Goloboffia griswoldi, Ferretti & Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4712.2.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:185A7E45-F88F-40E4-BEB7-5C1C3DF9A63B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5932007 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/79302A0F-5C1B-4B29-9FFE-6F9C91DCA7B9 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:79302A0F-5C1B-4B29-9FFE-6F9C91DCA7B9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Goloboffia griswoldi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Goloboffia griswoldi View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs 1–9 View FIGURES 1–3 View FIGURES 4–9 , 71 View FIGURE 71 )
Type material. Holotype: ♀, MACN-Ar 36129, Chile, Región de Coquimbo (IV), Playa Agua dulce, 46 km north of Los Vilos (collected in a ravine), 5-6.xi.1988, P. Goloboff leg. Paratype: 1 ♀, MACN-Ar36129, same collection data .
Additional material examined. 1 ♀ and 16 juveniles, MACN-Ar 36129, Chile, Región de Coquimbo (IV), Playa Agua dulce, 46 km north of Los Vilos (collected in a ravine), 5-6.xi.1988, P. Goloboff leg. ; 1 ♀, MACN-Ar 36117, Chile, Región de Coquimbo (IV), Playa Agua dulce, 46 km north of Los Vilos , 5-6.xi.1988, P. Goloboff leg.
Etymology. The specific epithet is a patronym in honor of the U.S. arachnologist Charles Griswold, in recognition of his fundamental contributions to spider systematics, including works on the migid fauna.
Diagnosis. Females of Goloboffia griswoldi sp. nov. differ from females of the other known species by the narrower ocular quadrangle occupying less than half of the width carapace (about 0.45 of width) ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–3 , 4 View FIGURES 4–9 ) in combination with the spermathecae having ducts as long as spermathecal head width, and lobes rounded and pointing outwards ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 4–9 ).
Description. Female holotype (MACN-Ar 36129). Coloration (in alcohol): Carapace, legs and chelicerae reddish brown ( Figs 1, 3 View FIGURES 1–3 ), abdomen grayish. Total length 13.26; carapace 5.15 long, 4.57 wide. Fovea deep, straight with recurved ends, 1.04 wide. Ocular group 1.89 wide, occupying 0.44 of cephalic width ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–3 , 4 View FIGURES 4–9 ). Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.16, PME 0.19, ALE 0.49, PLE 0.14, AME–AME 0.19, AME–ALE 0.33, PLE–PME 0.11, PME–PME 0.91. Labium 0.93 long, 0.84 wide, with 12 cuspules ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 4–9 ). Labium separated from sternum by shallow groove. Maxillae with 15/12 (right/left) cuspules ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 4–9 ). Fangs keeled and chelicerae with subequal teeth, 4 promarginal and 4 retromarginal, and 19 denticles between margins. Sternum elongated, 2.4 long, 2.49 wide. Posterior sigillae deep, large and airfoil shaped ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–3 ). Leg formula 4123, tibiae and metatarsi I and II flattened, with very long spines ( Figs 6–7 View FIGURES 4–9 ). Segment lengths (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus, total): I: 2.82, 1.53, 1.91, 1.51, 0.77, 8.54. II: 2.4, 1.65, 2.15, 1.10, 0.59, 7.89. III: 2.75, 1.43, 1.59, 1.28, 0.68, 7.73. IV: 3.36, 1.94, 2.38, 2.35, 1.23, 11.26. Palp: 1.65, 0.96, 1.1, –, 1.02, 4.73. Spines: Femur: Palp and legs I – IV, 0. Patella: Palp: 1 – 1p; I: 1p; II: 1p; III: 25p; IV: 62d. Tibia: Palp: 1p, 1 – 1r; I: 7p, 12r; II: 5p, 8r; III: 13p; IV: 0. Metatarsus: I: 7p, 8r; II: 6p, 5r; III: ventral comb of 26 large and 28 small spines ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 4–9 ); IV: ventral comb of 25 large and 15 small spines. Tarsus: Palp: 3p, 3r; I: 5p, 8r, 16v; II: 6p, 11r, 19v; III: 38v (stronger toward distal end); IV: 0. Spermathecae with long ducts (as long as spermathecal head width) with a well-developed constriction between ducts and receptacles, which are rounded and pointed outwards ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 4–9 ).
Male. Unknown.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality ( Fig. 71 View FIGURE 71 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |