Phalacrostemma danieli, Chávez-López, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.831.1873 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5DC33033-8588-463F-9AAE-2BC49560BE1D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6885906 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B2EE18-FFF3-FFAA-263C-714EEB6302A5 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Phalacrostemma danieli |
status |
sp. nov. |
Phalacrostemma danieli View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:8255C32E-0216-4353-A681-3A5E42915E88
Figs 5– 7 View Fig View Fig View Fig , 8E, G–J View Fig
Diagnosis
Outer paleae with pectinate margins on distal thecae, hirsute tips. Inner paleae cylindrical with conspicuous thecae, slightly expanded margins, and blunt tip. Tentacular filaments absent.
Etymology
This species name is after my brother Daniel Chávez-López. It is a noun in the genitive case ( ICZN 1999, Art. 31.1.2).
Material examined
Holotype LESSER ANTILLES • incomplete spec. (body length 10 mm); southwest of Grenada; RV Pillsbury , stn 478; 11°33′ N, 62°09′ W; depth 597 m; 2 Aug. 1966; UMML-22.1179 . GoogleMaps
Paratypes LESSER ANTILLES • 9 specs; same collection data as for holotype; UMML-22.1180 GoogleMaps • 1 spec. (using mid-operculum for SEM); same collection data as for holotype; UMML-22.1181 GoogleMaps • 1 spec.; same collection data as for holotype; ECOSUR-304 GoogleMaps .
Additional material
BAHAMAS – Southeastern Bahamas • 4 specs; RV Columbus Iselin , stn 163; 23°37′ N, 77°13′ W; depth 1342 m; 6 Feb. 1974; UMML-22.1182 GoogleMaps • 1 spec.; same collection data as for preceding; ECOSUR-P3236 GoogleMaps .
Description
BODY. Holotype incomplete (UMML-22.1179), 10 mm long, 2.5 mm wide, six abdominal segments, caudal peduncle 3.5 mm long ( Fig. 5 View Fig ).
OPERCULUM. Opercular disc truncate. Outer paleae arranged spirally, 29–30 paleae on each lobe. Inner paleae arranged diagonally, two paleae on right lobe, one palea on left. Outer paleae amber, cylindrical, 2.5 mm long ( Figs 6A–E View Fig , 7C–F View Fig ). Proximal region with compact thecae, margins slightly expanded, denticulate ( Figs 6B View Fig , 7C–D View Fig ). Thecae of middle region with margins expanded, denticulate ( Figs 6C View Fig , 7E View Fig ). Thecae of mid-distal region with margins expanded, pectinate ( Figs 6D View Fig , 7F View Fig ); tips hirsute ( Figs 6F View Fig , 7E View Fig ). Inner paleae amber, cylindrical, with conspicuous thecae, slightly expanded margins; tips blunt, smooth ( Figs 6F–G View Fig , 7G View Fig ). Opercular stalk brown, slightly wider than long ( Fig. 5A–D View Fig ). Opercular papillae in one row peripheral to outer paleae; nine papillae on each lobe. Papillae conical and tapered, 5–6 times as long as wide ( Fig. 5C View Fig ). First papilla appears in dorsal region of opercular peduncle, at level of nuchal hooks ( Fig. 5F View Fig ). Four pairs of amber nuchal hooks, compressed, tip slightly curved, with long limbation. Limbation exceeds curvature of hook tip, 2.5 times as long as tip ( Figs 6H View Fig , 7B View Fig ). Palps robust, tapered, twice as long as wide ( Figs 5C–D View Fig , 7A View Fig ). Pair of broad buccal flaps ( Fig. 5D View Fig ). Tentacular filaments absent. Median organ conical, tapered without eyespots.
THORAX. First thoracic segment with two long, triangular-shaped lateral lobes and capillary neurochaetae ( Fig. 5C–D View Fig ). Second segment with 2–3 triangular-shaped lateral lobes and paired branchiae, without chaetae ( Fig. 5C View Fig ).
PARATHORAX. With four segments, all with paired branchiae. Notopodia with six lanceolate chaetae and six capillary chaetae ( Fig. 6I View Fig ). Neurochaetae capillary.
ABDOMEN. Abdominal segments brownish with paired branchiae up to segment 4. Neurochaetae capillary, ornamented with irregular thecal laminar extensions ( Fig. 6J View Fig ). Notopodia with series of uncini with 10 rows of teeth ( Fig. 6K View Fig ). Caudal peduncle cylindrical, brownish, broken, only posterior region attached to abdomen ( Fig. 5B, E View Fig ).
Variation
Body incomplete 4–10 mm long, 0.5–2 mm wide, 3–6 abdominal segments. Operculum with 16–30 outer paleae per lobe, 1–3 inner paleae per lobe, generally two pairs, and 3–5 pairs of nuchal hooks. Outer paleae 1–2.5 mm long.
Remarks
Phalacrostemma danieli sp. nov. shares the morphology of the outer paleae with P. paulinae Kirtley, 1994 , and the morphology of the abdominal uncini with P. tenera ( Augener, 1906) .
Phalacrostemma paulinae Kirtley, 1994 was described from the Northwestern Atlantic Ocean ( Kirtley 1994: 38 °41′ N, 70°38′ W), from a single specimen collected by RV Atlantis II , stn 95 at 2160 m depth. Its original description is brief and only included a partial description of the outer palea, so it is necessary to redescribe P. paulinae to know the rest of the characters.
According to Kirtley (1994: 162), the type material of P. paulinae was in the Natural History Museum, Los Angeles (NHM) without a specific catalog number. During his stay at NHM (Feb.–Mar. 2022) Dr Sergio Salazar-Vallejo, along with the polychaete collection manager Leslie H. Harris, searched for the type material of P. paulinae and found the holotype vial with catalog number LACM-AHF POLY 1691 ( Fig. 8A View Fig ). Unfortunately, the vial was empty, which means the holotype is missing, and there are no other specimens from nearby localities or the same oceanographic expedition in the museum.
In P. paulinae the outer paleae have the proximal thecae with denticulate and slightly expanded margins ( Fig. 8B View Fig ); thecae of the middle region with expanded pectinate margins ( Fig. 8C View Fig ), and the mid-distal thecae with expanded elongate and pectinate margins ( Fig. 8D View Fig ). The morphology of the outer paleae of P. danieli ( Fig. 8G–I View Fig ) resembles that of P. paulinae ; although there are some differences in the denticles of the mid-distal thecae. Phalacrostemma danieli sp. nov. has straight denticles, 5–9 times as long as wide ( Fig. 8I View Fig ), whereas P. paulinae has slightly inclined denticles, 10–16 times as long as wide ( Fig. 8D View Fig ).
Another difference is the locality and bathymetric range where the species were found. According to Kirtley (1994: 162), P. paulinae was collected in the North Atlantic (38°41′ N, 70°38′ W) at 2160 m depth; however, the vial label contains different coordinates (38°33′ N, 68°32′ W) and depth (3753 m) ( Fig. 8A View Fig ), even though both refer to the same station and oceanographic cruise: RV Atlantis , stn Atl. 95. Based on the above, P. paulinae could be distributed from 38°41′ N, 70°38′ W to 38°33′ N, 68°32′ W at 2160 m or 3753 m depth, while P. danieli sp. nov. was collected in the Lesser Antilles (11°33′ N, 62°09′ W) at 597 m depth and the Bahamas (23°37′ N, 77°13′ W) at 1342 m.
Phalacrostemma tenera ( Augener, 1906) was described from Barbados at 365.8 m depth. Phalacrostemma danieli sp. nov. shares the abdominal uncini with a curved dorsal region and 10 rows of teeth ( Fig. 8J View Fig ) with P. tenera ( Fig. 8K View Fig ). Although these species are distributed at similar depths at relatively close localities, they differ mainly in the shape of the nuchal hooks. Phalacrostemma tenera has a short, slightly falcate tip, at a 57° angle, and a slightly wider limbation than the tip ( Fig. 8F View Fig ), whereas P. danieli sp. nov. has a curved tip, at a 45° angle, and a wider tip than the limbation ( Fig. 8E View Fig ).
The lack of detail mainly in the morphology of the opercular paleae of P. tenera and P. paulinae prevents the determination of their diagnostic characters and therefore hinders their comparison with the other species of the genus. In addition, the type material of P. tenera ( Kirtley 1994: 165) and P. paulinae (Salazar-Vallejo 2022 pers. com.) is missing. Therefore, topotype material is necessary.
Based on the morphological differences found and considering the area of distribution and bathymetric ranges, I assigned the analyzed specimens to P. danieli sp. nov.
Distribution
Southwest of Grenada Island at 597 m depth ( Fig. 22 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |