Taranucnus carpaticus, Gnelitsa, Valery A., 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4103.1.11 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C73C2C5A-3607-4460-B89C-DA7491D7D4B3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6054041 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B687A9-1561-FFA7-89DF-E2E87AC6F878 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Taranucnus carpaticus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Taranucnus carpaticus View in CoL new species
( Figs 1, 3–6 View FIGURES 1 – 7 , 9–10 View FIGURES 8 – 10 , 12–18, 20–25 View FIGURES 11 – 16 View FIGURES 17 – 25 )
Types. Male holotype, Carpaty National Nature Park, Verkhovyna District, Ivano-Frankovsk Region, Ukraine, 48°26’52.97”N 24°33’23.57”E, 14.VIII.2005, Chumak leg. (SSTTU); ♀ paratype, 40°–60° slope of Dancizh Mt., spruce stands with moss and lycopodium, in hollows between stones, 48°08’30.1”N 24°32’51.8”E, 09.VII.2012, Gnelitsa leg. (SSTTU); 2♀ paratypes, same data, (VGC); 2♀, Maly Breskul Mt., 48°09’22.6”N 24°31’31.6”E, slope with stones, meadow with juniper, in grass between stones, 13.VII.2012, Gnelitsa leg. (VGC).
Etymology. The species name is taken from the Carpathians, the region of type locality.
Diagnosis. Taranucnus carpaticus n. sp. is most similar to T. bihari Fage, 1931 . Males of T. carpaticus n. sp. can be differentiated from those of T. bihari by the following features: carapace length / width 1.68 / 1.37—(1.26 / 1.10 in T. bihari ); chelicerae length—width ratio 3.64–(3.75), proximal tooth of its anterior row smaller than other ones ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 11 – 16 )— (teeth are nearly the same size; Fig. 11 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ), posterior row with three small teeth gradually increasing distally—(posterior row with a small tooth); embolus not or scarcely longer than embolic membrane ( Figs 3–6 View FIGURES 1 – 7 )—(noticeably longer than embolic membrane; Figs 2, 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ), distant part of the embolic membrane curved gradually ( Figs 1, 3–6 View FIGURES 1 – 7 )—(turned round sharply; Figs 2, 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ), subtegulum with noticeable appendix frontally ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 )—(appendix on the frontal part not visible; Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ), complex outgrowth of cymbium dilated towards apex “A” or with parallel edges and rounded ( Figs 9–10 View FIGURES 8 – 10 )— (triangular in the apical part “A” and rather pointed; Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8 – 10 ), lateral appendix of cymbium “CLA” ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ) larger than of T. bihari ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Females of T. carpaticus n. sp. have the cut of the border of the anterior wall of the epigynal cavity ( Figs 17–18 View FIGURES 17 – 25 ) not as prominent T. bihari ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 17 – 25 ), (“mucrone” sensu Fage (1931)).
Male (holotype). Total length 3.50; carapace: 1.68 long, 1.37 wide; brown-yellow with brown-yellow-grey margin ( Figs 12–14 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ); sternum: 0.88 long, 0.81 wide, caudally extended between coxae IV ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 17 – 25 ), with long thin hairs, yellowgrey with slightly darker margin; posterior median eyes a diameter apart, suffused with black; chelicerae anterior margin with three teeth, basal tooth noticeably shorter than the other ones ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ); posterior margin with three small teeth, gradually increasing from proximal to apical ones; stridulating files distinct ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ). Abdomen pale grey with black pattern ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 17 – 25 ). Legs yellow; only the right side legIII completely present; spination: FeI—1d:1l; FeII—1d; FeIII—1d, TiIII—2d:1p:1r; MtIII—1d; position of metatarsal trichobothrium: III—0.18. Palp: see Figs 1, 3–6 View FIGURES 1 – 7 , 9–10 View FIGURES 8 – 10 .
Length of leg segments in male holotype of Taranucnus carpaticus n. sp.
Female (paratype). General appearance as in male. Total length 3.68; carapace 1.48 long, 1.22 wide, grey-yellow with border lines with grey ( Figs 15, 16 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ); sternum 0.85 long, 0.83 wide, caudally extended between coxae IV, dark yellow-grey ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 17 – 25 ); posterior median eyes a diameter apart; anterior margin of chelicerae distaly with three teeth of equal size, posterior margin with five tiny teeth; stridulating files very thin, indistinct. Abdomen pale grey with black pattern ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 17 – 25 ). Legs yelow; the chaetotaxy of the tibia of the correspondent right and left legs differs: left (right) legs spination: FeI—1d:1p, TiI—2d:2p:3r: 2v (2d:2p:3r: 2v), MtI—2d; FeII—1d, TiII—2d:1p:1r: 1v (2d:2p:1r: 2v), MtII—2d; FeIII—1d, TiIII—2d:1p (2d:1p:1r: 1v), MtIII—2d; TiIV—2d:1p:1r: 1v (2d:2p:2r: 1v), MtIV—2d; position of metatarsal trichobothrium: I—0.21, II—0.23, III—0.23. Epigynum: see Figs 17–18, 20 View FIGURES 17 – 25 ; vulva: see Fig. 21 View FIGURES 17 – 25 .
Length of leg segments in female Taranucnus carpaticus n. sp.
Distribution. For the distribution of T. carpaticus n. sp, T. bihari and T. cf. bihari see Fig. 34 View FIGURE 34 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |