Limois sordida, Wang & Constant & Qin, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.720.1113 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:36EEBC1B-2355-43D9-B844-F321DD1E7D24 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4330010 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4B5CE928-5341-4712-9B98-3F5DF7AA7F37 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:4B5CE928-5341-4712-9B98-3F5DF7AA7F37 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Limois sordida |
status |
sp. nov. |
Limois sordida View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:4B5CE928-5341-4712-9B98-3F5DF7AA7F37
Figs 6–7 View Fig View Fig , 15 View Fig A–D
Diagnosis
(1) Frons with 3 longitudinal carinae ( Fig. 6E View Fig ); (2) tegmina with along irregular stripe, sinuately extending to anal angle ( Fig. 6 View Fig A–C); (3) gonostyli almost equilateral in lateral view; (4) hindwings pale yellow in basal ⅖, medially without fascia ( Fig. 6 View Fig A–B).
Etymology
The specific epithet alludes to the sordid color of the clypeus.
Type material
Holotype
CHINA • Ƌ; Shanxi, Ningwu, Mt. Luyashan ; 25 Oct. 2011; Ai-ping Dong leg.; NWAFU.
Paratypes
CHINA • 4 ƋƋ, 2 ♀♀; same data as holotype; NWAFU • 2 ♀♀; Beijing, Mt. Baihuashan, Huang Tuo village ; 9 Sep. 1960; Fa-sheng Li leg.; CAU • 1 Ƌ; Beijing, Mt. Baihuashan, Huang Tuo village ; 7 Sep. 1960; Ji-kun Yang leg.; CAU • 1 Ƌ; Beijing, Mt. Baihuashan ; 5 Sep. 1961; Fa-sheng Li leg.; CAU • 1 Ƌ; Hebei, Mt. Xiaowutaishan ; 3 Aug. 2011; Jian Yao leg.; IZCAS IOZ(E)2058877 • 1 Ƌ; Hebei, Mt. Xiaowutaishan ; 4 Aug. 2011; Jian Yao leg.; IZCAS IOZ(E)2058878 • 1 ♀; Hebei, Mt. Xiaowutaishan ; 3 Aug. 2011; Jian Yao leg.; IZCAS IOZ(E)2058876 .
Description
MEASUREMENTS. Body length: ♀ 10.6–11.4 mm; Ƌ 9.2–10.2 mm. Wingspan: ♀ 35.7–36.5 mm; Ƌ 31.5– 32.7 mm.
HEAD. Including eyes distinctly narrower than pronotum (about 1: 1.7) ( Fig. 6D View Fig ). Vertex quadrangular, about 2 times as broad as an eye, lateral and posterior margins carinate, median carina obscure; cephalic process flattened, not reaching posterior margin of vertex ( Fig. 6D, F View Fig ). Frons medially with 3 longitudinal carinae, the median carina tinier, all not reaching fronto-clypeal suture; clypeus sordid, narrower and shorter than frons, labium elongate, reaching the end of abdomen, median carina on clypeus ( Fig. 6E View Fig ).
THORAX. Thorax macular covered with numerous dark spots, pronotum about 1.6 times as long as vertex in dorsal view, with one longitudinal broken band on each side of median carina, black ( Fig. 6D View Fig ); mesonotum with 3 pairs of dark patches along anterior margin and one dark triangular patch on each lateral area ( Fig. 6D View Fig ).
TEGMINA. Brownish yellow on basal ⅖ and costal area, with narrow irregular stripe from costal area, extending to anal angle; remaining area of tegmina hyaline with some dark markings, veins ochre brown, about 2.7 times as long as maximum broad ( Fig. 6 View Fig A–C).
HINDWINGS. Pale yellow on basal ⅖, with 4–5 black spots arranged in one oblique row, apical ⅗ of hindwings hyaline with a brown band along suture margin ( Fig. 6 View Fig A–B).
LEG. Brown with black rings and stripes. Metatibiae with 5–8 lateral and 6–7 apical spines.
ABDOMEN. Tergites black, posterior margin ochre yellow on each segment ( Fig. 6A View Fig ).
MALE GENITALIA. Pygofer in profile with ventral margin straight, laterocaudal margin slightly convex ( Figs 7A View Fig , 15A View Fig ). Anal tube moderate, in lateral aspect reaching level of end of genital plates, ventral margin slightly concave in basal ¾, apical margin truncate, intersecting with dorsal margin at obtuse angle, epiproct right-angled apically, paraproct slender in dorsal view ( Figs 7 View Fig A–B, 15A). Gonostyli subtriangular in lateral view, rounded apically, apical margin straight in middle, in ventral view plates connected in basal ⅕ ( Figs 7A, C View Fig , 15 View Fig A–B). Aedeagus reduced, membranous endosoma with a dorsal pair of lobes surrounding a ventral pair of lobes and the sclerotized endosomal processes; the endosomal processes sclerotized over entire length, about 4.0 times as long as sheath, apical ½ exposed and terminally inflated ( Fig. 7 View Fig C–E, 15C–D). Connective rod-like. Tectiductus large, in lateral view subrectangular, in dorsal view broad, apically rounded and distinctly concave medially ( Figs 7 View Fig C–E, 15A).
Distribution
China (Shanxi; Hebei, Beijing).
Remarks
Limois sordida sp. nov. is similar to L. bifasciatus , L. emelianovi and L. kikuchii , but differs from L. bifasciatus by the frons having three longitudinal carinae ( Fig. 6E View Fig ) (with two longitudinal carina in L. bifasciatus ); from L. emelianovi and L. kikuchii it differs by the irregular stripe on tegmina long, sinuately extending to anal angle ( Fig. 6 View Fig A–C) (irregular stripe short and straight, not extending to anal angle in L. emelianovi and L. kikuchii ). Furthermore, it differs from L. kikuchii by the gonostyli being almost equilateral in lateral view ( Figs 7A View Fig , 15 View Fig A–B) (elongate in L. kikuchii ); from L. emelianovi it differs from the basal ⅖ of hindwings pale yellow in both sexes, medially without fascia ( Fig. 6 View Fig A–B) (base of hindwings yellow in male but red in female and medially with a blackish brown fascia in L. emelianovi ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |