Paragnetina, Klapalek, 1907

Judson, Sarah W. & Nelson, C. Riley, 2012, 3541, Zootaxa 3541, pp. 1-118 : 38

publication ID

505937B0-9F57-4068-82E6-8553826DD5AA

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:505937B0-9F57-4068-82E6-8553826DD5AA

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5258156

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B387E7-1543-8113-FF5A-FC2DFAFD54F3

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Paragnetina
status

 

Paragnetina View in CoL

DIAGNOSIS: Male hemiterga are short, barely covering tergite 9 ( Fig. 225), as compared to Agnetina which extend entirely across tergite 8. The hemitergal processes are abruptly bent at a 90 degree angle ( Fig. 225), whereas those in Kamimuria are straight. The female subgenital plate is deeply notched and bilobed ( Fig. 226), the lobes rounder and longer than Kamimuria which are pointed and short. The nymph lacks anal gills ( Fig. 197) and has an incomplete setal fringe on the posterior margin of sternum 7 ( Fig. 197), similar to Kamimuria but in contrast to Agnetina which has gills and a complete fringe. Head of nymph is distinct, with a pale, oval ocellar spot that is open posteriorly ( Fig. 227), whereas Kamimuria has indistinct pale interocellar markings and Agnetina is entirely dark in the ocellar region.

DISTRIBUTION—Global: Holarctic— Regional: AOB, IDB*— Aimag: BU^, KhG, KhD*, SE, TO^.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Plecoptera

Family

Perlidae

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF