Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes, 1948

Farazmand, Azadeh, Jalaeian, Mahdi, Kamali, Hashem, Saboori, Alireza, Tixier, MarieStéphane & Kreiter, Serge, 2023, Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) in four provinces of Iran, Persian Journal of Acarology 12 (1), pp. 21-58 : 23-25

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.22073/pja.v12i1.77425

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B71F3D-FFB6-D453-FD82-9CE4FE61D932

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes, 1948
status

 

Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes, 1948 View in CoL View at ENA

Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes, 1948: 141 View in CoL ; Ryu et al. 2001: 8; Moraes et al. 1986: 70, 2004: 104; Chant & McMurtry 2003: 35, 2007: 25.

Typhlodromus (Neoseiulus) barkeri, Nesbitt 1951: 35 .

Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) barkeri, Chant 1959: 63 .

Amblyseius barkeri, Athias-Henriot 1961: 440 ; Moraes et al. 1989: 95.

Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) barkeri, Hughes 1961: 222 .

Typhlodromus barkeri, Hirschmann 1962: 5 .

Amblyseius (Amblyseius) barkeri, van der Merwe 1968: 112 .

Amblyseius mckenziei Schuster & Pritchard, 1963: 268 (synonymy according to Ragusa & Athias-Henriot 1983).

Amblyseius usitatus van der Merwe, 1965: 71 View in CoL (synonymy according to Ueckermann & Loots 1988). Amblyseius oahuensis Prasad, 1968: 1518 (synonymy according to Ragusa & Athias-Henriot 1983). Amblyseius picketti Specht, 1968: 681 (synonymy according to Ragusa & Athias-Henriot 1983). Amblyseius mycophilus Karg, 1970: 290 (synonymy according to Ragusa & Athias-Henriot 1983). Amblyseius masiaka Blommers & Chazeau, 1974: 308 (synonymy according to Ueckermann & Loots 1988).

Specimens examined – 20 ♀♀ and two ♂♂. Guilan Province – one ♀, Rasht (3 m aasl, 49° 35′ 33′′ E, 37° 16′ 50.87′′ N), from the leaves of Rubus idaeus View in CoL L. ( Rosaceae View in CoL ), 28.VII.2020. Sistan and Baluchestan Province – 1 ♀, Konarak city, Tang village (15 m aasl, 59° 59′ 14′′ E, 25° 32′ 02′′ N), on Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) De Candolle (Fabaceae) , 3.IV.2018; 2 ♀♀, Zabol city Balakhaneh village (483 m aasl, 61° 30′ 13′′ E, 31° 03′ 08′′ N), on Morus sp. (Moraceae) , 10.V.2018; 1 ♀, Chahanimeh region (501 m aasl, 61° 43′ 07′′ E, 30° 50′ 39′′ N), on Olea europea L. ( Oleaceae View in CoL ), 11.V.2018; 1 ♀, Bampur city, Rige Kaput village (526 m aasl, 60° 29′ 52′′ E, 27° 11′ 57′′ N), on Ziziphus sp. (Rhamnaceae) , 18.X.2018; 2 ♀♀, Zahedan city, Kalateh Razagh Zadeh (1497 m aasl, 60° 48′ 50′′ E, 29° 23′ 28′′ N), on Pinus sp. (Pinaceae) , 19.X.2018; 1 ♀, Zabol city, Agricultural Research Center (481 m aasl, 61° 29′ 22′′ E, 31° 01′ 10′′ N), on Phragmites sp. (Poaceae) , 5.II.2019; 2 ♀♀, Mirjaveh city (1562 m aasl, 61° 14′ 01′′ E, 28° 47′ 03′′ N), on Rosa damascena Miller (Rosaceae) View in CoL , 9.II.2019; 1 ♀ and 1 ♂, Fanouj city (729 m aasl, 61° 31′ 19′′ E, 30° 51′ 13′′ N), on Pistacia terebinthus View in CoL L. ( Anacardiaceae View in CoL ), 9.IV.2019; 2 ♀♀, Sistan Dam (486 m aasl, 59° 38′ 58′′ E, 26° 24′ 44′′ N), on unknown weeds, 31.V.2019; 1 ♀, Niatak forest (482 m aasl, 61° 37′ 15′′ E, 31° 07′ 06′′ N), on unknown weeds, 2.VI.2019; 3 ♀♀, Khash city, Deh Pabid village (1777 m aasl, 60° 47′ 08′′ E, 28° 36′ 29′′ N), on Prunus armeniaca View in CoL L. ( Rosaceae View in CoL ), 1.IX.2019; 1 ♀, Zabol city, Ebrahim Abad (481 m aasl, 61° 26′ 07′′ E, 30° 54′ 53′′ N), on Eucalyptus sp. (Myrtaceae) , 31.VII.2019; 1 ♀ and 1 ♂, Nimrooz city (481 m aasl, 61° 24′ 40′′ E, 31° 07′ 04′′ N), on Salsola sp. (Amaranthaceae) , 8.VII.2020.

World distribution – Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Benin, Brazil, Burundi, Canary islands, Cape Verde, Chile, China, Cyprus, Egypt, England, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guinea, Hawaii, India, Iran, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Madagascar, Malawi, Mayotte island, Morocco, Mozambique, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Portugal, Reunion island, Rodrigues island, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Slovenia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Syria, Taiwan, Tahiti, Thailand, Tunisia, Türkiye, Ukraine, USA, West bank, Yemen. Precise distribution in Iran is documented in Kazemi et al. (2022).

Remarks – This species was already recorded from Guilan Province but is a new record for Sistan and Baluchestan Province. Morphological and morphometric characters fit well the numerous previous measurements already published (See for example Rahmani et al. 2010; Beaulieu and Beard 2018; Kreiter et al. 2020b).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Mesostigmata

Family

Phytoseiidae

Genus

Neoseiulus

Loc

Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes, 1948

Farazmand, Azadeh, Jalaeian, Mahdi, Kamali, Hashem, Saboori, Alireza, Tixier, MarieStéphane & Kreiter, Serge 2023
2023
Loc

Amblyseius (Amblyseius) barkeri

van der Merwe, G. G. 1968: 112
1968
Loc

Amblyseius usitatus

Blommers, L. & Chazeau J. 1974: 308
Karg, W. 1970: 290
Prasad, V. 1968: 1518
Specht, H. B. 1968: 681
van der Merwe, G. G. 1965: 71
1965
Loc

Amblyseius mckenziei

Schuster, R. O. & Pritchard, A. E. 1963: 268
1963
Loc

Typhlodromus barkeri

Hirschmann, W. 1962: 5
1962
Loc

Amblyseius barkeri

Moraes, G. J. de & McMurtry, J. A. & Yaninek, J. S. 1989: 95
Athias-Henriot, C. 1961: 440
1961
Loc

Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) barkeri

Hughes, A. M. 1961: 222
1961
Loc

Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) barkeri

Chant, D. A. 1959: 63
1959
Loc

Typhlodromus (Neoseiulus) barkeri

Nesbitt, H. H. J. 1951: 35
1951
Loc

Neoseiulus barkeri

Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. 2007: 25
Moraes, G. J. de & McMurtry, J. A. & Denmark, H. A. & Campos, C. B. 2004: 104
Chant, D. A. & McMurtry, J. A. 2003: 35
Ryu, M. O. & Lee, W. K. & Cho, S. R. 2001: 8
Moraes, G. J. de & McMurtry, J. A. & Denmark, H. A. 1986: 70
Hughes, A. M. 1948: 141
1948
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF