Diura
Judson, Sarah W. & Nelson, C. Riley, 2012, 3541, Zootaxa 3541, pp. 1-118 : 41-42
publication ID |
505937B0-9F57-4068-82E6-8553826DD5AA |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:505937B0-9F57-4068-82E6-8553826DD5AA |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B387E7-154E-811F-FF5A-F9C5FED75109 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Diura |
status |
|
DIAGNOSIS: The tength tergum of male is not deeply cleft and lacks accessory hemitergal processes ( Fig. 269), characters shared with Filchneria ( Fig. 274). The male also lacks an external epiproct, as do Filchneria and Skwala . However, the terminalia are not completely devoid of genitalic structures and have paraprocts which are modified into dorsally or posteriorly directed subanal lobes ( Fig. 265). The female subgenitial plate is broad, extending to cover sternum 9 ( Fig. 270) and is similar to those of Skwala ( Fig. 293). Nymphs have long galea relative to the lacinial teeth ( Fig. 241). General coloration of nymphs ( Fig. 261) is most similar to Arycnopteryx and Skwala , but Diura exhibits a mesosternal ridge pattern with the arms meeting at the posterior corner of the furcal pits ( Fig. 231), whereas those of Arycnopteryx and Skwala meet at the anterior corners.
DISTRIBUTION—Global: Holarctic— Regional: AOB, IDB— Aimag: AR, BO, KhD, KhG, SE*, TO^, UB*, ZA^.
DISCUSSION: Due to morphological and geographical overlap of D. majuscula with the highly similar D. nanseni (not recorded from Mongolia), a complete revision of this genus and especially the Palearctic species, is warranted. Dr. C. H. Nelson (personal communication) is currently investigating species validity with an emphasis on egg morphology.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.