Anastatus orientalis Yang & Choi, 2015

Yang, Zhong-Qi, Choi, Wan-Yuong, Cao, Liang-Ming, Wang, Xiao-Yi & Hou, Zheng-Rong, 2015, A new species of Anastatus (Hymenoptera: Eulpelmidae) from China, parasitizing eggs of Lycorma delicatula (Homoptera: Fulgoridae), Zoological Systematics 40 (3), pp. 290-302 : 292-300

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11865/zs.20150305

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6FC2F793-9CDA-46A0-8717-037403BB8988

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B087CC-FFC0-AD78-42C6-FD9BFD15FA42

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Anastatus orientalis Yang & Choi
status

sp. nov.

Anastatus orientalis Yang & Choi , sp. nov. ( Figs 1–24 View Figs 1–4 View Figs 5–9 View Figs 10–15 View Figs 16–20 View Figs 21–24 )

Female ( Figs 1–2 View Figs 1–4 , 5–10, 12–13 View Figs 5–9 View Figs 10–15 , 16–20 View Figs 16–20 ). Length 3.2–3.3 mm. Head brown with metallic purple luster, but occipt and gena with peacock-green luster; setae of head whitish; antenna dark brown except both scape and pedicel brown, as well as clava micropilose area brown basally and whitish apically; pronotum testaceous with lateral corner black and having purple

© Zoological Systematics, 40(3): 290–302 luster; mesoscutum, scutellum and axillae dark brassy with greenish luster except posterior 1/3 of mid lobe of mesoscutum blue-green and shining; forewing dark fumose with veins testaceous and setae black-brown, having two cross hyaline bands with white setae, in which one is behind distal 2/3 of submarginal vein with brown setae at lower 2/5, and the other behind distal 1/2 of marginal vein with a V-like shape, the apex of forewing subhyaline; lateral panel of pronotum and prepectus testaceous; acropleuron with anterior 1/4 having purple luster and posterior 3/4 having green brassy luster; legs with coxae testaceous except hind coxa with the same color as acropleuron, other leg segments dark-testaceous but with femora and tibiae dark brown dorsally; prosternum with dark-green luster and mesosternum concolores as acropleuron; metasoma dark-brown with slight metallic purple luster except tergite 1 which with basal 1/4 brown and gradually becoming whitish towards apex and with posterior 2/5 whitish; syntergum and exposed ovipositor sheath yellowish white.

Head in dorsal view with breadth 2.0 times length; temple 0.34 times eye length; OOL: POL: LOL = 3: 10: 7; vertex evenly and slightly convex, coriaceous with dense setae and gradually downward to occipt without occiptal carina; occipt slightly in-curved medially. In front view ( Fig. 5 View Figs 5–9 ), head 1.2 times as wide as high; antennal toruli medially at lower margin © Zoological Systematics, 40(3): 290–302 line of eyes; scrobal depression deep with margin carinated as an inverted V-like in shape with the distance of its dorsal margin to anterior ocellus about the same as the ocellus diameter; interantennal region convex; frons with the shortest distance between eyes 1.5 times that between toruli; eyes bare and with inner orbits divergent downwards considerably; toruli separated each other by twice of its transverse diameter, and with the distance to inner orbit 1.5 times its transverse diameter; the distance between lower margin of toruli and apex of clypeus 0.56 times that between upper margin of toruli and anterior ocellus; malar sulcus distinct and outcurved a little, 0.49 times eye length; frons and face coriaceous-reticulate with relative dense setae, but the setae on face and interantennal region elongate-lanceolate and porrect ( Fig. 5 View Figs 5–9 ); bottom of scrobal depression with transverse striation; clypeus with anterior margin sub-truncate; mandible bidentate with upper tooth dolabriform. Antenna ( Fig. 10 View Figs 10–15 ) with scape slightly compressed and curved, reached over vertex a little; pedicel plus flagellum 1.6 times head breadth; pedicel short and 1.7 times as long as wide; pedicel and flagellar segments covered with dense brown setae, and flagellar segments clavated and with longitudinal sensillae which are brown and not distinct on each segment; clava with very short setae dorsally and a large micropolose area ventrally, as well as with a row of visible longitudinal sensilla on each segment; the relative length of pedicel, Fl 1-8 and clava: 31: 12: 49: 50: 52: 42: 40: 36: 30: 98, their relative breadth:19: 16: 19: 21: 25: 28: 30: 31: 33: 35; clava segments compacted and separated each other by oblique sutures and apical one conical.

Pronotum ( Figs 1–2 View Figs 1–4 , 6–8 View Figs 5–9 ) is below mesoscutum with shape subtrianglar and not distinctly differentiated collar and neck, its breadth 3.8 times median length and 0.8 times mesoscutum; hind corner slightly constricted; along with lateral margin convex as ridge-like; disc concave, smooth, bare and with a longitudinal median suture; its sub-corner bulged, dark with about five bristle-like setae on it. Mesoscutum ( Figs 1 View Figs 1–4 , 6–7 View Figs 5–9 ) 1.16 times as wide as long and 0.9 times as wide as head and 1.16 times as wide as long; notauli deep, convergent as V-like and meeting at posterior 7/10 medially; sub-lateral margins deep-grooved and thus forming the lateral margin flange film-like; the anterior margin slightly out-curved and the hind margin truncate; closing to hind margin with a notable cross ridge and its anterior area inclined forwardly as a slope to meet V-liked posterior notauli, its lateral borders limited by carinae ( Fig. 7 View Figs 5–9 ). However, in the naturally dried specimens, the area behind the met notauli gradually and evenly raised to the truncate hind margin of mesoscutum with a sub-quadrate form ( Fig. 6 View Figs 5–9 ). Midlobe of mesoscutum sub-triangular and convex; lateral lobes bulged longitudinally and carinated shortly near

© Zoological Systematics, 40(3): 290–302 posterior margin; the midlobe with neat, isodiametric and piliferous reticulation; the lateral lobes with transverse coriaceous reticulation and dense long-laceolate white setae. Scutellum and axillae compacted with scutoscutellar suture deep. Scutellum ( Figs 6–7 View Figs 5–9 ) pear-like, convex remarkably, 1.3 times as long as wide with length 0.65 times mesoscutum, with neat piliferously punctured reticulation as on midlobe of mesoscutum, but arranged approximately concentric circle; axillae with about the same sized reticulation as scutellum but running out-downwardly; scutellum with six pairs of brown bristle-like setae along lateral margins and two pairs of them sub-laterally; axillae with three to five setae; hind margin of scutellum abruptly declined in about right-angle. Dorsellum below scutellum directly with crescentic form, slightly convex and sub-smooth, bare and shining with length medially 0.14 times scutellum, and about the same level with lateral panel of metanotum which is in triangular form and rugose. Propodeum with posterior margin arched considerably and contiguously to anterior margin, and bow tie-like ( Figs 6–7 View Figs 5–9 ); collar region raised forming two peaks: one is at inner side of spiracle with the direction posterior-laterally and the other is behind the former with the direction posterior-medially; plical region is at the slopes of the two peaks and the median bottom; the distance between spiracle and anterior propodeal margin is about the spiracle minimal diameter; along lateral margin with long white setae; propodeum dorsally smooth and shining. Forewing ( Fig. 12 View Figs 10–15 ) 2.6 times as long as wide and extending beyond apex of metasoma ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1–4 ); the vein relative length of the submarginal, the parastigmal, the marginal, the postmarginal and the stigmal as: 52: 18: 72: 30: 10; submarginal vein with about 11 long setae; the upper side of costal cell bare but on under side with a complete line of setae and having more setae at both its proximal and distal parts; basal cell with proximal 1/4 bare and distal 3/4 with dense setae; stigma in shape of foot-like. Hind wing ( Fig. 13 View Figs 10–15 ) 3.2 times as long as wide and about 0.78 times as long as forewing. In lateral view, prepectus bare and with frontal prepectal surface smooth and lateral prepectal surface sub-smooth having very weak engraved reticulation ( Fig. 8 View Figs 5–9 ). The very large acropleuron ( Fig. 8 View Figs 5–9 ) with anterior 1/3 coriacous and covered with white porrect and lanceolate setae, and posterior 2/3 neatly strigose as concentric circle and bare ( Figs 2 View Figs 1–4 , 8 View Figs 5–9 ); acropleuron sulcus present at posterior 2/3 along lateroventral side, straight and the anterior part upwards slightly. Fore leg ( Fig. 16 View Figs 16–20 ) with one protibial apical spicule along the dorsoapical margin, and the femur with three lines of brown setae at posterior 1/3 of outer side. Mid leg ( Figs 17–18 View Figs 16–20 ) with tibia widened towards apex with four to six pegs arranging in two lines and with a distinct oblique mesotibial apical groove; the mid tarsus segment 1–4 with two lines conspicuous pegs along each ventrolateral margins ( Figs 17–18 View Figs 16–20 ), the number and status of the pegs on each tarsus segment as Table 1 below.

The very developed mid tibial spur as long as basitarsus; mid femur and tibia compressed remarkably and tibia 1.1 times as long as femur. Hind leg ( Fig. 19 View Figs 16–20 ) with coxa weak coriaceous reticulate and dense long-laceolate setae on whole dorsal surface, tibia only with one apical spur, femur slightly curved and 0.9 times tibia, tarsus as long as tibia. In ventral view, prosternum sub-rhomboid, coriaceous and covered with white setae; mesoventral plate convex evenly, coriaceous reticulate with sparse white setae and a median longitudinal sulcus ( Fig. 9 View Figs 5–9 ).

Metasoma ( Fig. 20 View Figs 16–20 ) widened towards the apex with tergite 5 the widest and 2.35 times as wide as the basal of tergite 1, as wide as mesoscutum and 0.8 times as wide as head; tergite 1 scalariform and is the longest with length 0.37 times the whole gaster, its surface sub-smooth and bare dorsally with sparse setae basal-laterally; the other tergites with fine coriaceous reticulation; tergite 2–4 only with setae laterally and tergite 5 and 6 with dense erect setae dorsally and laterally; last tergite conical; cercus with four bristles, in which three of them long with same length and one only about 1/3 as long as the other three. Ovipositor slightly protruded.

Male ( Figs 3–4 View Figs 1–4 , 11, 14–15 View Figs 10–15 , 21–24 View Figs 21–24 ). Length 2.2–2.4 mm. Body green with metallic luster, but vertex, mesoscutum, scutellum and gaster with dark red-coppery luster; antenna with scape yellow, pedicel, flagellum 1, 2 and sometimes 3 testaceous, flagellum 4 to clava gradually brown to black, flagellum with dense longitudinal sensellae which are dark-brown; legs with coxae concolored with body and other segments yellow; wings hyaline with veins testaceous and setae on disc brown. Head rugulose and vertex with rugose transversely. In dorsal view, head 1.6 times as wide as long; POL: OOL: LOL = 18: 5: 8; temple 0.33 times eye length; vertex slightly and evenly convex; occipt in-curved a little medially. In front view,

© Zoological Systematics, 40(3): 290–302 head 1.3 times as wide as high; eyes sparsely pilose (at 160X magnification); oral part wide and 0.45 times head width; lower margin of toruli at lower ocular line; inner orbits divergent downwards; scrobal depression distinct and campanulate with dorsal apex to lower margin of anterior ocellus 0.7 times the ocellar longitudinal diameter; malar sulcus deep with length 0.63 times eye height; interantennal area convex as a small longitudinal process which extended to face medially; anterior margin of clypeus truncate; upper frons and vertex with normal setae but lower frons and face covered white dense porrect long-lanceolate setae. Antenna ( Figs 4 View Figs 1–4 , 11 View Figs 10–15 ) with scape moderately compressed and elliptical, convex dorsally and flat ventrally, about 2.3 times as long as wide, extending to reach vertex; pedicel sub-globose and as long as wide; each flagellum segment with dense brown longitudinal sensillae and dense short setae; the flagellum compressed more or less from funicle 2 with clava even flattened; funicle 1 robust, curved moderately with length 3.5 times its width and nearly as long as scape (35: 33), 6.0 times pedicel, and with basal width 1.25 times the pedicel; the relative length of scape, pedicel, funicle 1–7 and clava as: 50: 8: 48: 36: 38: 32: 24: 22: 17: 56; clava with a micropilose area at apex 3/5 ventrally.

Mesosoma ( Fig. 21 View Figs 21–24 ) with mesoscutum and scutellum convex considerably and rugulose. Pronotum short directly below mesoscutum, steeply sloped forwards and not differenciated collar and neck. Mesoscutum 1.75 times as wide as long with width 0.78 times head, notauli deep and convergent posteriorly, dorsum covered with dense brown short setae. Scutellum covered with dense brown erected setae, 1.4 times as long as wide and 1.25 times as long as mesoscutum; axillae conspicuously developed; the anterior margin of scutellum only 0.35 times as wide as the width of hind margin of mesoscutum midlobe. Dorsellum small behind scutellum and corialate, and the lateral panel of metanotum sub-smooth. Propodeum 0.26 times medially as long as scutellum, smooth and shining; median carina distinct; hind margin conspicuously arched medially; plical depression present at posterior 3/5; the median panel convex; callus along lateral margin with about 12 setae. Forewing ( Figs 3 View Figs 1–4 , 14 View Figs 10–15 ) 2.1 times as long as wide; the relative vein length of the submarginal, the marginal, the post-marginal and the stigmal as: 180: 95: 58: 35; costal cell bare on dorsal side and densely setose on ventral side; basal cell setose; speculum narrow and beyond it densely setose. Hind wing ( Figs 3 View Figs 1–4 , 15 View Figs 10–15 ) 0.76 times as long as forewing. In lateral view, prepectus sub-triangular and the surface distinctly reticulate ( Fig. 22 View Figs 21–24 ); acropleuron, anterior 1/3 and posterior 1/6 of mesopleuron smooth, shining and bare; mesopleuron with cross coriaceous strigose, and with a longitudinal ridge ventrolaterally at posterior 1/2, as well as with sparse setae ventrally. Metapleuron sub-triangular, shining, bare and located at upper posterior corner of mesopleuron, thus, their posterior margins about at the same vertical line and hind coxa directly above the mid coxa. Fore and hind coxae coriaceous reticulate, mid coxa smooth. Fore coxa setose, fore tibia with two apical spiculi along dorsoapical margin ( Fig. 24 View Figs 21–24 ). Mid tibia with one apical spur which is as long as basitarsus ( Fig. 24 View Figs 21–24 ); mid coxa bare and small. Hind coxa bare but distal 1/3 of ventral surface setose, the tibia with two apical spurs in which one is twice as long as the other.

Metasoma ( Fig. 23 View Figs 21–24 ) with petiole narrow and arched conspicuously. Gaster widened towards apex with shape tranpiziform and apex slightly out-curved, 1.75 times as long as wide with the widest (tergite 5) 3.4 times the basal of tergite 1; the length about the same as mesosoma (66: 68), the width 0.92 times mesosoma and 0.8 times head respectively; dorsum slightly sunken; each tergite with hind margin truncate; tergite 1 and 2 bare and tergite 3–7 with sparse setae; tergite 1 smooth and shining laterally and coriaceous reticulate medially; from tergite 2 to last tergite with very weak engraved coriaceous reticulate. Because the gaster of male weakly sclerotized the metasoma often is tortuous in natural dried specimens, and their shape may change. The description above should be referred.

Diagnosis. The new species belongs to subgenus Anastatus (Anastatus) and close to both A. japonicus Ashmead, 1904 and A. bifasciatus (Geoffroy, 1875) which are in the same subgenus with the new species, but can be separated by the key below.

1. The distance between anterior ocellus and apex of scrobes 1.8 times to twice the longitudinal diameter of the ocellus; length of pedicel plus flagellum less than 1.45 times head breadth; length of funicle 2 less than 3.3 times funicle 1; clava over 1.13 times as long as preceding three funicles combined ..................................................................... 2

The distance between anterior ocellus and apex of scrobes about 1.0 times the longitudinal diameter of the ocellus; length of pedicel plus flagellum 1.6 times head breadth; funicle 2 with length 4.08 times funicle 1; clava 1.0 times as long as preceding three funicles combined ............................................................ A. orientalis Yang & Choi , sp. nov. 2. The distance between anterior ocellus and apex of scrobes twice the longitudinal diameter of the ocellus; length of pedicel plus flagellum 1.36 times head breadth; funicle 2 with length 2.75 times funicle 1; clava 1.33 times as long as preceding three funicles combined and its apex acuminated........................................................ A. bifasciatus (Geoffroy)

The distance between anterior ocellus and apex of scrobes 1.8 times the longitudinal diameter of the ocellus; length of pedicel plus flagellum 1.45 times head breadth; funicle 2 with length 3.3 times funicle 1; clava 1.13 times as long as preceding three funicles combined and its apex blunt............................................................... A. japonicus Ashmead

© Zoological Systematics, 40(3): 290–302

© Zoological Systematics, 40(3): 290–302

Material examined. Holotype ♀, Fragrant Hill, Haidian District , Beijing, Zhong-Qi Yang and Zheng-Rong Hou, collected the egg masses of Lycorma delicatula (White) on 6 April 2011 and the parasitoid wasp emerged on 10 May 2011. Paratypes: 50♀, 30♂, same data as holotype; 22♀, 17♂, the campus of Chinese Academy of Forestry, Haidian District , Beijing, collected the egg masses of L. delicatula on 10 April 2001 , the parasitoid wasp emerged on 1 May 2001; 133♀, 67♂, the campus of the Northwestern Forestry College, Yangling, Shaanxi, Zhong-Qi Yang , collected the egg masses of L. delicatula on 21 April 1984 , the parasitoid wasp emerged on 7 May 1984; 40♀, 30♂, Yangling, Shaanxi, Cong Wei and

© Zoological Systematics, 40(3): 290–302 Zhong-Qi Yang , collected the egg masses of L. delicatula on 8 April 2011 , the parasitoid wasp emerged on 1–18 May 2011; 66♀, 45♂, Qinhuangdao, Hebei, Zhong-Qi Yang and Xiu-Rong Qiao , collected the egg masses of L. delicatula on 18 April 2011 , the parasitoid wasp emerged on 6 May 2011; 26♀, 20♂, Zhifu, Yantai, Shandong, Chuan-Zhen Wang and Zhong-Qi Yang , collected the egg masses of L. delicatula on 15 April 2011 , the parasitoid wasp emerged on 21 May 2011; 56♀, 50♂, same data as the previous materials, but the parasitoid wasp emerged on 10 September 2011; 6♀, 5♂ , Guangang Forest Park, Tianjin City, Zhong-Qi Yang and Xiao-Yi Wang , collected the egg masses of L. delicatula on 20 April 2011 , the parasitoid wasp emerged on 2 May 2011.

Distribution. China (Shaaxi, Hebei, Beijing, Tianjin, Shandong), South Korea (Cheongwon-gun, Chungcheongbuk-do (36°38'N, 127°29'E )). The species may eventually be found throughout China where the host L. delicatula occurs. Kim et al.

© Zoological Systematics, 40(3): 290–302 (2011) reported an egg parasitoid, Anastatus sp. , reared from L. delicatula . From their description and photos of the species, it should be the present new species.

Etymology. The species epithet is derived from the areas where it was discovered.

Biological observations. A. orientalis Yang & Choi , sp. nov. is a solitary endo-parasitoid of eggs of L. delicatula ( Figs 25–26 View Figs 25–28 ). In early April of 2011, we collected total 450 egg masses of the spotted lantern-fly from the five areas mentioned in materials and methods above and reared in lab, finally 137 egg masses were found to be parasitized by A. orintalis with the parasitism rate of egg masses 30.4% and the sex ratio of female to male was 1.9: 1.0, Then the individual egg parasitism rate was calculated and it was 40.2%. It is easy to recognize the parasitized and non-parasitized host eggs: the former with an emerged hole which is subround ( Figs 25-A, 26-A View Figs 25–28 ), and the latter with a nymph-hatched hole which is long elliptical with an egg lid attached to egg shell ( Figs 25-C, 26-B View Figs 25–28 ). Hou (2013) reported that A. orientalis had an egg parasitism rate from 20% to 90% with average 44%. Choi et al. (2014) reported their investigation results of natural parasitism of A. orientalis on eggs of the pest too.

The host of the parasitoid, the spotted lantern fly, has one generation a year and overwinters as egg stage, and its egg-laying period is from the final ten days of August to the final ten days of October in northern China (Xiao, 1992; Hou, 2013). During the investigation in 2011, we found that A. orientalis adults had two emergence groups a year within the same egg mass: some individuals in May and others in September. The Spring (mostly in May) emerged group could parasitize the host eggs which were not parasitized in last Autumn, and the group emerged in September could parasitize the host eggs of the new generation. The interesting phenomenon shows that it may be the best strategy for the parasitoid to maintain its population, and the parasitoid has a high host specificity appearing as an uni-host parasitoid. It may not need alternative hosts to succeed its generations and could only develop in the eggs of L. delicatula .

We also conducted the experiment for mass-rearing the parasitoid with a selected substitute host eggs. It was found that A. orientalis could complete 7–8 generations from April to December in a year under laboratory conditions. It took 18–28 d for one generation development with temperature about 25℃ and humidity about 65±5%. Under the room temperature 23–25℃, the developmental duration of eggs is 1–2 days, 10 days for larvae, 4 days for prepupae and 7 days for pupa stage. The female could survive 100 days with feeding honey dew and one female could produce eggs minimum 64 and maximum 98 ( Hou, 2013).

From the investigations and the mass rearing experiment conducted by us it is indicated that the new species has a high potential as a superior biological control agent for suppression of L. delicatula .

Acknowledgements We particularly thank Dr. Gary Gibson (Canadian National Collection of Insects, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada) for help in taxonomy of the parasitoid and sending the senior author materials of Anastatus japonica and A. bifasciatus during he studied in November 2002 in Canadian National Collection of Insects. Thanks are also due to Mr. Chuan-Zhen Wang (Yantai Station of Forest Pest Management, Shandong Province), Mrs. Xiu-Rong Qiao (Qinhuangdao Station of Forest Pest Management, Hebei Province) and Prof. Cong Wei (Northwest A & F University) for their help in collection the eggs of L. delicatula .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Eupelmidae

Genus

Anastatus

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF