Hyalopeplus similis Poppius, 1912
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4378.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C197FDFA-09A1-4238-8094-AB69F8BE2130 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5968019 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B387CB-FFF5-CF4E-FF1A-FC5361ADF832 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hyalopeplus similis Poppius, 1912 |
status |
|
Hyalopeplus similis Poppius, 1912 View in CoL
( Figs. 21–33 View FIGURES 21–33 , 34–39 View FIGURES 34–39 )
Hyalopeplus similis Poppius, 1912: 8 View in CoL (as new species). Hyalopeplus similis: Pathak 1969: 38 View in CoL , 39 (citation from India in PhD, under the junior synonyms H. horvathi View in CoL and H. krishna View in CoL ); Carvalho & Gross 1979: 508 – 511, 512, 513, 514, 515 (redescription, male genitalia, lectotype designation, synonymies); Schuh 1995: 680 (catalogue); Zheng et al. 2005: 50 (redescription, in fauna); Schuh 2002 – 2013 (online catalogue); Chérot et al. 2017: 86 –87, plate 11, Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5–8 (presence in Papua New Guinea, DV, discussion of type locality).
Diagnosis. Middle-sized Hyalopeplus (total length 7.1–9.0 mm, maximal width across hemelytra 1.9–2.3 mm). Globally “yellow to citrine with castaneous and reddish areas” ( Carvalho & Gross, 1979) and glassy hemelytra. Pronotal collar transversally striate, with five longitudinal reddish stripes. Pronotal callosities wide, slightly punctate. Pronotal disk widely and deeply punctate, rugose. Humeral angles almost rounded, not produced. Chromatic pattern very variable. Habitus in dorsal view Figs. 21, 25 and 30 View FIGURES 21–33 . Male genital structures Figs. 22–24, 26–29 and 31–33 View FIGURES 21–33 . Measurements of Indian specimen table 1.
Material examined. INDIA: KARNATAKA: 1♂, 4♀: Hessarghatta, Ex: Mangifera (Anacardiaceae) , 24.vi.2013, Yeshwanth H. M., leg.; 1♂, 1♀: Sirisi, 25.vi.2010, Murthy S. leg; 1♀: Chickmagalur, 6.vi.2007, Nagaraju D. K. leg; 1♀: Belghaum, Castle rock, 26.x.2011, Yeshwanth H.M. leg; 1♀: Mudigere, 6.iv.1980, Viraktamath C. A. leg; 1♂: Dharwad, 28.v.2008, Swamy C. M. K. leg.; 3♂, 4♀: Bangalore, GKVK, Ex: Peltophorum pterocarpum (Fabaceae) , 17.vii.2017,Yeshwanth H. M., leg TAMIL NADU: 2♀: Coimbatore, 13.vi.2015, Yeshwanth H. M. leg.; 1♂, 1♀: Thandigudi, 10.xi.2010, Reddy A. N. leg. SIKKIM: 2♂, 2♀: Gangtok, 12.xi.2013, Shashank leg. TELANGANA: 2♀: Nizamabad, Rudrur, 13.ix.2012, Yeshwanth H. M. leg. (UASB).
Distribution. Widely distributed species, known from Africa ( Congo, Ivoiry Coast, Saõ Tomé, Tanzania) to Pacific Islands (Thaïti) by way of India (Bihar, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Telangana), Japan, south-east Asia and Australia ( Carvalho & Gross 1979; Cassis & Gross 1995; Schuh 1995, 2002–2013), redescribed from Bihar under the junior synonym H. krishna Ballard, 1927 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Hyalopeplini |
Genus |
Hyalopeplus similis Poppius, 1912
Yeshwanth, H. M. & Chérot, F. 2018 |
Hyalopeplus similis
Poppius, 1912 : 8 |
Pathak 1969 : 38 |
Carvalho & Gross 1979 : 508 |
Schuh 1995 : 680 |
Zheng et al. 2005 : 50 |
Chérot et al. 2017 : 86 |