Hexophthalma Karsch, 1879
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2018.424 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2A452A63-0B25-4110-B9E1-61A69CD0E7FB |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5985178 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AF87DA-FFD8-D530-FDED-8CF8FABA9A52 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Hexophthalma Karsch, 1879 |
| status |
|
Genus Hexophthalma Karsch, 1879 View in CoL View at ENA
Key to the species of Hexophthalma View in CoL
1. Females ............................................................................................................................................. 2
– Males ................................................................................................................................................. 9
2. Enlarged dorsal setae on femora raised on a slight mound and scoop-shaped ( Fig. 23 View Figs 17–23. 17–22 ); female spermathecae consist of numerous tubes, each ending in one or more spherical vesicles ( Fig. 16 View Figs 9–16 ) .. ................................................................................................................ H. spatulata ( Pocock, 1900) View in CoL
– Enlarged dorsal setae on femora not raised on a slight mound and not scoop-shaped; spermathecae consist of one or more finger-like tubes ( Figs 1–15 View Figs 1–8 View Figs 9–16 ) ........................................................................ 3
3. Inner spermathecae consist of one main finger-like tube on each side ( Fig. 10 View Figs 9–16 ) ................................ .................................................................................................. H. dolichocephala ( Lawrence, 1928) View in CoL
– Inner spermathecae consist of more than one finger-like tube on each side ..................................... 4
4. Spermathecae without outer spermathecae near uterus externus and without reduced outer spermathecae ( Fig. 9 View Figs 9–16 ) ..................................................................... H. damarensis ( Lawrence, 1928) View in CoL
– Spermathecae with outer spermathecae near uterus externus or with reduced outer spermathecae ... ........................................................................................................................................................... 5
5. Spermathecae with outer spermathecae near uterus externus ........................................................... 6
– Spermathecae with reduced outer spermathecae .............................................................................. 7
6. Inner spermathecae with long finger-like tubes ( Figs 6–8 View Figs 1–8 ) ............... H. albospinosa ( Purcell, 1908) View in CoL
– Inner spermathecae with shorter, more bulbous, finger-like tubes ( Figs 11–15 View Figs 9–16 ) ................................ ...................................................................................................................... S. hahni ( Karsch, 1878) View in CoL
7. Inner spermathecae hammer-like, bent slightly laterally ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–8 ) ..................... H. binfordae View in CoL sp. nov.
– Inner spermathecae not hammer-like, bent more or less medially ................................................... 8
8. Inner spermathecae with two finger-like tubes, outer spermathecae relatively round ( Fig. 5 View Figs 1–8 ) ........... .................................................................................................................................. H. leroyi View in CoL sp. nov.
– Inner spermathecae with three or more finger-like tubes, outer spermathecae long ( Figs 2–4 View Figs 1–8 ) ......... ............................................................................................................... H. goanikontesensis View in CoL sp. nov.
9. Embolus with a broad, blunt apex ( Fig. 22 View Figs 17–23. 17–22 ) .......................................... H. spatulata ( Pocock, 1900) View in CoL
– Embolus with a narrow apex ( Figs 17–21 View Figs 17–23. 17–22 ) ..................................................................................... 10
10. Embolus with a short, flattened apex ( Fig. 20 View Figs 17–23. 17–22 ) ........................ H. dolichocephala ( Lawrence, 1928) View in CoL
– Embolus with a thin, sharp apex ......................................................................................................11
11. Broader, basal part of embolus straight-edged ( Figs 18, 21 View Figs 17–23. 17–22 ) .......................................................... 12
– Broader, basal part of embolus with a hump along one edge ( Figs 17, 19 View Figs 17–23. 17–22 ) .................................... 13
12. Thin apical part of embolus almost as long as thicker basal part ( Fig. 17 View Figs 17–23. 17–22 ) ........................................ ............................................................................................................ H. albospinosa ( Purcell, 1908) View in CoL
– Thin apical part of embolus much shorter than thicker basal part ( Fig. 21 View Figs 17–23. 17–22 ) ....................................... ...................................................................................................................... H. hahni ( Karsch, 1878) View in CoL
13. Thin apical part of embolus without embolus keel at base ( Fig. 19 View Figs 17–23. 17–22 ) .................................................. ........................................................................................................ H. damarensis ( Lawrence, 1928) View in CoL
– Thin apical part of embolus with embolus keel at base ( Fig. 18 View Figs 17–23. 17–22 ) ......... H. goanikontesensis View in CoL sp. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.