Oosternum

Hebauer, Martin Fiká Č Ek Franz & Hansen, Michael, 2009, Taxonomic revision of New World species of the genus Oosternum Sharp (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae: Sphaeridiinae) I. Definition of species groups and revision of the Oosternum aequinoctiale group, Zootaxa 2054, pp. 1-37 : 10

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.186668

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5680133

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B74947-FF87-FFAE-23B2-FF52FA644489

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Oosternum
status

 

Key to Oosternum View in CoL species groups

1. Pronotum bearing weak (see Fig. 13 View FIGURES 11 – 26 in Smetana 1978) to very high longitudinal costae ( Figs. 11–12 View FIGURES 11 – 26 ). Frons between eyes elevated above remaining surface ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 27 – 31 ). Prosternal plate with large lateral cavities ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 11 – 26 ). Elevated por- tion of metaventrite nearly reaching lateral margins of metaventrite, not pentagonal ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 27 – 31 )...... O. sculptum View in CoL group

- Pronotum evenly convex, without any trace of longitudinal costae. Interocular portion of frons not elevated ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 27 – 31 ). Prosternal plate without deep lateral cavities ( Figs. 24–26 View FIGURES 11 – 26 ). Elevated portion of metaventrite pentagonal, con- fined to median portion of the metaventrite ( Figs. 30–31 View FIGURES 27 – 31 ) .......................................................................................... 2

2. Elytral series 10 short but present, situated anteriorly between series 9 and elytral margin ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 11 – 26 ) ........................... ....................................................................................................................................................... O. soricoides View in CoL group

- Elytral series 10 absent ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 11 – 26 ) .................................................................................................................................. 3

3. Pronotum more convex than elytra ( Figs. 15–16 View FIGURES 11 – 26 ) ....................................................................................................... 4

- Pronotum not more convex than elytra ( Figs. 13–14 View FIGURES 11 – 26 ). ................................................................................................. 6

4. Median portion of prosternum at most slightly elevated, weakly demarcated from lateral portions ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 11 – 26 ). Elytral interval 2 as wide as interval 3 ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 11 – 26 )..................................................................................................... O. group A

- Median portion of prosternum demarcated from lateral portions by sharp ridges ( Figs. 25–26 View FIGURES 11 – 26 ). Elytral interval 2 much narrower than interval 3 ...................................................................................................................................... 5

5. Prosternal plate narrow, 1.0–1.5× wider than long ( Figs. 26 View FIGURES 11 – 26 , 66–71). Median lobe of aedeagus with lateral projec- tions (Figs. 36–41) .................................................................................................................... O. aequinoctiale group

- Prosternal plate very wide, ca. 2.0× wider than long (as in Fig. 25 View FIGURES 11 – 26 ). Median lobe of aedeagus without lateral projec- tions ............................................................................................................................................................ O. group B

6. Median portion of prosternum demarcated from lateral parts by sharp ridges ( Figs. 25–26 View FIGURES 11 – 26 ) ...................................... 7

- Median part of prosternum at most slightly elevated, not demarcated from lateral portions by sharp ridges (as in Fig. 24 View FIGURES 11 – 26 ) ................................................................................................................................................................................. 9

7. Elytral interval 2 slightly narrower than interval 3, quickly narrowing posteriad and not reaching elytral apex ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 11 – 26 ) .................................................................................................................................................... O. sahlbergi View in CoL group

- Elytral interval much narrower than interval 3, continually narrowing posteriad, reaching elytral apex ( Figs. 19–20 View FIGURES 11 – 26 ). ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 8

8. Prosternal plate ca. as long as wide (as in Fig. 26 View FIGURES 11 – 26 )............................................................................... O. sharpi View in CoL group

- Prosternal plate very wide, ca. 2.0× wider than long ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 11 – 26 )....................................................... O. attacomis View in CoL group

9. Elytral interval 2 much narrower than interval 3 (as in Fig. 20 View FIGURES 11 – 26 ) ................................................... O. pubescens View in CoL group

- Elytral interval 2 ca. as wide as interval 3 (as in Fig. 22 View FIGURES 11 – 26 )............................................................................. O. group C

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Hydrophilidae

SubFamily

Sphaeridiinae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) CoL Data Package (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF