Smicromorpha Girault, 1913
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4991.1.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5D3EAF68-04AE-4C86-B3BF-84379724CB3C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5092095 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B12113-BD1A-FFE3-FF33-FF0B26B3FEC7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Smicromorpha Girault, 1913 |
status |
|
Smicromorpha Girault, 1913 View in CoL View at ENA
Smicromorpha Girault 1913: 89 View in CoL . Type species: Smicromorpha doddi Girault View in CoL , by original designation and monotypy. Smicromorphella Girault 1930: 2 . Type species: Smicromorphella minera Girault , by monotypy (synonymy by Naumann
1986).
Description. Body non-metallic yellow to orange with brown or black markings. Head with eyes usually very large, in profile occupying majority of face (e.g. Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–9 ) except in S. banksi ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16–22 ), S. minera ( Naumann 1986, fig. 38), and S. eudela ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 32–38 ); margin of antennal scrobe deeply impressed and carinate (e.g. Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–9 ) except in S. eudela ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 32–38 ); toruli at level with or above ventral margin of eyes (e.g. Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23–31 ). Mandibles asymmetric, right mandible with inner rounded lobe and acute sclerotized tooth, and left mandible with inner, stout, acute tooth and outer weakly sclerotized process. Antenna with scape translucent, pedicel swollen, and flagellum much shorter than length of eye in profile, slender and somewhat fusiform, with 5 (♂)‒6(♀) flagellomeres, and mostly bearing sparse, suberect, hair-like setae; clava (terminal flagellomere) not differentiated, 1-segmented (e.g. Fig. 26 View FIGURES 23–31 ) except 2-segmented in S. attenboroughi sp. nov. ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–9 ). Mesosoma with pronotum dorsally transverse, with or without transverse carina dorsally; mesoscutum with complete but narrow and weakly impressed notauli; prepectus minute, hardly visible; propodeum rugose-punc- tate, with petiolar foramen at dorsal margin. Hind coxa quite slender, subequal in length to hind femur; hind femur greatly enlarged, most often ventral margin serrulate without an inner tooth (e.g. Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10–15 ). Wings densely setose; MV short, at most as long as STV; PMV absent or reduced to a stub; STV divergent from costal margin (e.g. Fig. 11 View FIGURES 10–15 ). Metasoma elongate; base of petiole with dorsal condyle providing articulation with propodeum ( Figs 31 View FIGURES 23–31 , 56 View FIGURES 52–57 ); body of petiole delimited anteriorly by ventrobasal and dorsobasal laminae; postpetiolar segments unsclerotized.
Hosts. Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius) ( Hymenoptera : Formicidae ) ( Girault 1913; Naumann 1986; Darling 2009). African species possibly parasitizing African weaver ant species Oecophylla longinoda (Latreille) ( Naumann 1986) .
Distribution. Afrotropical, Australia, India, Indonesia and Vietnam ( Girault 1913, 1915, 1930; Narendran 1979; Naumann 1986; Bouček 1988, Ubaidillah & Kojima, 2004; Darling 2009; Noyes 2019; R. Copeland, pers. comm.) ( Fig. 62 View FIGURE 62 ).
Key to world species. Naumann (1986) & Darling (2009).
Key to Species of Smicromorpha Girault View in CoL of the world (modified from Naumann 1986 & Darling 2009)
1. LOD shorter than OOL ( Figs 18 View FIGURES 16–22 , 35 View FIGURES 32–38 , 40, 42 View FIGURES 39–45 , 48 View FIGURES 46–51 , 55 View FIGURES 52–57 ); hind femur with or without basal prominence.................... 2
- LOD much greater than OOL (lateral ocellus adjacent to inner eye margin) ( Figs 5 View FIGURES 1–9 , 27 View FIGURES 23–31 ); hind femur with basal prominence fol- lowed by serrulation ( Figs 10 View FIGURES 10–15 , 23 View FIGURES 23–31 )........................................................................ 3
2. Margin of antennal scrobe carinate ( Figs 17 View FIGURES 16–22 , 44 View FIGURES 39–45 , 47 View FIGURES 46–51 , 53 View FIGURES 52–57 ); STV at right angle with SMV ( Figs 19 View FIGURES 16–22 , 41 View FIGURES 39–45 , 50 View FIGURES 46–51 ); hind femur with dis- tinct, black serrulation ( Figs 20 View FIGURES 16–22 , 39, 41 View FIGURES 39–45 , 46 View FIGURES 46–51 , 52 View FIGURES 52–57 )............................................................. 4
- Male. Margin of antennal scrobe acarinate ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 32–38 ); fore wing with STV punctiform, forming acute angle with SMV; hind femur without black serrulation, with 3 or 4 pale coloured distal teeth [ Australia: Northern Territory]... S. eudela Naumann View in CoL
3. Flagellum 8-segmented, the clava 2-segmented ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–9 ); pronotal collar with transverse carina throughout, including dorsum ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–9 ); LOD 1.53× POL ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–9 ); head in frontal view 1.40× as long as wide ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–9 ); IOD 5.10× maximum length of head; anterior 0.4× of petiole smooth ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 10–15 ) [ India: Kerala]............................ S. attenboroughi Binoy , sp. nov.
- Flagellum 7-segmented, the clava (terminal flagellomere) 1-segmented ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 23–31 ); pronotal collar carinate only laterally ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 23–31 ); LOD 1.40× POL ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 23–31 ); head in frontal view 1.12× as long as wide; IOD 1.63× maximum length of head; petiole mi- nutely reticulate-punctate to rugose dorsally ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 23–31 ) [ Australia: North Territory, PNG and Queensland]... S. doddi Girault View in CoL
4. Hind femur with blunt process proximally ( Figs 39, 41 View FIGURES 39–45 ) or terminal flagellomere wider than long; hind femur with short, dense and adpressed setation................................................................................. 5
- Hind femur without any basal prominence proximal to serrulation, and terminal flagellomere longer than wide; hind femur with long, sparse, suberect setae and with short, dense and adpressed setae ( Naumann 1986, fig. 37) [ Australia: Queensland]......................................................................................... S. minera Girault
5. Sternaulus absent ( Naumann 1986, fig. 47); OS greater than LOD ( Figs 17 View FIGURES 16–22 , 47 View FIGURES 46–51 , 53 View FIGURES 52–57 ); frons with distinct longitudinal grove be- tween median ocellus and antennal scrobe ( Figs 47 View FIGURES 46–51 , 53 View FIGURES 52–57 )...................................................... 6
- Sternaulus present ( Naumann 1986, fig. 49; Fig. 43 View FIGURES 39–45 ); OS equal to LOD ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 39–45 ); frons without distinct longitudinal grove between median ocellus and antennal scrobe [ India: Kerala, Tamil Nadu]..................... S. keralensis Narendran View in CoL
6. Female. Petiole distinctly swollen ventrally, less than 3.7× as long as high, and with transverse lamina indistinct ( Figs 46 View FIGURES 46–51 , 56 View FIGURES 52–57 ); terminal flagellomere longer than wide; fl 1 less than 0.7× as long as fl 2........................................... 7
- Female. Petiole not distinctly swollen ventrally, more than 4.0× as long as high, and with transverse lamina distinct ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 16–22 ); terminal flagellomere wider than long; fl 1 0.8× as long as fl 2 [ Australia: Queensland; Papua New Guinea: Karkar Island]........................................................................................ S. banksi Naumann View in CoL
7. Petiole with strong basal dorsolateral carinae ( Darling 2009, fig. 10); tentorial pits absent [ Australia: Queensland]........................................................................................... S. lagynos Naumann View in CoL
- Petiole without dorsolateral carinae ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 52–57 ); tentorial pits distinct [ Vietnam: Thua Thien-Hue Province].................................................................................................... S. masneri Darling
OS |
Oregon State University |
LOD |
Lódz University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Smicromorpha Girault, 1913
Binoy, C., Santhosh, S. & Nasser, M. 2021 |
Smicromorpha
Girault, A. A. 1930: 2 |
Girault, A. A. 1913: 89 |