Trichophysetis, Meyrick, 1884: 287
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5174.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FDA769F6-538A-4E07-8166-684850930C16 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7108662 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B48783-FFA6-FF55-FF63-FAB6C1AFFEE1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Trichophysetis |
status |
|
TRICHOPHYSETIS Meyrick, 1884: 287 View in CoL
type species Trichophysetis neophyla Meyrick, 1884 View in CoL
ALPHERAKIA Ragonot, 1890: 520 View in CoL
CALLINAIAS Warren, 1890 View in CoL in Swinhoe: 286
CALLINAIS Warren, 1890 misspelling
CRASIGENES Meyrick, 1894: 476 View in CoL
PURIELLA Strand, 1918: 88 View in CoL
TRICHOPHYRETIS Pagenstecher, 1909 View in CoL misspelling
TRIEROPIS Meyrick, 1886: 218 View in CoL
HENDECASIS: Hampson, 1896: 131 View in CoL (key), 140. syn. n.
NEOHENDECASIS Shibuya, 1931: 168 View in CoL .
A moderately sized genus characterised by the dark band on the hindwings which forms a continuum with the abdomen when specimens are at rest with their abdomen slightly raised. The male genitalia are complex with structures arising from the base of the vinculum. Those whose biology is known feed on Oleaceae .
HENDECASIS was described by Hampson (1896) on the basis of differences in the palpi, but it is clear his description of this genus was based only on a female with “palpi porrect, straight and nearly naked, about three times length of head” which is contrasted with TRICHOPHYSETIS with a description of a male: “palpi porrect, about twice as long as head, and thickly tufted with hair”. He also describes Hendecasis palpi as having maxillary palpi triangularly scaled, quoted also by Shibuya (1931). I have not been able to discern anything that matches that description, here again the distinction appears to be between sexes or differences at specific level. Differences in venation are minor whereas the general plan of the genitalia is consistent among species, hence HENDECASIS is placed in the synonymy of TRICHOPHYSETIS .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Trichophysetis
Agassiz, David 2022 |
NEOHENDECASIS
Shibuya, J. 1931: 168 |
HENDECASIS: Hampson, 1896: 131
Hampson, G. F. 1896: 131 |
CRASIGENES
Meyrick, E. 1894: 476 |
ALPHERAKIA
Ragonot, E. - L. 1890: 520 |
TRIEROPIS
Meyrick, E. 1886: 218 |
TRICHOPHYSETIS
Meyrick, E. 1884: 287 |