Paraphasma trianguliferum ( Redtenbacher, 1906 )

Chiquetto-Machado, Pedro I., Morales, Adriana C. & Cancello, Eliana M., 2022, Taxonomic revision of Paraphasma Redtenbacher, 1906 (Phasmatodea, Pseudophasmatidae) based on phallic and external morphology, Zootaxa 5122 (1), pp. 1-80 : 56-58

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5122.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EC13A69D-D6FA-4926-AC59-648A5626C9B9

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6399562

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B587AA-FFE2-FFF1-FF2A-FF2DFC9DF22B

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Paraphasma trianguliferum ( Redtenbacher, 1906 )
status

 

Paraphasma trianguliferum ( Redtenbacher, 1906) View in CoL

Figs 40–42 View FIGURE 40 View FIGURE 41 View FIGURE 42 , Table 9 View TABLE 9 .

Oestrophora triangulifera Redtenbacher, 1906: 124 View in CoL , pl. V, fig. 2; Chopard, 1911: 339; Chopard, 1920: 167, figs 268, 269; Brock, 1998a: 62; Zompro & Brock, 2003: 25; Zompro, 2004: 102, fig. 53a,b; Otte & Brock, 2005: 231; Jourdan et al., 2014: 494; Delfosse et al., 2019: 229 View Cited Treatment ; Conle et al., 2020: 127. Lectotype (here designated): ♂, Suriname (NHMW) ( Fig. 40 View FIGURE 40 ). Paralectotypes (here designated): 1♀, French Guiana, Cayenne (NHMW) ( Fig. 42 View FIGURE 42 ); 1♂, French Guiana, Cayenne (MNHN); 1♀, Suriname (MHNG).

Paraphasma trianguliferum, Chiquetto-Machado & Cancello, 2021: 23 View in CoL , 26, figs 25, 26.

Diagnosis. Easily distinguishable from other species of Paraphasma by the very short tegmina exhibiting a unique morphology, with distinctly acuminate apical margins and shoulder pads developed into large, triangular, externally directed spines ( Figs 40C View FIGURE 40 , 42C View FIGURE 42 ). Further diagnostic features of P. trianguliferum are the slightly shorter mesothorax in comparison to other species of the genus, the anterior region of the male subgenital plate with a pair of large and conspicuous lateral projections (not covered by the tergite IX as in Paraphasma umbretta ) ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 : arrows), and the relatively homogeneous dark brown body with a distinctly lighter region on the anterior half of the tegmina ( Figs 40 View FIGURE 40 , 41A–C View FIGURE 41 ).

Redescription of male. Color ( Figs 40 View FIGURE 40 , 41 View FIGURE 41 ): Body mostly dark brown. Femora and tibiae dark brown with light brown bands; antennae with similar pattern, but with sparser light bands. Tegmina with anterior half of anal region light brown and posterior half dark brown; light and dark areas separated by a well-defined line extending until apex of tegmina spine. Tergites VIII–X predominantly light brown. Head ( Fig. 40 View FIGURE 40 ): Smooth; subquadrate in dorsal view; vertex very weakly convex. Compound eye very prominent, covering nearly half of head length, almost round in lateral view. Ocelli and antennae as in Paraphasma conspersum . Thorax ( Fig. 40 View FIGURE 40 ): As in Paraphasma conspersum . Legs ( Fig. 40 View FIGURE 40 ): As in Paraphasma conspersum , but profemur slightly shorter than mesothorax, metathorax and median segment combined, and with moderately raised anterodorsal carina. Wings ( Fig. 40 View FIGURE 40 ): Tegmina very short, not reaching median region of metanotum; in dorsal view 2x longer than wide; posterior margin slightly angled, apical margin distinctly acuminate; shoulder pad developed into a large, triangular, somewhat dull spine, externally directed; anal region with conspicuous reticulate venation. Hindwing reaching abdominal tergite VIII. Abdomen ( Figs 40A,B View FIGURE 40 , 41 View FIGURE 41 ): About 1.6x longer than the combined length of head, thorax and median segment; dorsally and ventrally smooth; lacking carinae. Segments gradually shortening from II to VIII. Tergites VIII–X ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 ) distinctly shorter than II–VII; tergites VIII and X similar in length, both shorter than IX; tergite VIII the widest. Tergite X narrowing posteriorly; posterior margin centrally concave; posterolateral corners developed into two swollen regions, under which are located weakly-developed thorn pads formed by less than 10 minute teeth ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 : TP). Cerci ( Fig. 41B,D View FIGURE 41 ) approximately straight and cylindrical but gently tapering towards apex; slightly shorter than tergite X; apex rounded. Vomer ( Fig. 41E View FIGURE 41 ) somewhat slender, with basal and apical expansions narrow and elongate; about as long as wide; distinctly asymmetric, with apex curved to the right. Subgenital plate ( Fig. 41B–D View FIGURE 41 ) at least 2x longer than sternite VIII; distinctly divided into anterior and posterior region. Anterior region of subgenital plate originating a symmetric pair of large and conspicuous lateral projections surpassing posterior margin of tergite IX ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 : arrows); lateral projections approximately digitiform, with apex weakly acuminate. Posterior region of subgenital plate strongly convex; longer than anterior region; posterior margin acuminate. Cerci, posterior margin of tergite X and subgenital plate densely pilose. Phallic organ not examined.

Redescription of female. Color ( Fig. 42 View FIGURE 42 ): As in male. Head ( Fig. 42A–C View FIGURE 42 ): As in male. Thorax ( Fig. 42A– C View FIGURE 42 ): As in male, but mesothorax proportionally shorter, with the following ratios: mesothorax 1.3x longer than prothorax; metathorax and median segment combined 2.5x longer than mesothorax. Legs ( Fig. 42A–C View FIGURE 42 ): As in male, but anterodorsal carina of profemur distinctly raised medially. Wings ( Fig. 42A–C View FIGURE 42 ): As in male. Abdomen ( Fig. 42A,B,E–G View FIGURE 42 ): As in Paraphasma conspersum , but tergite X not carinate and cerci very short, hardly surpassing posterior margin of tergite X ( Fig. 42F View FIGURE 42 ).

Egg not examined.

Distribution ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 : yellow circles, yellow triangles). Paraphasma trianguliferum is recorded from Suriname and French Guiana. No exact locality data are available for the Surinamese specimens, namely the lectotype and one paralectotype. In French Guiana, the species is known from Cayenne (two paralectotypes) and from the communes of Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni ( Chopard 1911) and Saül ( Jourdan et al. 2014).

Remarks. Paraphasma trianguliferum is the only species in the genus whose phallic organ was not examined in this study. Although Chopard (1920: fig. 269) presented a drawing of the phallic organ of P. trianguliferum , it is a very crude illustration, precluding the identification of genital structures and comparisons with other species.

The male and female types of P. trianguliferum housed at NHMW were labeled by O. Zompro as lectotype and paralectotype, respectively (see Figs 40D View FIGURE 40 and 42D View FIGURE 42 ). However, he did not formalize these designations in a scientific publication, so the NHMW male is here effectively designated as lectotype and the other three types (one female at NHMW; one male and one female at MHNG) as paralectotypes.

NHMW

Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien

MHNG

Museum d'Histoire Naturelle

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Phasmida

Family

Pseudophasmatidae

Genus

Paraphasma

Loc

Paraphasma trianguliferum ( Redtenbacher, 1906 )

Chiquetto-Machado, Pedro I., Morales, Adriana C. & Cancello, Eliana M. 2022
2022
Loc

Paraphasma trianguliferum, Chiquetto-Machado & Cancello, 2021: 23

Chiquetto-Machado, P. I. & Cancello, E. M. 2021: 23
2021
Loc

Oestrophora triangulifera

Conle, O. V. & Hennemann, F. H. & Bellanger, Y. & Lelong, P. & Jourdan, T. & Valero, P. 2020: 127
Delfosse, E. & Cliquennois, N. & Depraetere, M. & Robillard, T. 2019: 229
Jourdan, T. & Lelong, P. & Bellanger, Y. 2014: 494
Otte, D. & Brock, P. D. 2005: 231
Zompro, O. 2004: 102
Zompro, O. & Brock, P. D. 2003: 25
Brock, P. D. 1998: 62
Chopard, L. 1920: 167
Chopard, L. 1911: 339
Redtenbacher, J. 1906: 124
1906
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF