Pristomyrmex punctatus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.20362/am.008010 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B50C79-FFB5-FF8C-F8FE-EB55FCBA5F90 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pristomyrmex punctatus |
status |
|
MALE GENITALIA OF PRISTOMYRMEX View in CoL PUNCTATUS
Description
Pygostyle digitiform with 3-8 long setae in its apical third ( Fig. 2 View Figs 2 – 3 ). Abdominal sternite IX subhexagonal in outline ( Fig. 3 View Figs 2 – 3 ); spiculum (anterior apophysis of the sternite IX, Sp in Fig. 3 View Figs 2 – 3 ) short; anterior margins meeting in an obtuse angle basal to the spiculum; anterolateral sternal corners weakly produced anterolaterally; lateral margins slightly concave; posterolateral sternal corners somewhat produced anterolaterally; posteromedian part ventrally with long setae. Genital capsule longer than wide. Cupula wider than long, weakly constricted anteriorly ( Fig. 4 View Fig. 4 ), with its mesoventral part shortened anteroposteriorly as a transverse bridge (the anterior and posterior margins of cupula indicated by black dashed line in Fig. 4 View Fig. 4 ). Telomere distinctly differentiated from basimere by ventral notch (the notch indicated by dashed line in Fig. 5 View Figs 5 – 7 ); oblique carina present on lower of basimere (BmC in Fig. 5 View Figs 5 – 7 ); gonostipital arm (median anteroventral extension of the basimere indicated by red dashed line in Fig. 4 View Fig. 4 and Ga in Fig. 4 View Fig. 4 and 5 View Figs 5 – 7 ) in ventral view almost as long as basal width, with its lateral and mesal margins converging and forming an acute apex; telomere in lateral view almost as long as high, with setae on the outer surface of its posterior part ( Fig. 6 View Figs 5 – 7 ); ventral ridge of volsella with setae ( Fig. 5 View Figs 5 – 7 ); cuspis in lateral view roundly lobate and short, not reaching posterior margin of digitus ( Fig. 7 View Figs 5 – 7 ); digitus in lateral view claw-shaped, entirely hooked ventrad ( Fig. 7 View Figs 5 – 7 ); very short setae with distinct sockets scattered ventrally on digitus. Valviceps in lateral view with posterior apex hooked ventrad, anteroventral corner not produced; ventral margin with 9–13 denticles ( Fig. 8 View Figs 8 – 9 ); foveae (recognized as tunnels running inside valviceps) sparsely present on apical and ventral area of valviceps (some of apical foveae probably with short setae but obscure in optical microscope observation); valvura directed dorsoanterolaterally (Va in Fig. 9 View Figs 8 – 9 ); lateral apodeme produced ventrolaterally (Lp in Fig. 9 View Figs 8 – 9 ), forming wing-like structure which hold basal part of volsella in genital complex; penisvalva membrane densely spinate (Pvm in Fig. 9 View Figs 8 – 9 ).
Remarks
General constitution of formicid male genitalia as shown by previous authors ( Krafchick 1959; Ogata 1987; Ogata 1991) was preserved in irregularly produced males of Pristomyrmex punctatus , and conspicuous deletion, deformation, or ornamentation of the main components was not recognized. Gonostipital arm which was claimed as a synapomorphy of the Myrmicinae by Ogata (1991) is present in the male genitalia of Pristomyrmex punctatus . But this structure is not a synapomorphy of the Myrmicinae because of its presence in other ant subfamilies and in other hymenopteran lineages ( Schulmeister 2003; Boudinot 2013). Based on a comparison of the male genitalia of P. punctatus with those of other myrmicine genera described and illustrated by Ogata (1991), the general features of male genitalia of Myrmicinae can be summarized as follows: (1) cupula wider than long; (2) gonostipital arm present, but variable in shape; (3) digitus strongly curved ventrad (except for Solenopsis japonica : both of digitus and cuspis reduced); (4) cuspis simple and reduced, shorter than digitus and nev- er protruding dorsad above digitus in lateral view, or absent. In order to understand morphological synapomorphies of Myrmicinae in male genitalia, more detailed and comprehensive comparision across taxa is needed.
In agreement with previous observations by Itow et al. (1984), the male genitalia of P. punctatus seem to be functional. Further comparison of the male genitalia between P. punctatus and amphigonic sister species, e.g., members of P. punctatus group (sensu Wang 2003), might provide valuable information for our better understanding of the origin of parthenogenesis in the genus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |