 |
b | 4.7 (4.6–4.9) | 4.2; 4.8 |
c | 6.7 (6.6–6.8) | 6.5; 6.3 |
c’ | 4.0 (4.0–4.1) | 4.5; 4.4 |
V or T (%) | 52.4 (52.1–52.9) | ?; 44.5 |
Labial region diameter | 10.4 (10.0–12.0) | 8.0; 10.5 |
Cephalic setae length | 2.5 (2.0–3.0) | 3.0; 2.0 |
Amphid from anterior end | 6.7 (6.0–7.0) | 6.0; 5.0 |
Dorsal amphid branch length | 16.3 (16.0–16.5) | 19.0; 16.0 |
Ventral amphid branch length | 16.1 (15.0–16.5) | 19.0; 16.0 |
Amphid width | 9.0 (7.5–10.5) | 9.0; 8.0 |
Nerve ring from anterior end | 65 (62–68) | 65; 68 |
Nerve ring from anterior end as % of pharynx length | 58 (56–58) | 53; 57 |
Anterior gonad length (to flexure) | 107 (95–130) | – |
Posterior gonad length (to flexure) | 97 (77–119) | – |
Vagina or spicules length | 8 (7–9) | 24; 26 |
Rectum or gubernaculum length | 14 (14–15) | 4; 8 |
Vagina length / BD | 0.2 | – |
Rectum or spicules / ABD | 0.7 (0.7–0.8) | 1.4; 1.3 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |