Nemophora tanakai Hirowatari, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5348.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0E2E659D-1490-4E0B-B198-D08FC7CC5394 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B33D1F-FF87-9105-FF10-FE7F74842F38 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nemophora tanakai Hirowatari, 2007 |
status |
|
(54) Nemophora tanakai Hirowatari, 2007
(Plates VI-4, XVII-4, XXVI-2)
Nemophora tanakai Hirowatari, 2007: 29 , figs. 2A–B, 3A–B, 4, 5C–D, 8, 9 (TL: Vietnam, Vinh Phu Prov., Tam Dao; OPU, BMNH); Wang & Kishida 2011: 6, pl. 70, fig. 19 ( China, Guangdong, Nanling); Wang et al. 2020: 2, pl. 3 ( China, Guangdong, Shimentai).
Diagnosis. This species can be distinguished by the following combined characters: 1) pair of forewing central fasciae not connected in middle; 2) subapical yellow area of forewing with distinctly wide black frame; 3) tegula bronzy with metallic blue scales distally; 4) compound eyes of male relatively large and eye size index about 2.6; 5) apex of valva blunt and posterior margin of vinculum without membranous window area in male genitalia.
Specimens examined. [Hunan] 1♁, Mangshan National Nature Reserve, Yizhang County, Chenzhou City , 2020.V.10, C.Q. Liao & M. Deng leg. ; [Guangdong] 1♁, Nanling National Nature Reserve (1,050 m), Ruyuan Yao Autonomous County, Shaoguan City , 2005.VI.13, G.H. Huang, M. Wang & L.S. Chen leg. ; [Yunnan] 1♀, Qinglongxia (1,800 m), Kunming City , 2017.VI.18–19, G.H. Huang & M. Wang leg. ; [ Taiwan] 1♁, Anmashan (2,500 m), Taizhong City , 1997.VII.28, Y.Arita leg. ( HUNAU) ; 3♁, Kaohsiung, Hsien, Liukwei, Taouang , Tengchih , (ca. 1,600 m), 1999.VII.30, Y. Arita leg. ( OPU) .
Distribution. China (Hunan, Guangdong, Yunnan, Taiwan); Vietnam.
Remarks. This species was described by Hirowatari (2007) in Vietnam, and has been reported in Guangdong, China ( Wang & Kishida 2011; Wang et al. 2020). In this paper, we obtained additional specimens and more geographical information, which widely expanded its distribution ranges. This species, to a considerable extent, seems to have a sympatric distribution with N.fluorites and usually occurs simultaneously based on Hirowatari (2007) and our observations. Hirowatari (2007) observed this species nectaring on flowers of the probable Castanopsis sclerophylla (Fagaceae) and actively flying over the flowers together with N. fluorites during the daytime.
One DNA barcode of N. tanakai is generated, and this sequence is closest to N. fluorites (pairwise distances: 0.038).
3.13 Nemophora bifasciatella species group
Nemophora mediseorsa group (Sun & Li 2023: 485)
Diagnosis. This species group is characterized by the following characters: the very small body size, wing expanse of 10–15 mm; the eyes are very small, widely separated dorsally, with eye size index of 0.44–0.58; the forewing has a pair of black-margined bluish-leaden transverse central fasciae, which are separated by a yellowish to the brown band; the basal part of the sacculus is almost completely fused; and the apical part of the aedeagus has a slender keel dorsally. In addition, unlike most other adelid moths, the basal part of the female antenna of this species group is prominently slender without densely raised thick scales.
Remarks. Nemophora bifasciatella Issiki, 1930 was originally described in Japan. Based on the examination of types deposited in NMNH (Washington) and other more specimens, Hirowatari (1995) redescribed N. bifasciatella with descriptions of two other new related species from Japan, namely N. sylvatica and N. stellata . Recently, Sun & Li (2023) described four new species, namely N. mediseorsa , N. longiuga , N. longissima , and N. mediangusa , and established the mediseorsa species group. We consider that at least N. bifasciatella and N. sylvatica are closely related to the species described by Sun & Li (2023) though they did not refert to this point. Therefore, in the present study, we treat these species as the bifasciatella group, because N. bifasciatella is the oldest species in this group. Recently, Kozlov (2023c) reported the distribution of N. mediseorsa in India and described a new species, namely N. manipurella , which obviously belongs to this species group. Here, we redescribe two species of them, N. longiuga and N. longissima , and roport N. bifasciatella from China for the first time.
Key to species of the bifasciatella View in CoL group based on external morphology
1 Forewing without basal black speckle, outer fascia narrowed medially............................... .. N. mediangusa View in CoL
- Forewing with basal black speckle, outer fascia separated medially.............................................. 2
2 A pair of bluish-leaden transverse central fasciae both consecutive, near X-shaped; apical yellow scales area nearly round or oval..................................................................................... N. bifasciatella View in CoL
- The outer bluish-leaden transverse central fascia usually separated at middle, near K-shaped; apical yellow scales radial.... 3
3 Forewing distinctly slender, length/width ratio about 4.2; basal 1/5 of forewing with a slightly wavy white transverse line.. 4
- Forewing relatively short, length/width ratio about 3.6; basal 1/5 of forewing without white transverse line...... N. longiuga View in CoL
4 Apical part of forewing with six yellow radial stripes............................................... N. mediseorsa View in CoL
- Apical part of forewing with four yellow radial stripes.............................................. N. longissima View in CoL
Key to species of the bifasciatella View in CoL group based on male genitalia
1 Vinculum extremely long and slender, about 4.6 times as long as valva; aedeagus with a very long and slender keel dorsally extending from middle of aedeagus............................................................. N. longissima View in CoL - Vinculum moderate in length, 2.9–3.3 times as long as valva; aedeagus with a short keel at apical 1/6 dorsally........... 2 2 Costa of valva extending a nearly rectangular lobe basally; apex of aedeagus with many large spines dorsally.... N. longiuga View in CoL - Costa of valva without additional lobe basally; apex of aedeagus without distinct spines............................. 3 3 Phallus with hook-shaped process at distal 1/8; Vinculum distinctly short, about 2.2 × length of valva....... N. mediangusa View in CoL
Phallus without hook-shaped process at distal 1/8; vinculum relatively slender, more than 2.5 × length of valva........... 4 4 Phallus with a short rod at subbasal area of suprazonal sheath....................................... N. bifasciatella View in CoL - Phallus with belt of spines from near 2/5 to 1/9.................................................... N. mediseorsa View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Nemophora tanakai Hirowatari, 2007
Liao, Cheng-Qing, Hirowatari, Toshiya, Yagi, Sadahisa, Wang, Min, Wang, Xing & Huang, Guo-Hua 2023 |
Nemophora tanakai
Wang, H. S. & Chen, S. Y. & Dai, K. Y. 2020: 2 |
Wang, M. & Kishida, Y. 2011: 6 |
Hirowatari, T. 2007: 29 |