Anagrus (Anagrus) bakkendorfi Soyka, 1946
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4941.4.9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4618286 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AF87A2-FFE3-4227-958E-C2ECFB6603C1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Anagrus (Anagrus) bakkendorfi Soyka, 1946 |
status |
|
Anagrus (Anagrus) bakkendorfi Soyka, 1946 View in CoL
( Figs 1–13 View FIGURES 1–6 View FIGURES 7–9 View FIGURES 10–13 )
Anagrus armatus var. nigriceps Girault 1915: 276 View in CoL . Type locality: Corvallis, Benton County, Oregon, USA. Lectotype female [USNM], designated by Chiappini et al. (1996: 578), on slide; examined ( Chiappini et al. 1996: 578).
Anagrus bakkendorfi Soyka 1946: 40 View in CoL . Type locality: Valkenburg, Limburg, the Netherlands. Oldest available replacement name for A. nigriceps Girault 1915: 276 View in CoL ( A. armatus var. nigriceps View in CoL ) nec A. nigriceps ( Smits van Burgst 1914: 125–127) View in CoL ( Litus nigriceps View in CoL ). Holotype female [NHMW] on W. Soyka’s slide #340; examined ( Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 121).
Anagrus latipennis Soyka 1956: 24 View in CoL . Type locality (of the lectotype female on W. Soyka’s slide # 417 in NHMW, effectively designated by Chiappini 1989: 107 [an invalid designation of a holotype]): Jettchenshof [as “Jettchens Hof”; a farm adjacent to the woods, ca. 1 km E of Pisede, ca. 53°46’N 12°46’E, 12 m, formerly in Landkreis Demmin], Malchin, Mecklenburgische Seenplatte, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany; examined ( Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 121). Synonymy with A. bakkendorfi View in CoL by Chiappini 1989: 106–107.
Anagrus avalae Soyka 1956: 24 View in CoL . Type locality (of the lectotype female on W. Soyka’s slide # 338 in NHMW, effectively designated by Chiappini 1989: 108 [an invalid designation of a holotype]): Mt. Avala, Belgrade, Serbia; Chiappini & Triapitsyn, 1999: 120–124 (then oldest available replacement name for A. nigriceps Girault 1915: 276 View in CoL ( A. armatus var. nigriceps View in CoL ) nec Anagrus nigriceps ( Smits van Burgst 1914: 125–127) View in CoL ( Litus nigriceps View in CoL ); examined ( Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 120). Syn. n.
Anagrus arcuatus Soyka 1956: 24 View in CoL . Type locality (of the lectotype female on W. Soyka’s slide # 335 in NHMW, effectively designated by Chiappini 1989: 108 [an invalid designation of a holotype]): Europe (possibly an unspecified locality in Burgenland, Austria because of an abbreviation “Bgld.” on the original label); examined ( Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 121). Synonymy with A. avalae View in CoL by Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 120–124. Syn. n.
Anagrus valkenburgensis Soyka 1956: 24 View in CoL . Type locality (of the lectotype female on W. Soyka’s slide # 494 in NHMW, effectively designated by Chiappini 1989: 107 [an invalid designation of a holotype]): Valkenburg, Limburg, the Netherlands; examined ( Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 121). Synonymy with A. avalae View in CoL by Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 120–124. Syn. n.
Anagrus diversicornis Soyka 1956: 24 View in CoL . Type locality (of the lectotype female on W. Soyka’s slide # 362 in NHMW, effectively designated by Chiappini 1989: 108 [an invalid designation of a holotype]): Valkenburg, Limburg, the Netherlands; examined ( Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 121). Synonymy with A. avalae View in CoL by Chiappini 1989: 108. Syn. n.
Anagrus incarnatus ssp. fuscus Boţoc 1963: 99 View in CoL , figs 5a–5d. Type locality (of the lost type (s), not specified): Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania; not examined. Synonymy with A. bakkendorfi View in CoL by Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy 2004: 29.
Anagrus nigriceps: Burks 1979: 1023 View in CoL (catalog).
Anagrus (Anagrus) bakkendorfi: Chiappini 1989:106–107 View in CoL (synonymy,redescription, type information); Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy 2004: 29–30 (synonymy, distribution, comments); Triapitsyn 2015: 12 (key), 27 (coded redescription, distribution, hosts), 42 (checklist, synonyms); Triapitsyn et al. 2020b: 568 (distribution).
Anagrus (Anagrus) avalae: Chiappini 1989: 108 View in CoL (synonymy, redescription, type information); Triapitsyn 2001: 282–284 (taxonomic history, identification, distribution and hosts in Australia and New Zealand); Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy 2004: 24–25 (distribution, host associations); Triapitsyn 2015: 12 (key), 27 (coded redescription, distribution, hosts), 41 (checklist, synonyms); Triapitsyn et al. 2019: 89 (molecular voucher), 94, 96 (genetic analysis); Triapitsyn et al. 2020a: 141 View Cited Treatment (host in Japan); Triapitsyn et al. 2020b: 568 View Cited Treatment (distribution).
Anagrus oregonensis Triapitsyn View in CoL in Chiappini et al. 1996: 578–579, then replacement name for A. nigriceps Girault 1915: 276 View in CoL ( A. armatus var. nigriceps View in CoL ) nec Anagrus nigriceps ( Smits van Burgst 1914: 125–127) View in CoL ( Litus nigriceps View in CoL ); synonymy with A. avalae View in CoL by Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 120–124. Syn. n.
Anagrus avalae: Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 120–124 View in CoL (taxonomic history, synonymy, type information, distribution, redescription of both sexes, illustrations, diagnosis, host associations).
Anagrus bakkendorfi: Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 121 View in CoL (type information including for A. latipennis View in CoL ), 124 (diagnosis, comments).
Material examined. NEARCTIC. CANADA. BRITISH COLUMBIA: Oliver, Eggert vineyard (Fairview Cellars winery), collected 5.ii.1999, emerged in Summerland 1.iii.1999, T. Lowery, K. Todd, from leafhopper eggs on wild rose [1 ♀ ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–6 ), 1 ³ ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ), UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 1999). Summerland, PARC Entomological Orchard, collected 1.vii.1999, emerged in 28.vii.1999, T. Lowery, K. Todd, from leafhopper eggs on dogwood [1 ♀, UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 1999). USA. CALIFORNIA: Alameda County, Albany, Gill Tract, 37°53’09’’N 122°17’58’’W, 10 m, S.H. Wilson, collected 28.viii.2013, emerged 30.viii.2013 from unknown host eggs on an unknown tree [1 ♀, UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2014). Mendocino County, Fetzer , 13244 Old River Road, 38°59’22’’N 123°06’15’’W, 153 m, S.H. Wilson, collected 30.viii.2013, emerged 8.ix.2013 from unknown host eggs on alder, Alnus sp. [1 ♀, UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2014). Sonoma County, Simi Chalk Hill, 38°38’05’’N 122°45’51’’W, 55 m, S.H. Wilson, from unknown host eggs on alder: collected 7.v.2012, emerged 8.v.2012 [1 ♀, UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2013); collected 3.xi.2013, emerged 9.xi.2013 [1 ♀, UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2015).
PALAEARCTIC. RUSSIA. MOSKOVSKAYA OBLAST’, Pushkinskiy rayon, Pushkino, Mamontovka, E.Ya. Shuvakhina, Malaise trap in garden: 10–20.vii.2000 [1 ♀, UCRC ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–6 )]; 20–31.vii.2000 [1 ♀, UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2000 and 2002, respectively). PRIMORSKIY KRAY, Ussuriyskiy rayon, Gornotayozhnoye, 43.66°N 132.25°E, 200 m, 21–31.vii.2000, M. V. Michailovskaya GoogleMaps , Malaise trap [1 ♀, UCRC] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn GoogleMaps in 2002). SPAIN. NAVARRA, Irati Forest GoogleMaps , Iratibizkar, E. Baquero: 1120 m (Malaise trap in Fagus sylvatica forest): 26.vii.2000 [1 ♀, MZNA], 10.viii.2000 [1 ♀, MZNA], 23.viii.2000 [11 ♀, MZNA; 5 ♀, UCRC ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–6 )], 7.ix.2000 [1 ³, UCRC ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–6 )] (identified as A. bakkendorfi by S. V. Triapitsyn GoogleMaps in 2004 except for 6 females in MZNA, collected 23.viii.2000, identified by S. V. Triapitsyn GoogleMaps in 2004 as A. avalae ); 42.970669°N 1.114398°W, 1154 m, 4.ix.2020, E. Baquero, yellow pan traps [3 ♀, MZNA (2, including molecular voucher PR20-511, UCRC _ ENT 00541253 View Materials ), UCRC (1, molecular voucher PR20-512, UCRC _ ENT 00541252 View Materials )] (identified as A. bakkendorfi by E. Baquero and S. V. Triapitsyn in 2020). UNITED KINGDOM. ENGLAND: Kent County, Sevenoaks, viii.2014, A. Polaszek, yellow pan traps in garden [1 ♀, UCRC, molecular voucher PR15-026, UCRC ENT 311795 View Materials ] (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2015). Surrey County, Woking, 25.vi.1885, F. Enock [1 ♀, MMUE] (on F. Enock’s slide #1332, labeled with his manuscript name “ Anagrus molsoni ”) (identified as A. avalae by S. V. Triapitsyn in 2014).
Updated diagnosis. FEMALE. Body color variable, from yellow or light brown except a darker anterior part of mesoscutum, to brown or dark brown except for pale frenum ( Figs 1, 3, 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Antennal funicle with multiporous plate sensilla on F3 (0 or 1) (absent from examined specimens with longer ovipositors that key to A. bakkendorfi in Triapitsyn 2015, Figs 7, 8 View FIGURES 7–9 ), F4 (1), F5 (0 ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 7–9 ) or 1 ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7–9 )), F6 (1 or 2). Fore wing ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 7–9 ) with 2 rows of setae behind and just beyond apex of venation. Ovipositor ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 10–13 View FIGURES 10–13 ) of variable length and extent of projection beyond gastral apex, 1.9–3.3× as long as protibia. Otherwise as redescribed by Chiappini & Triapitsyn (1999) for A. avalae and by Triapitsyn (2015) for both A. avalae and A. bakkendorfi .
MALE. As described and illustrated for A. avalae by Chiappini & Triapitsyn (1999). Body often notably darker ( Figs 2, 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ) than for some lighter colored females ( Figs 1, 3 View FIGURES 1–6 ).
Distribution. PALAEARCTIC (? Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iran, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom), AUSTRALASIAN ( Australia, New Zealand), NEARCTIC ( Canada, USA) ( Triapitsyn 2015; Triapitsyn et al. 2020b [also as A. avalae ]), and possibly NEOTROPICAL ( Chile), according to an unconfirmed record of Anagrus armatus nigriceps Girault by Guilleminot & Apablaza (1986), although this record far more likely results from a misidentification.
Almost certainly unintentionally introduced from Europe to Australia and New Zealand ( Triapitsyn 2001 [as A. avalae ]). It is unclear if its occurrence in the Nearctic region is due to its apparent natural Holarctic distribution or an accidental introduction from Europe; we would guess the latter scenario is more likely because in western North America this species is almost exclusively collected in agricultural and garden environments, which have not been well sampled in the eastern Nearctic region.
Hosts. Various Cicadellidae (Hemiptera) listed for A. avalae by Chiappini & Triapitsyn (1999), Triapitsyn (2001), Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy (2004), and Triapitsyn et al. (2020a).
Remarks. As expected, based on the morphological predictive assessment ( Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999; Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy 2004), specimens PR20-511 and PR20-512 identified as A. bakkendorfi , in which the ovipositor is 3.0× and 3.3× the length of the protibia, respectively, were found to be genetically very similar to the specimen PR15-026 identified as A. avalae , in which the ovipositor is 2.1× the length of the protibia. Sequences of the nuclear ribosomal ITS2 gene from specimens PR20-511 and PR20-512 (GenBank accessions MW633070 View Materials and MW633071 View Materials , respectively) were the same length (+/- 1bp) as three cloned sequences previously obtained from PR15-026 ( MK024915 View Materials –17), and were 98.7–99.6% similar, with no consistent substitutions present. Those of the mitochondrial COI gene ( MW633277 View Materials and MW633278 View Materials ) bore 95.9 % similarity with the single COI sequence from PR15-026 ( MK024808 View Materials ). Taken together, these levels of similarity are a strong indication of conspecificity, hence the here proposed synonymy of A. avalae (and its synonyms) with A. bakkendorfi . This corroborates the recent finding that in females of some Anagrus Haliday species, such as A. (Anagrus) atomus (L.), intraspecific variability of the relative length of the ovipositor can be far more pronounced than previously recognized ( Triapitsyn et al. 2020c), so by itself it should not be used as the sole species defining feature.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Anagrus (Anagrus) bakkendorfi Soyka, 1946
Triapitsyn, Serguei V., Baquero, Enrique & Rugman-Jones, Paul F. 2021 |
Anagrus (Anagrus) bakkendorfi:
Triapitsyn, S. V. & Koponen, M. & Vikberg, V. & Varkonyi, G. 2020: 568 |
Triapitsyn, S. V. 2015: 12 |
Triapitsyn, S. V. & Berezovskiy, V. V. 2004: 29 |
Anagrus avalae: Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 120–124
Chiappini, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. 1999: 124 |
Anagrus bakkendorfi: Chiappini & Triapitsyn 1999: 121
Chiappini, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. 1999: 121 |
Anagrus oregonensis
Chiappini, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. 1999: 120 |
Chiappini, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. & Donev, A. 1996: 578 |
Girault, A. A. 1915: 276 |
Smits van Burgst, C. A. L. 1914: 127 |
Anagrus (Anagrus) avalae: Chiappini 1989: 108
Triapitsyn, S. V. & Adachi-Hagimori, T. & Rugman-Jones, P. F. & Kado, N. & Sawamura, N. & Narai, Y. 2020: 141 |
Triapitsyn, S. V. & Koponen, M. & Vikberg, V. & Varkonyi, G. 2020: 568 |
Triapitsyn, S. V. & Rugman-Jones, P. F. & Tretiakov, P. S. & Luft Albarracin, E. & Moya-Raygoza, G. & Querino, R. B. 2019: 89 |
Triapitsyn, S. V. 2015: 12 |
Triapitsyn, S. V. & Berezovskiy, V. V. 2004: 24 |
Triapitsyn, S. V. 2001: 282 |
Chiappini, E. 1989: 108 |
Anagrus nigriceps:
Burks, B. D. 1979: 1023 |
Anagrus incarnatus ssp. fuscus Boţoc 1963: 99
Triapitsyn, S. V. & Berezovskiy, V. V. 2004: 29 |
Botoc, M. 1963: 99 |
Anagrus latipennis
Chiappini, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. 1999: 121 |
Chiappini, E. 1989: 107 |
Chiappini, E. 1989: 106 |
Soyka, W. 1956: 24 |
Anagrus avalae Soyka 1956: 24
Chiappini, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. 1999: 120 |
Chiappini, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. 1999: 120 |
Chiappini, E. 1989: 108 |
Soyka, W. 1956: 24 |
Girault, A. A. 1915: 276 |
Smits van Burgst, C. A. L. 1914: 127 |
Anagrus arcuatus
Chiappini, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. 1999: 121 |
Chiappini, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. 1999: 120 |
Chiappini, E. 1989: 108 |
Soyka, W. 1956: 24 |
Anagrus valkenburgensis
Chiappini, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. 1999: 121 |
Chiappini, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. 1999: 120 |
Chiappini, E. 1989: 107 |
Soyka, W. 1956: 24 |
Anagrus diversicornis
Chiappini, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. 1999: 121 |
Chiappini, E. 1989: 108 |
Chiappini, E. 1989: 108 |
Soyka, W. 1956: 24 |
Anagrus bakkendorfi
Chiappini, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. 1999: 121 |
Soyka, W. 1946: 40 |
Girault, A. A. 1915: 276 |
Smits van Burgst, C. A. L. 1914: 127 |
Anagrus armatus var. nigriceps
Chiappini, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. & Donev, A. 1996: 578 |
Chiappini, E. & Triapitsyn, S. V. & Donev, A. 1996: 578 |
Girault, A. A. 1915: 276 |