Caecidotea villalobosi, García-Vázquez & Pedraza-Lara & Rodríguez-Almaraz, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4965.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:29559454-295F-45DE-A5EC-133E6B14F751 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4742751 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AF87AA-9D7E-922F-FF31-11BFFDA4F9C8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Caecidotea villalobosi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Caecidotea villalobosi View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs 18–21 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 View FIGURE 20 View FIGURE 21 )
Material examined: Holotype, male ( CNCR 35506 ), length 11 mm; Lago de Catemaco , Coyame, 18°26’12”N, 95°01’27”W, elev. 359 m, Municipality Catemaco, Veracruz, Mexico, 2 November 2017, coll. L. García-Vázquez and C. Pedraza-Lara. GoogleMaps
Paratypes, male ( CNCR 35507 ), length 10.0 mm; same data of collection and collectors as holotype; dissected parts pereiopod I, pereiopod IV, pleopod II; dissected structures for right pleopod drawings I, III, IV and V in the specimen tube. GoogleMaps 2 males and 3 females ( CNCR 35508 , CNCR 35509 ), Laguna Mahahual, 18°39’36”N, 95°18’30W, Municipality San Andrés Tuxtla, Veracruz, Mexico, coll. J. L. Villalobos, E. Moreno and I. Toledano. GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. Male body 3.2 times longer than wide. Head width 1.4 length, anterior margin concave, lateral margins straight; eyes width 2.1 length, postmandibular lobes not produced; Pereiopod I with dactylus inner edge serrated; dactylus pereiopod IV serrated.
Description. Male (CNCR 35506) 11 mm ( Fig. 18A View FIGURE 18 ); head trapezoidal, head width 1.4 length, anterior margin concave. Eyes present, oval, dark pigmented, width 2.1 length. Postmandibular lobes not produced. Subrectangular pereionites, lateral margins with setae.
Pereionite 1 length 0.9 pereionite 2 length; pereionite 1 1.1 pereionite 3 length; pereionites 6–7 with oval margins; posterior widening.
Antennula flagellum with 9 articles, longer than distal antenna podomere middle; last four segments with aestetascs with formula 1–0–1–0. Antenna flagellum with 57 articles with pectinate setae; proximal article longer than wide; following articles decreasing in length.
Pereiopod I ( Figs 18B View FIGURE 18 , 19A–B View FIGURE 19 ) dactylus with robust seta on dactylus, inner edge serrated; proximal process with 3 robust setae; acute mesial process not exceeding dactylus width, bicuspid distal process. Pereiopods II– III ( Figs 18C–D View FIGURE 18 ) similar length. Pereiopod IV ( Figs 18E View FIGURE 18 , 19C–D View FIGURE 19 ), propodus with robust finger-like projection in dactylus, dactylus length 0.9 propodus length, dactylus serrated. Pereiopod V ( Fig. 18F View FIGURE 18 ) length basis 1.4 propodus length, dactylus curved hooked. Pereiopod VI ( Fig. 18G View FIGURE 18 ) smaller than pereiopod VII, basis length 1.3 propodus length, dactylus with spine on lower margin. Pereiopod VII ( Fig. 18H View FIGURE 18 ) length 0.4 body length.
Pleopod I ( Fig. 20A View FIGURE 20 ) length 1.1 pleopod II length; basal segment oval, proximal margin straight, length 1.3 width, internal margin with 3 retinacula, distal segment oval, outer margin curved in apical portion, length 1.8 width, margins with 12 simple setae.
Pleopod II ( Fig. 21A–F View FIGURE 21 ), protopod subsquare, inner proximal edge straight, with simple short distal seta, dorsal distal edge with cuticular scales; exopod base with spine on right distal border, exopod oval, with rows cuticular scales, distal margin with 15–19 long plumose setae; slender endopod, as long as 3.5 width, exopod length 0.7 protopod length; inner surface curved; internal and external processes prominent, apex with 3 terminal processes: caudal process rounded, cannula short subcylindrical, with a circular apex; mesial process present; endopod subapical portion armed with 14–16 cuticular scales.
Pleopod III ( Fig. 20B View FIGURE 20 ), exopod oval with distal margin setose, length 1.2 endopod length, width 1.9 endopod width, transverse suture in proximal half, 21 marginal plumose setae, external margin with 8 simple setae; endopod oval, 1.2 exopod length.
Pleopod IV ( Fig. 20C View FIGURE 20 ), exopod length 1.5 width, external margin with 4 proximal setae, endopod length 1.1 exopod length.
Pleopod V ( Fig. 20D View FIGURE 20 ), exopod oval, exopod length 1.9 width; external margin with 4 simple setae; transverse suture not evident; endopod notched on outer proximal edge, endopod width 1.2 exopod width.
Pleotelson ( Fig. 20E View FIGURE 20 ), subsquare, width 1.1 length, lateral margins parallel, with simple setae, caudomedial lobe produced subacute.
Uropods ( Fig. 20F View FIGURE 20 ), length 0.7 pleotelson length, armed with robust setae; endopod and exopod lanceolate, endopod length 1.0 exopod length, exopod length 1.1 protopod length.
Habitat. The Caecidotea villalobosi sp. nov. specimens were collected on the shore of Catemaco Lake, below rocks submerged in water, as well as on the roots of the water lily Eichornia crassipes . It is important to mention that this species is not abundant in the region.
Distribution. Known from the type locality and Laguna Mahahual, San Andrés Tuxtla, Veracruz.
Etymology. This species is named after Dr. José Luis Villalobos Hiriart for being an exemplary mentor for the first author and for being an exceptional carcinologist, as well as his contributions to the knowledge of Mexican crustaceans.
Remarks. Argano (1977) reported C. communis ( Say, 1818) in the Catemaco lake in similar conditions where we collected Caecidotea villalobosi sp. nov., between the roots of a water lily and under submerged rocks on the shore of the lake. Argano mentioned that C. communis has a wide distribution in Mexico and also takes up Bowman’s (1975) hypothesis about an artificial introduction to Mexico due to human action. However, morphological comparisons with the species C. communis sensu Williams (1970) , allow it to be clearly distinguished by the following characters: rounded head, anterior margin concave; pleotelson in C. communis is subcircular, as long as wide; caudomedial lobe obtuse produced; pleopod I wider and subrectangular, with 24 simple setae in distal margin, while Caecidotea villalobosi sp. nov. has 12 simple setae. The number of retinacula is 5 in C. communis while Caecidotea villalobosi sp. nov. has 3 retinacula; Regarding the apical elements of the pleopod II endopod, the cannula of C. communis is thin, simple, and elongated, surpassing the distal edge of the caudal process, which lacks cuticular scales. The cannula of Caecidotea villalobosi sp. nov. is short, subcylindrical, does not reach the distal edge of the caudal process and has cuticular scales.
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |