Microtus, Schrank, 1798

Jackson, Donavan J & Cook, Joseph A, 2020, A precarious future for distinctive peripheral populations of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus), Journal of Mammalogy 101 (1), pp. 36-51 : 38

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1093/jmammal/gyz196

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7850828

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B5185B-0B08-7A73-FF0C-F94BFE62FE62

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Microtus
status

 

Microtus View in CoL View at ENA Phylogeny Inferred from Cytochrome b

Sampling and phylogenetic reconstruction.— We inferred the phylogeny of species of Microtus , generally accepting the species designations of Musser and Carleton (2005). Cytochrome b (Cytb) sequences were downloaded for 110 individuals representing 62 species from GenBank (Supplementary Data SD1) with eight newly sequenced individuals (two represent the first sequences for M. breweri ; Supplementary Data SD2) for a total of 118 individuals and 64 species of Microtus , with two outgroup species ( Chionomys robertsi and C. nivalis ). Exceptions to Musser and Carleton (2005) include the formally unrecognized species M. gromovi ( Bannikova et al. 2010) , M. hartingi ( KryŠtufek et al. 2012) , M. atticus (Rovatsos and Giagia-Athanasopoulou 2012) , and two controversial species M. rossiaemeridionalis and M. obscurus ( Jaarola et al. 2004; Bannikova 2010; Tougard et al. 2013; Markova et al. 2014), which we treat as distinct species. In addition, we included a single randomly chosen individual from each of four independent mtDNA lineages identified in M. pennsylvanicus (this study). All sequences were aligned in Geneious v. 8.1.9 ( Kearse et al. 2012) using the MUSCLE ( Edgar 2004) algorithm and phylogenetic reconstruction was carried out in BEAST v1.10.4 ( Suchard et al. 2018) using the best-fit substitution model, GTR+I+G, from jModelTest with a uncorrelated relaxed lognormal clock prior. We used a Coalescent Constant Population tree prior and ran analyses for 40 million generations, sampling every 2,000 generations and excluding a 20% burn-in. Independent runs were assessed in TRACER v1.6.0 ( Rambaut et al. 2014) ensuring effective sample size (ESS) was above 200 for all parameters and that independent runs had converged.

Genetic distance between Microtus species. — Pairwise genetic distance (uncorrected p -distance and Kimura 2-parameter [K2P]) of Cytb sequences (excluding M. pennsylvanicus and its putative sister species M. montanus ) was computed using the program MEGA7 ( Kumar et al. 2016). All individuals were grouped by species if more than one individual was used in analyses and sister relationships were inferred from our Bayesian phylogeny. Mean between-group distance was computed under both uncorrelated p -distance and the K2P model; both were computed by bootstrapping with 1,000 replicates, with pairwise deletions for missing data.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Mammalia

Order

Rodentia

Family

Cricetidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF