Ophionea (s. str.) ishiii Habu, 1961
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5493.4.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:16BD6CF7-E0FF-4A04-9ADE-C3DFBF92B7DC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13330227 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B3FE71-772A-FFE4-74FD-41B5A864EC45 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ophionea (s. str.) ishiii Habu, 1961 |
status |
|
Ophionea (s. str.) ishiii Habu, 1961 View in CoL
Figure 13 View FIGURES 11–16
Ophionea (Setophionea) ishiii ishiii Habu, 1961: 118 View in CoL . Loc. Typ.: Nago, Okinawa Island, Loochoos.
Ophionea (Setophionea) ishiii hoashii Habu, 1961: 122 View in CoL . Loc. Typ.: Batuan, Mindanao. syn. nov.
Casnoidea (s. str.) leytensis Baehr, 1996: 1064 View in CoL . Loc. Typ.: Leyte. syn. nov.
Material: 1 ♂, 1 ♀: “ Philippines, Mindanao, Araibo, Pantukan , Compostela valley, 900 m, Candalaga Mts. , 7°16’35.3N, 126°10’12.8E, 15– 20.10.2019, Anichtchenko A. leg.” ( AAc) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂: “ Philippines, Eastern Visayas, Samar, Marabut , June 2015 ” ( DUBC) ; 8 ex: “ Gutalac, Zamboanga del Norte, Mindanao , Dec. 2014 ” ( DUBC) ; 1 ex: “ Panamokan, Bukidnon, Mindanao , Sept. 2014 ” ( DUBC) ; 1 ex: “ Intavas, Bukidnon, Mindanao , Aug. 2014 ” ( DUBC) ; 1 ex: “ Masara, Compostela Valley, Mindanao , Sept. 2014 ” ( DUBC) ; 2 ex: “ Panamokan, Bukidnon, Mindanao , XI.2014 ” ( RSc) ; 1 ex: “ Dominorog, Bukidnon, Mindanao , IX.2019 ” ( RSc) ; 1 ex: “ Gutallac, Zamboanga del Norte, Mindanao , XI.2020 ” ( RSc) ; 1 ex: “ Siocon, Zamboanga del Norte, Mindanao , XII.2019 ” ( RSc) .
Distribution. Japan, Taiwan, Philippines (Leyte, Mindanao, Samar), Indonesia (Java) ( Habu 1961).
Systematic notes: Ophionea ishii and its ssp. hoashii were described by Habu (1961), but with a larger series of specimens, we could not determine a stable difference (length of apical white spot of elytra) between them. Furthermore, Terada and Wu (2014) have shown that in another species of Ophionea there is great variability in the size and position of the posterior elytral spot. Therefore, for these reasons we think that this character lies within intraspecific variability, not allowing to separate two different populations at the subspecific level. We propose the new synonymy Ophionea (Setophionea) ishiii ishiii Habu, 1961 = Ophionea (Setophionea) ishiii hoashii Habu, 1961 junior synonym.
Casnoidea leytensis Baehr, 1996: 1064 View in CoL was described from the Philippines, but Baehr (1996) admitted that he did not directly know O. ishii , and did not even mention the ssp. hoashii View in CoL . We examined the holotype (female) of this species, labelled “ Leyte Visca N Baybay, cultiv. land. 1991, leg. Schawaller et al., 28.ii.1991 ” (SMNS), and compared it with the photographs of the holotype of Ophionea ishiii hoashii Habu, 1962 View in CoL , labelled “III, 14. 1957, Magallanes, Butuan, Mindanao Philippine, N. Hoashi” (NIAES). In Baehr’s (1996) key to the species, the difference should be “Pilosity on prothorax and elytra distinct, whole surface of elytra pilose” in O. leytensis View in CoL vs. “Surface of prothorax and elytra barely pilose, extremely sparse pilosity on elytra present only laterally and apically” in O. hoashii View in CoL . A very recent study by Anagha and Sabu (2024) proposes a new key to the species of Ophionea View in CoL , but the data concerning these taxa are directly taken from Baehr’s study, and do not add any additional data or observation.
In fresh specimens, the hairs on the elytra are clearly visible, especially laterally and in the apical half of elytra; however, these hairs fall very easily and many specimens may appear almost hairless. Furthermore, we observed no differences in aedeagal structures. Therefore, we propose the new synonymy: Ophionea (Setophionea) ishiii ishiii Habu, 1961 View in CoL = Casnoidea (s. str.) leytensis Baehr, 1996 View in CoL junior synonym
Anagha and Sabu (2024) state that O. interstitialis Schmidt-Göbel, 1846 is found in the Philippines; however, in our opinion, this should be referred to O. ishiii . This species and O. interstitialis are indeed very similar and the characters used in the various keys are unstable (we saw specimens of O. ishiii from the Philippines with one seta on interval 5). There is a possibility that these will be synonyms, but in order to make a final decision, it is necessary to study additional material.
Thus, the species shows a relatively wide distribution, including Japan, Taiwan (Terada & Wu 2016), the Philippines and Indonesia (Java).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ophionea (s. str.) ishiii Habu, 1961
Anichtchenko, Alexander & Sciaky, Riccardo 2024 |
Casnoidea (s. str.) leytensis
Baehr, M. 1996: 1064 |
Ophionea (Setophionea) ishiii ishiii
Habu, A. 1961: 118 |
Ophionea (Setophionea) ishiii hoashii
Habu, A. 1961: 122 |